Build with graphite (cloog, ppl) as installed on Debian testing (20090823) fails with -Wc++-compat error.

2009-08-24 Thread Toon Moene
[ It passed the --enable-cloog-version-check ] As follows: /home/toon/compilers/obj-t/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/toon/compilers/obj-t/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/snp/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/snp/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/snp/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/snp/x86_64-

Re: GCC Status Report (2009-08-23)

2009-08-24 Thread Toon Moene
Mark Mitchell wrote: Status == The trunk is in Stage 1. As previously stated, we expect that Stage 1 will last through at least the end of August. Perhaps it is a good idea to list here what new features we expect to be *in* 4.5 (e.g., which branches we expect to be merged into mainline

Re: Build with graphite (cloog, ppl) as installed on Debian testing (20090823) fails with -Wc++-compat error.

2009-08-24 Thread Tobias Grosser
Hi Toon, did you build with the latest cloog-ppl package. It is 0.15.7 and available at ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/. Gcc should build without any problems using this package. Can you verify this? The problem was in the cloog-ppl headers and was fixed in CLooG-ppl 0.15.4 (I think).

Re: Build with graphite (cloog, ppl) as installed on Debian testing (20090823) fails with -Wc++-compat error.

2009-08-24 Thread Toon Moene
Tobias Grosser wrote: The problem was in the cloog-ppl headers and was fixed in CLooG-ppl 0.15.4 (I think). We should add a check for ClooG revision to make configure fail on outdated cloog 0.15 revisions. I think that's the best option. I was waiting for Debian to include a current cloog

Re: Build with graphite (cloog, ppl) as installed on Debian testing (20090823) fails with -Wc++-compat error.

2009-08-24 Thread Matthias Klose
On 24.08.2009 15:57, Toon Moene wrote: Tobias Grosser wrote: The problem was in the cloog-ppl headers and was fixed in CLooG-ppl 0.15.4 (I think). We should add a check for ClooG revision to make configure fail on outdated cloog 0.15 revisions. I think that's the best option. I was waiting f

darwin8 / ppc bootstrap is failing for me.

2009-08-24 Thread IainS
uname -mrs Darwin 8.11.0 Power Macintosh ../gcc-4-5-regtest/configure --prefix=/Volumes/ScratchCS/gcc-4-5- install --target=powerpc-apple-darwin8 --host=powerpc-apple-darwin8 -- build=powerpc-apple-darwin8 --enable-languages=c,objc,c++,obj-c+ +,fortran --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs -

Re: darwin8 / ppc bootstrap is failing for me.

2009-08-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Iain, * IainS wrote on Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 07:16:05PM CEST: > uname -mrs > Darwin 8.11.0 Power Macintosh > configure: WARNING: decimal float is not supported for this target > configure: WARNING: fixed-point is not supported for this target > configure: error: in `/Volumes/ScratchCS/gcc-4

Re: Build with graphite (cloog, ppl) as installed on Debian testing (20090823) fails with -Wc++-compat error.

2009-08-24 Thread Jack Howarth
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 03:40:54PM +0200, Tobias Grosser wrote: > Hi Toon, > > did you build with the latest cloog-ppl package. It is 0.15.7 and > availa...@ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/. > > Gcc should build without any problems using this package. Can you verify > this? > > The pro

Re: darwin8 / ppc bootstrap is failing for me.

2009-08-24 Thread IainS
Hi Ralf, On 24 Aug 2009, at 18:47, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Iain, * IainS wrote on Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 07:16:05PM CEST: uname -mrs Darwin 8.11.0 Power Macintosh configure: WARNING: decimal float is not supported for this target configure: WARNING: fixed-point is not supported for thi

Re: darwin8 / ppc bootstrap is failing for me.

2009-08-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* IainS wrote on Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:17:37PM CEST: > > the configure that's failing is GMP rather than gcc... maybe I've > missed a requirement to update? > configure:11139: /lib/cpp -DNO_ASM conftest.cc > /Volumes/ScratchCS/gcc-4-5-regtest/gmp/configure: line 1: /lib/cpp: > No such file or

ixp425 configuration

2009-08-24 Thread Kevin Handy
Is it possible to configure a working gcc cross compiler from the Intel ixp425 processor (linux system OS build, trying to update to use eabi)? This is an arm xscale processor without floating point. Every --target I've tried fails compiling with build errors, including missing header files, con

Re: GCC Status Report (2009-08-23)

2009-08-24 Thread Mark Mitchell
Toon Moene wrote: > Perhaps it is a good idea to list here what new features we expect to be > *in* 4.5 (e.g., which branches we expect to be merged into mainline > before we branch) ? I think that LTO and Graphite are the two major features certain for 4.5. VTA is the possible third major featu

IRA undoing scheduling decisions

2009-08-24 Thread Charles J. Tabony
Fellow GCC developers, I am seeing a performance regression on the port I maintain, and I would appreciate some pointers. When I compile the following code void f(int *x, int *y){ *x = 7; *y = 4; } with GCC 4.3.2, I get the desired sequence of instructions. I'll call it sequence A: r0 =

Re: IRA undoing scheduling decisions

2009-08-24 Thread Adam Nemet
"Charles J. Tabony" writes: > I see the same difference between GCC 4.3.2 and 4.4.0 when compiling > for PowerPC, MIPS, ARM, and FR-V. I can confirm this with mainline on MIPS/Octeon. Can you please file a bug. Adam