Re: Official GCC git repository

Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've been waiting until I had the time to rewrite my import with proper > author names. Does anyone have a correspondence file mapping the login > name to Author? I have a list that is about 4 months old. Should be pretty complete. Andreas. -- An

Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code

Till Straumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In any case, bad code is also produced by gcc-4.3.0 if I omit the > memory output operand and use an example that comes pretty > close to what is in the gcc info page (example illustrating > a memory input in the 'extended asm' section): Would you mind

Re: Official GCC git repository

> "Paolo" == Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I was only suggesting it as a nicity, if people are happy with the >> login name alone. Paolo> What about "Real Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"? The overseers have Paolo> the mapping, or you can sort of guess it from the names in the Paolo>

Re: larger default page sizes...

On 2008/3/26, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> i wrote: > On 2008/3/26, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> i wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:22:44 -0700 (PDT), David Miller wrote: > > > > On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, David Miller wrote: > > > > > > > > > There are ways to get large pages into th

gcc participation in C standards process

Thread "What's the deal with C99?" in comp.lang.c discusses the C99 standard, and people are among other things speculating about why gcc was never represented in the committee. I'd be interesting if you'd reply there, e.g. to to message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from lawrence.jones in the C committee:

Re: RFH: testers for ieee test

Joern , You could try using softfloat: http://www.jhauser.us/arithmetic/SoftFloat.html -- Derek M. Jones tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667 Knowledge Software Ltd mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Applications Standards Conformance Testinghttp://www.knosof.co.

Re: RFH: testers for ieee test

On Mar 27, 2008, at 02:58, Joern Rennecke wrote: I'm trying to write a test to check I get all the subnormal corner cases for ieee-754 double precision floating point division right. The usual thing to do with a new test is to try it on a known good platform. Unfortunately, the x86 processor

Re: SSA Vs unSSA

On 03/26/08 14:07, Fran Baena wrote: Hi, what are the advantages and inconvenients of get RTL from SSA rather than GIMPLE (previously translated from SSA)? It has no implication in the next optimizations, isn't it? Depends on what SSA form you want. A rewriting form is problematic because ba

Re: RFH: testers for ieee test

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 04:27:32PM +0100, Geert Bosch wrote: > >known to get these calculations wrong. Could someone with a fully > >ieee compliant FPU try this test? > > Just use -mfpmath=sse -msse2 to force use of SSE instructions > for double precision math. Should be the default nowadays, IMO

gcc-4.3-20080327 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.3-20080327 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20080327/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

gimple

Is it possible to map simplified source statements back to the original source code in GCC? If this is not possible is it possible to stop the simplification altogether and just retain the original source tree in say DECL_SAVED_TREE(...) ? I tried removing tree lowering passes but gcc still seems

please add DFP to gcc-4.3/changes.html

HJ asked this in June 2007: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-06/msg00144.html It seems as if delaying the announcement was what was desired then. Is this still the case? I was just as surprised as HJ was to not find this documented anywhere. I'd rather have it documented, and marked experimental

Re: please add DFP to gcc-4.3/changes.html

On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 19:13 -0500, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > > HJ asked this in June 2007: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-06/msg00144.html > > It seems as if delaying the announcement was what was desired then. Is > this still the case? > > I was just as surprised as HJ was to not find this doc

Re: gimple

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 19:55, Dasarath Weeratunge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible to map simplified source statements back to the > original source code in GCC? Yes, using the debugging information associated with every statement. Every statement has the file and line number of the o

Successful native mingw build gcc 4.3.0

Dunno if i should report it or not. I successfully bootstrapped gcc 4.3.0 under mingw. Env : MinGW on WinXP SP2 GCC 4.3.0-tdm-2 with sjlj exceptions Standard MinGW installation apart that Output from the built gcc -v : Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-mingw32 Configured with: ./gcc-4.3.0