Simon Hill wrote:
Sorry Paolo, that definitely should have been.
no problem.
Is this a bug?
I think so. I opened c++/37234, you may want to add yourself to the CC
list of the PR.
Paolo.
> My point is that if the rest of the compiler extends diagnostics.c to
> handle caret and ranges and all other features, Ada would need carry
> all that around even if gnat has its own diagnostics machinery. But
> perhaps that is OK.
Certainly OK, what possible (noticeable) issue would you forese
Dear all,
If you mess up a commit log, not everything is lost. You can edit the
commit log of a particular revision by doing:
svn propedit -r REVISION --revprop svn:log
Note that this change is not versioned: whatever was the log before is
completely overwritten by the new one.
I have fixed the
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 16:41 +0530, Niklaus wrote:
> i ran with this file under testsuite/gcc.dj and it aborted with -O2.
> It is for the optimization bug that i reported few days back. If we
> don't have this test can someone add ths.
File a bug report, if you haven't already, and include the test
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 14:27 -0700, Karl Lindstrom wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to port the testsuite to an embedded environment.
> I have gotten all of the needed tests to compile, and am debugging
> those test that fail at runtime now.
>
> \ext\stdio_filebuf\char\10063-1.cc fails.
This test
I'm seeing messages on this list repeating over and over (several
minutes apart, maybe as much as 15 minutes or so). I'm not sure if
the are just messages from Manuel or also from others.
Is it just me? It seems to be specific to this list...
paul
Paul Koning wrote:
I'm seeing messages on this list repeating over and over (several
minutes apart, maybe as much as 15 minutes or so). I'm not sure if
the are just messages from Manuel or also from others.
Is it just me? It seems to be specific to this list...
It seems that all the repe
Am Dienstag 26 August 2008 schrieb Paul Koning:
> I'm seeing messages on this list repeating over and over (several
> minutes apart, maybe as much as 15 minutes or so). I'm not sure if
> the are just messages from Manuel or also from others.
>
> Is it just me? It seems to be specific to this list
Richard Henderson wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Can we declare that Linux/ia32 generates i486 insn by default?
>
> We the gcc team? I'm not sure. For now I'll say no.
>
> We an individual linux distributor? Certainly.
> In fact I would be surprised if i586 wasn't a
> decent minimum these days.
I
If you build and install binutils (for instance in $HOME), I think
GCC build will use them when using --prefix to build GCC.
But for GMP and MPFR, you need to set --with-gmp to the same path as
--prefix.
Would it be simpler to use the same --prefix to build binutils, GMP,
MPFR and GCC - so defau
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Obviously, distributors can do whatever they please, but the C++
run-time library needs to tolerate CPUs without this feature. It can of
course offer reduced functionality (at compile-time or at run-time) on
CPUs without the necessary support.
As far as I'm concerned, I t
Mark Mitchell:
Richard Henderson wrote:
H.J. Lu wrote:
Can we declare that Linux/ia32 generates i486 insn by default?
We the gcc team? I'm not sure. For now I'll say no.
We an individual linux distributor? Certainly.
In fact I would be surprised if i586 wasn't a
decent minimum these days.
On 8/26/08, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Koning wrote:
> > I'm seeing messages on this list repeating over and over (several
> > minutes apart, maybe as much as 15 minutes or so). I'm not sure if
> > the are just messages from Manuel or also from others.
> > Is it just me? It see
13 matches
Mail list logo
