On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 08:56 +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > OK for stage 1 (GCC 4.5), currently pretty much everything is frozen on
> > > mainline, except regressions (I hope stage 1 will open soon, since we have
> > > monthes of backlog of various fixes and new development blocked right now
> >
Hello,
After I compile the following file for testing, I check the dump
file called "129t.final_cleanup". I doubt about why the type "short
int" changes into "short unsigned int" during the array operations,
and at last changes back to "short int" when it stores the result into
memory.
T
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:17:36 -0500
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:19:52PM +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> > 00011000 :
> > [...]
>
> Notice how many more registers used to be pushed? I expect the new
> code is faster.
Assuming an ARM7 core with 0 wait-state memory and removin
With the two patches I submitted 4.4 produces
100% clean ACATS and gnat.dg results on mipsel-linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-02/msg01730.html
Which is way better than 4.3 :).
Laurent
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 08:56 +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > OK for stage 1 (GCC 4.5), curre
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 06:03:58PM +0800, JCX wrote:
> Hello,
> After I compile the following file for testing, I check the dump
> file called "129t.final_cleanup". I doubt about why the type "short
> int" changes into "short unsigned int" during the array operations,
> and at last changes bac
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:55:43AM -0800, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 06:03:58PM +0800, JCX wrote:
> > Hello,
> > After I compile the following file for testing, I check the dump
> > file called "129t.final_cleanup". I doubt about why the type "short
> > int" changes into "sh
Honza,
You mentioned recently that you are making changes in IPA-CP wrt
clones. Simon recently found a test case that I'm hoping will be
handled by your changes. Essentially, the problem happens when we
clone a node for IPACP whose caller is itself cloned.
In this case (attached), we have a fun
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:35, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Honza,
>
> You mentioned recently that you are making changes in IPA-CP wrt
> clones. Simon recently found a test case that I'm hoping will be
> handled by your changes. Essentially, the problem happens when we
> clone a node for IPACP whose
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64. The only conflict the merge
brought was a name conflict for testsuite/g++.dg/opt/thunk3.C. I
renamed the version we had on the branch.
Diego.
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20090218 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20090218/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
wow, just received this response from December 2008 -- 2 month delivery via
the internet
I will look at the test results and try to compile, I have been compiling
other stuff using gcc, but I never compiled the compiler, so I will
certainly try this! A huge thanks to your time and response!
B
11 matches
Mail list logo
