Re: ARM interworking question

2009-01-22 Thread Zoltán Kócsi
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:49:00 + Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > [...] > No, this shouldn't be happening unless a) you are doing something > wrong; b) the options you are supplying to the compiler/linker are > suggesting some sort of stubs are necessary. It was case a), an option left in the mak

Re: Size of the GCC repository

2009-01-22 Thread Paolo Carlini
Bernd Roesch wrote: > if the size is a problem, Well, not normally, yesterday wanted to have something working as soon as possible and 5G more (vs the docs) meant hours for me :( Today will apply a wwwdocs patchlet as obvious. > i find out that the test programs eat most space > in gcc project, de

Re: Size of the GCC repository

2009-01-22 Thread Paolo Carlini
Paolo Carlini wrote: > Well, not normally, yesterday wanted to have something working as soon > as possible and 5G more (vs the docs) meant hours for me :( Today will > apply a wwwdocs patchlet as obvious. > This. Paolo. / 2008-01-22 Paolo Carlini * htdocs/rsync.html: Updat

Re: Size of the GCC repository

2009-01-22 Thread Andreas Schwab
Paolo Carlini writes: > for the record, today I started an rsync to get a local copy of the > repository and, at variance with the information in: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/rsync.html > > the size I'm seeing is already > 17G, and counting... The git mirror contains the same information in 455024K

Antwort: Re: Size of the GCC repository

2009-01-22 Thread Markus Milleder
Paolo Carlini wrote: > Paolo Carlini wrote: > > Well, not normally, yesterday wanted to have something working as soon > > as possible and 5G more (vs the docs) meant hours for me :( Today will > > apply a wwwdocs patchlet as obvious. > > > This. > > Paolo. > -The whole repository takes over 12G

Re: Antwort: Re: Size of the GCC repository

2009-01-22 Thread Paolo Carlini
Markus Milleder wrote: > Or better ? > +The whole repository takes about 17G of disk space at the start > +of 2009, growing about 3G per year. > I think you can commit it as obvious, thanks! Paolo.

Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB

2009-01-22 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Ok, so it seems the fix is to reinstate the override in sol2.h, > right? This wouldn't change anything except for Solaris. The fix is probably to wipe out the SVR4 definition (and consequently all definitions in config/sparc since the remaining ones will duplicate the default). -- Eric Botc

Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2009-01-22 Thread Matthias Klose
Richard Guenther schrieb: > A release candidate for GCC 4.3.3 is available from > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.3-RC-20090117/ > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 143460. Lucas did do two test rebuilds of the current Debian lenny/testing archive for

Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2009-01-22 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Matthias Klose wrote: > Richard Guenther schrieb: > > A release candidate for GCC 4.3.3 is available from > > > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.3-RC-20090117/ > > > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 143460. > > Lucas did do two te

Re: Size of the GCC repository

2009-01-22 Thread Robert Dewar
Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Paolo Carlini wrote: This. Thanks, Paolo! Scary how quickly this is growing... Gerald Well it's probably growing more slowly than a) disk capactiy at reasonable price b) broadband bandwidths in general As long as that's true, no need to get too

Re: Size of the GCC repository

2009-01-22 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Paolo Carlini wrote: > This. Thanks, Paolo! Scary how quickly this is growing... Gerald

Document error on TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION ?

2009-01-22 Thread Bingfeng Mei
Hello, According to current GCC internal manual. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/File-Framework.html#index-TARGET_005fASM_005fNAMED_005fSECTION-4335 - Target Hook: void TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION (const char *name, unsigned int flags, unsigned int align) Output assembly directives to swi

Re: Document error on TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION ?

2009-01-22 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Bingfeng Mei" writes: > According to current GCC internal manual. > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/File-Framework.html#index-TARGET_005fASM_005fNAMED_005fSECTION-4335 > > - Target Hook: void TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION (const char *name, unsigned int > flags, unsigned int align) > > Out

gcc-4.3-20090122 is now available

2009-01-22 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20090122 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20090122/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

[graphite] Polyhedral Compilation Package Interface Specification

2009-01-22 Thread Jan Sjodin
Below is a link to the Polyhderal Compilation Package Interface, which will be used as an interface between the polyhedral representation and GIMPLE. This will be integrated in the Graphite branch and we will propose this for GCC 4.5. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite?action=AttachFile&do=view&t