> * "End of first pass" may be a little gold specific. Perhaps it
> should be called something like "after all input files have been
> seen."
Sure. It seems to me that the pass 1, middle, pass 2 breakdown is
pretty common for linkers, though perhaps not universal. I'll find a
better name (I was
> On the "claim file", can you also pass the "file" size in the case it
> is inside an archive?
Good idea. Will do.
-cary
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Dave Korn wrote:
I was looking for GCC 3.3.3 just now, and noticed that it doesn't
exist on the generic GNU FTP server or its mirrors
(ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc for example). 3.3.2 and 3.3.4 are there,
as well as
[David, my fallible memory says that you operate this incredibly useful
service: if not, feel free to ignore it / tell me who does / forward
it on.]
I just had reason to want to look at the 4.3 branch (as opposed to HEAD
as usual) and found that the git mirror on git.infradead.org isn't
tracking
Dear sir,
I add a pass for the loop optimization. I try to add a function call
but failed due to ssa error.
In order to verify the error, I just add a simple function call such
as time() without any parameter in the first basic block.
I will get the error:
hello1.c: In function main
hello1.c:5:
Joshua Sumali wrote:
> Attached patch puts files aot-compile-rm, aot-compile, and
> rebuild-gcj-db into libjava/contrib. These files are taken from
> java-gcj-compat and are intended to be available for packagers. This
> is the second part of merging java-gcj-compat into libgcj (also see
> sdk st
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Fern Moon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear sir,
>
> I add a pass for the loop optimization. I try to add a function call
> but failed due to ssa error.
>
> In order to verify the error, I just add a simple function call such
> as time() without any parameter in the
gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git tracks all branches.
Just remember to tell it to fetch all remote refs (since git-svn
branches are done as remotes)
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [David, my fallible memory says that you operate this incredibly useful
> service: if not,
On 6 Jul 2008, Daniel Berlin spake thusly:
> gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git tracks all branches.
Updating now, thank you :) an official GCC git repo, whoo!
> Just remember to tell it to fetch all remote refs (since git-svn
> branches are done as remotes)
That's the default for `git remote add', I thin
Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's the default for `git remote add', I think.
The default is to track all heads (refs/heads/*), other refs need to be
added manually. Only in mirror mode all refs are tracked.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products Gm
It's only "official" in that it lives on gcc.gnu.org.
It is maintained only by one person, not by the gcc project.
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6 Jul 2008, Daniel Berlin spake thusly:
>
>> gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git tracks all branches.
>
> Updating now, thank
Hi Walter,
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Walter Spector wrote:
> On the web page:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
>
> For the "SGI" line, you may also add Nekochan:
>
> http://www.nekochan.net/downloads.php
>
> Nekochan has newer versions of GNU software than the SGI site has.
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Walter Spector wrote:
On the web page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
For the "SGI" line, you may also add Nekochan:
http://www.nekochan.net/downloads.php
Nekochan has newer versions of GNU software than the SGI site has.
Angelo Graziosi wrote on 05 July 2008 12:16:
> For the sake of completeness I want to flag that the current snapshot
> 4.4-20080704 has new failures:
> /work/gcc/gcc/ggc-page.c -o ggc-page.o
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> /work/gcc/gcc/ggc-page.c: In function 'alloc_page':
> /work/gcc/
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While trying to compile coreutils with -Wextra,
> I noticed many warnings due to automatic variables
> initialized with { 0, }.
>
> As I understand it, since C90 the above will initialize
> [all members of] the type to that
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> > > Can you suggest a few things to try? E.g. I did --with-gc=zone and a
> > > couple of errors cropped up. If there are other configurations that come
> > > to mind, let me know.
> >
> > I had these in mind
On 7/6/08 6:35 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
So I tried --enable-checking=all,valgrind and it died in stage2 running
genautomata. Plus it took a hideously long time even on an 8x cpu box
just to get that far.
Yeah, valgrind is really sluggish. Thanks for giving it a try.
2008-07-07 Kaveh R. G
> Has anybody in the gcov developer community pondered or done such a
> thing?
I have pondered it, yes.
Although it might not be a particularly helpful answer, have you
considered using other tools to get what you want rather than modify
gcov and the runtime code? You could run the instrumented
"Cary Coutant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * GOLD_VERSION should perhaps say something about the format of the
>> string.
>
> OK. What would be reasonable to say here? Just a string of the form
> "n.m"? Is it reasonable to require that later versions are lexically
> greater than earlier versio
"Kaveh R. GHAZI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008-07-07 Kaveh R. Ghazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * gcc.c (execute): Fix -Wc++-compat warning.
This is OK.
Thanks.
Ian
20 matches
Mail list logo
