I used buildroot tool to build GCC and did not get the make command line,
so didn't find it.
Thanks.
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Amker.Cheng" wrote:
>
>> Here the destination directory is $(DESTDIR)$(libexecsubdir)/, but
>> where is DESTDIR defined?
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Eric Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For if-conversion pass (pass_if_after_combine), we can see there're
> some IF-THEN-ELSE cases which we try to transform. Let's say
> find_if_case_1, for an example.
>
> (1)
>if (test) goto over; // x not l
A patch follows. I didn't take care of the scheduling case the correct
way, tought (aliased to clz class).
Can someone please review (works for me (c)) and merge?
-- Alexandre
--- gcc-4.3.2/gcc/config/arm/arm.md~2008-12-05 18:17:09.0 -0200
+++ gcc-4.3.2/gcc/config/arm/arm.md 2008-
On Monday 08 December 2008, Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote:
> A patch follows. I didn't take care of the scheduling case the correct
> way, tought (aliased to clz class).
Please read http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
In particular you need a copyright assignment, ChangeLog entry, and testing.
Yo
Michael Eager wrote:
Another possibility is illegal rtl sharing.
If you mean that an rtx would be pointed to by two different
insn's, how would that happen? (Excluding someone mucking
things up deliberately or accidentally.)
Generally this sort of mistake happens in the backend somewhere.
E.
> 2008/12/8 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 08 December 2008, Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote:
>> A patch follows. I didn't take care of the scheduling case the correct
>> way, tought (aliased to clz class).
>
> Please read http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
>
> In particular you need a c
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:37 AM, "Alexandre Pereira Nunes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
2008/12/8 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Monday 08 December 2008, Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote:
A patch follows. I didn't take care of the scheduling case the
correct
way, tought (a
"Alexandre Pereira Nunes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can provide these, tough as for the copyright assignment, the
> document mentions I can declare the changes in public domain, and
> since I already published something (which may or may not be used by
> someone in the future), I hereby
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Unfortunately we need more than that: we need a signed piece of paper
disclaiming copyright.
This is something I stumbled over some month ago when I studied the
submission rules:
I am now a lawyer, but as far as I know in my country (germany) it is
not possible to
Hi,
following on from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-05/msg00202.html
should I expect
"--enable-tls"
to produce a functional result on {intel,powerpc}-*-darwin{8,9}
or should all testcases with thread local requirements be wrapped with
{ dg-require-effective-target tls_runtime }
thanks,
Iai
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:04 PM, IainS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> following on from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-05/msg00202.html
As I mentioned; it is emulated. So it works, by default, though it is
not native support (that is there is no ABI helper that speeds it up).
In fact tls_runtime sh
Nils Pipenbrinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am now a lawyer, but as far as I know in my country (germany) it is
> not possible to decline copyright (called Urheberrecht here - it's not
> exactly the same but close). You can give away the usage-rights to
> your code at will and for free (by pu
Richard Henderson wrote:
Michael Eager wrote:
Another possibility is illegal rtl sharing.
If you mean that an rtx would be pointed to by two different
insn's, how would that happen? (Excluding someone mucking
things up deliberately or accidentally.)
Generally this sort of mistake happens in
> It avoids a branch instruction. For the first case, the path via "x =
> a" is "test -> jump -> set -> jump" (where "set" is th "x =
> a"-instruction). This becomes "set -> test -> jump". So one jump
> less.
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation. However, I have a
doubt here. IMO, t
Hello,
I used the spim5 gcc 4.0.2 to study gcc port. but I found there are lots of
the 'move' insns redundancy code. For example, the C code like this:
i=1;
i = i + 5;
the Spim compiler will generate the code like the following(PS:RX is the
register) .
li R0, #1
SW R0, 0(MEM)
LW R0
Hi,
2 questions:
1) Is "gcc -r" officially supported by gcc?
It apparently works, but I can't find it documented anywhere in GCC's
documentation.
2) Is "gcc -r" any different from using "gcc -Wl,-r"?
Ralf
Jeff Law wrote:
Richard Henderson wrote:
Michael Eager wrote:
Another possibility is illegal rtl sharing.
If you mean that an rtx would be pointed to by two different
insn's, how would that happen? (Excluding someone mucking
things up deliberately or accidentally.)
Generally this sort of m
17 matches
Mail list logo
