On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Kaveh R. GHAZI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> > The mailing list webpage still refers to CVS:
>> > http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html
>> >
>> > Can we rename these lists (perhaps preserving an alias for the old names)
>> >
Biggest problem is that gimple only works in source code to object.
Not with a stack of objects to exe. This has major downsides for
static building. To the point a lot of static builders end up sending
all .c files into gcc at once so they get cross object optimised.
One possible solution coul
Peter Dolding wrote on 21 July 2008 12:12:
> Biggest problem is that gimple only works in source code to object.
> Not with a stack of objects to exe.
We're on the case. You're looking for the LTO project.
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimization
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think o
On 7/20/08 1:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
--- 2318,2326
for (i = 0; i < gimple_num_ops (s); i++)
if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (gimple_op (s, i)))
{
! /* FIXME tuples. This assign is over-eager at least
! for Ada.
! gcc_assert (gimple_ha
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 7/20/08 1:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > --- 2318,2326
> > for (i = 0; i < gimple_num_ops (s); i++)
> > if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (gimple_op (s, i)))
> > {
> > ! /* FIXME tuples. This assign is over-eager at least
> >
> Kaveh R GHAZI writes:
Kaveh> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> > The mailing list webpage still refers to CVS:
>> > http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html
>> >
>> > Can we rename these lists (perhaps preserving an alias for the old names)
>> > so that they reflect reality?
>>
>> I don'
Hi all
I have need to compile code for an old ARC tangent A4 core.
1) Gcc 3.x does support ARC Tangent-A4
2) Gcc 4.x dose support ARC Tangent-A4
if answer is 'not' for both question i will try to introduce code in
arc.md and arc.c files to compile code for ARC Tangent-A4. Is this an
hard task
Hi,
(I finally resumed the work on my microcontroller I posted about 3
months ago...)
I have a problem with the jump instructions: my direct jumps are very
limited in displacements, and I want to always generate indirect jumps
instead.
So I wrote this:
(define_insn "jump"
[(se
Hello all,
For the target that i am porting if support for partial argument
passing is enabled i get the following error:
error: Attempt to delete prologue/epilogue insn:
internal compiler error: in propagate_one_insn, at flow.c:1699
This is 16bit target with 4 argument registers. FRAME_POINTER_R
David Edelsohn wrote on 21 July 2008 13:33:
>> Kaveh R GHAZI writes:
>
> Kaveh> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
The mailing list webpage still refers to CVS:
http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html
Can we rename these lists (perhaps preserving an alias for the old
> I have need to compile code for an old ARC tangent A4 core.
> 1) Gcc 3.x does support ARC Tangent-A4
> 2) Gcc 4.x dose support ARC Tangent-A4
Both contain a port which in principle targets the ARCtangent-A4.
I don't know if it actually works, it might be subject to bitrot.
We at ARC have a mor
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> Yes, the suggested changes are good.
Thanks for the review, Arnaud, and thanks again for the patch, Santiago!
I committed this with minor formatting changes and fixed some markup
issues directly afterwards.
Gerald
From: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hear, hear. The name of the list is an arbitrary label, not instructions
on what kind of client to use to access the repository; why, just for the
sake of making it "correct" in some non-functional sense of the word
should
everyone in the world have to adju
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:50:43AM -0700, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Jeez, I didn't realize people felt so viscerally against this. I thought
> the impact on users would be small. I.e. I'm curious who actually
> subscribes to the gcc-cvs list. Is it a large list? (I don't know.)
Just come up with
"Kaveh R. Ghazi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeez, I didn't realize people felt so viscerally against this. I thought
> the impact on users would be small. I.e. I'm curious who actually
> subscribes to the gcc-cvs list. Is it a large list? (I don't know.)
There are 105 subscribers to the gc
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote on 21 July 2008 19:51:
> From: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Hear, hear. The name of the list is an arbitrary label, not
>> instructions on what kind of client to use to access the repository;
>> why, just for the sake of making it "correct" in some non-functional
>> se
Hi,
I haven't heard anything back on my questions. Can any of C++ frontend
maintainers please shed some light (or comment on my proposed patch)?
Thanks a lot.
Le-chun
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Le-Chun Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my attribute handlers that handle the new th
- Moving pairs
Given something like a checkers board, moving pairs would be checkers
paired together and arranged on the board
Given something like a checkers board, moving pairs are checker pieces
said to be paired.
The pairs don't have to be next to eachother.
Any way arranged is fair for how
18 matches
Mail list logo
