I built SVN gcc and installed it in the default place:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -fopenmp combined_mp.c -o comb
gcc: libgomp.spec: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20071014 (experimental)
Am i doing something wrong or is this a bug in the install script?
skaller wrote:
OK, attached.
Hi skaller,
I think I've wasted my money. They do not ship OpenMP headers and libs
with Standard Edition. :(
Best Regards,
Biplab
Hi All,
I did some tests with GCC-4.2.2 (MinGW build) and the source code
provided by skaller.
The compilation log is as follows.
-- Build: Release in Test ---
[ 50.0%] mingw32-gcc.exe -Wall -fexceptions -fopenmp -O2
-IC:\MinGW\include -c C:\Projects\Test\combined_m
Hi!
i am trying to implement the SSA form, inspirated in GCC way. I have
found problems in processing indirect memory operations like arrays,
structures and pointers.
My questions are: are nodes STRUCT_FIELD_TAG, NAME_MEMORY_TAG,
SYMBOL_MEMORY_TAG used for that purpose? and, where i can find
docum
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 02:47:44PM +1000, skaller wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:02 +0800, Biplab Kumar Modak wrote:
> > skaller wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 18:14 +0100, Biagio Lucini wrote:
> > >> skaller wrote:
> > >
> > >> It would be interesting to try with another compiler. Do yo
skaller wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:02 +0800, Biplab Kumar Modak wrote:
skaller wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 18:14 +0100, Biagio Lucini wrote:
skaller wrote:
It would be interesting to try with another compiler. Do you have access
to another OpenMP-enabled compiler
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 06:00 -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
> skaller wrote:
> I don't know of any OpenMP compiler which would correct the nesting of
> parallel loops in your LU. I have assumed that OpenMP doesn't allow
> such optimization; you have to get it right yourself.
Can you explain? This co
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:04 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 02:47:44PM +1000, skaller wrote:
> On LU_mp.c according to oprofile more than 95% of time is spent in the inner
> loop, rather than any kind of waiting. On quad core with OMP_NUM_THREADS=4
> all 4 threads eat 99.9%
Pranav Bhandarkar wrote:
Hi,
In the attached testcase due to an ivopts modification, while
rewriting the uses the compiler crashes in tree-ssa-operands.c because
the number of virtual operands of the modified stmt is much greater
than the thresholds controlled by OP_SIZE_{1,2,3} in
tree-ssa-opera
Daniel, Michael J wrote:
Hi!
I'm interested in static stack analysis tools.
Either using someone else's or creating.
Where would I find existing tools?
Where would I find existing contracter software developers?
michael
AdaCore has a tool called gnatstack. Check with AdaCore
for details.
skaller wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 06:00 -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
skaller wrote:
I don't know of any OpenMP compiler which would correct the nesting of
parallel loops in your LU. I have assumed that OpenMP doesn't allow
such optimization; you have to get it right yourself.
On 19 October 2007 02:45, tim prince wrote:
> skaller wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 06:00 -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
>>
>>> skaller wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>>> I don't know of any OpenMP compiler which would correct the nesting of
>>> parallel loops in your LU. I have assumed that OpenMP doesn't all
12 matches
Mail list logo
