Kai Henningsen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:46:12PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 16 January 2008 22:09, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/16/08 4:16 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
Because it's not a bug? You're changing the code to silence a false
negative, which this is what we here
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17/01/2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
Well, a language lawyer can probably clear things up. From a look
at the std it looks like w/o a previous declaration the above should
be invalid. And at a different point it suggests the decl becomes
available.
Yes, at the point
On 18 January 2008 08:33, Gunther Nikl wrote:
> Kai Henningsen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:46:12PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> On 16 January 2008 22:09, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>>
On 1/16/08 4:16 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Because it's not a bug? You're changing the code to
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20080118 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20080118/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Ruan Beihong wrote:
How can I get help about modifying the gcc code?
A have referred to the gcc internal manual, but it didn't help.
If the internal manual was not helpful, then I would suspect that
your best bet would be to hire a gcc knowledgable person to carry
out the modifications you req
How can I get help about modifying the gcc code?
A have referred to the gcc internal manual, but it didn't help.
Thanks.
JamesRuan
On 18/01/2008, Dragan Milenkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for clarification and info. I believe issue #34 addresses exactly
> what we're talking about.
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#34
Aha, yes ... but strangely that seems to have been closed as
Not-A
