Paolo Carlini wrote:
Luke Dalessandro wrote:
I'm making some modifications to exception handling inside of
unwind-dw2-fde.c that I'd like to use __sync_bool_compare_and_swap
for, unfortunately I can't seem to figure out how to correctly use
builtins in the context of libgcc.
I've tried a bun
Hi,
since Manuel's patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00962.html
a lot of C++ code is now accepted on mainline (when compiling without
special flags like -fpermissive and -pedantic), that used to be rejected.
Instead of getting closer to the standard we get away from it, which is a
Volker Reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> since Manuel's patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00962.html
> a lot of C++ code is now accepted on mainline (when compiling without
> special flags like -fpermissive and -pedantic), that used to be rejected.
> Instead of getting closer
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 05:48:57PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 04:50:14PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > >> 1) make __m256 passed on stack on variadic functions and in registers
> > >> otherws
Hello
I would like to suggest to books you have not mentionned on this page :
http://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html
Bes regards
Titre : GCC : the complete reference
Auteur(s) : Griffith, Arthur. Auteur
Date(s) : cop. 2002
Langue(s) : anglais
Pays : Etats-Unis
Editeur(s) :
Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:04:25AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
The third operand to 'ins' must be a constant int, not a register.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-mips/bitops.h |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
> "Alan" == Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alan> So, the question: is it possible to identify with 100% certainty, PURELY
Alan> SYNTACTICALLY (i.e. without access to the compiler's symbol table),
Alan> when "< ... >" is a pair of template (C++) or generic (Java) brackets?
In Java,
2008/6/11 Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Volker Reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> since Manuel's patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00962.html
>> a lot of C++ code is now accepted on mainline (when compiling without
>> special flags like -fpermissive and -pedantic),
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 04:12:18PM +0200, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> * Scopes in for-loops:
>
> void foo()
> {
> for (int i=0; i<10; ++i) {}
> i = 0;
> }
>
> warn.cc: In function 'void foo()':
> warn.cc:4: warning: name lookup of 'i' changed for new ISO 'for' scoping
> warn.cc:3
I am writing a new backend for GCC 4.3.1 and have run into the
following issue with GCC 4.3.1's support for the
fixed-point 'long _Fract' type when used in a 'typedef'.
I believe this issue is generic to GCC and not to the backend.
See the (very short) testcase below and the output from GCC.
Basic
Doug,
Yesterday, we spoke briefly about the need to efficiently determine
the DECL's required by each function. Here's a more detailed
overview. During the WPA phase of WHOPR, we will be reading in a
collection of object files, performing analysis on call-graph/summary
data, and outputting repac
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Yesterday, we spoke briefly about the need to efficiently determine
> the DECL's required by each function. Here's a more detailed
> overview. During the WPA phase of WHOPR, we will be reading in a
> collection of
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20080611 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20080611/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Hi Volker, thanks for picking these issues up. I told Manuel I'd
review the rest of the remaining pedwarns, but haven't had time to do
it either.
2008/6/11 Volker Reichelt:
> * Scopes in for-loops:
>
> void foo()
> {
>for (int i=0; i<10; ++i) {}
>i = 0;
> }
>
> warn.cc: In function 'vo
>From what I can tell from grepping the lto source, the vtable entry in
lto_file is set but never used. Is this old code that never got
removed or the beginning of an idea that never got implemented?
I'm inclined to remove it if it's not doing anything.
Ollie
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I can tell from grepping the lto source, the vtable entry in
> lto_file is set but never used. Is this old code that never got
> removed or the beginning of an idea that never got implemented?
>
> I'm inclined to re
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doug,
Yesterday, we spoke briefly about the need to efficiently determine
the DECL's required by each function. Here's a more detailed
overview. During the WPA phase of WHOPR, we will be reading
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Doug,
>>>
>>> Yesterday, we spoke briefly about the need to efficiently determine
>>> the DECL's required by
Daniel Berlin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doug,
Yesterday, we spoke briefly about the need to efficiently determine
the DECL's
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 15:09 -0500, Omar Torres wrote:
> 1- I noticed that when I reply to posts, the "References" are not
> preserved, which leads to messages in the same threat not to be linked
> together. I am using Thunderbird as my email client. When I go to
> View>Headers>All the References f
20 matches
Mail list logo
