In the .md-file of my port, I have set an attribute "size" of every
insn, giving its size (obviously), in bytes. Is there any way I can use the
value of this attribute to determine the cost (in e.g. TARGET_RTX_COSTS)
when optimizing for size? Or is there some other smart way of achieving
the same t
> Bootstrap on i386-linux has been broken for a week now, from what I
> can see. I have reported it as PR33679
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33679), but AFAIK noone
> has reproduced it, as most people now build for i686-linux. Could
> someone please spare a cycle to confirm this pr
On 10/11/07, Tomas Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the .md-file of my port, I have set an attribute "size" of every
> insn, giving its size (obviously), in bytes. Is there any way I can use the
> value of this attribute to determine the cost (in e.g. TARGET_RTX_COSTS)
> when optimizing for
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20071011 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20071011/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 2007-10-10, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only features in the printf-family of functions that depends on the
> locale are the conversion with thousand grouping ("%'d"), and glibc
> extension of using locale's alternative output digits ("%Id").
And those dealing with float
Just to make sure before I submit a bug report: when GCC says that
a certain variable _is_ (as opposed to _may be_) used uninitialized
in this function, it means that it has proved that the variable
is indeed used uninitialized, right?
I am asking because I have a testcase where g++ gives this w
On 11/10/2007, Roberto Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just to make sure before I submit a bug report: when GCC says that
> a certain variable _is_ (as opposed to _may be_) used uninitialized
> in this function, it means that it has proved that the variable
> is indeed used uninitialized, ri
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Snapshot gcc-4.2-20071011 is now available on
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20071011/
> and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
I ran this script manually and reenabled the generation of snap
Hi folks.
I have merged mainline (rev 129233) into the tuples branch.
All compile.exp tests succeed. No regressions. Nothing of interest.
Aldy
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Snapshot gcc-4.2-20071011 is now available on
>> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20071011/
>> and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
>
> I ran this sc
I'm working on a patch to the top level configure to detect if inhibit_libc
will set for gcc and to avoid trying to build certain libraries in that
case.
I started to just clone the inhibit_libc logic from the gcc/configure,
but as
Ian commented, it is a bit strange. Then I realized that build-
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
>The only features in the printf-family of functions that depends on the
>locale are the conversion with thousand grouping ("%'d"), and glibc
>extension of using locale's alternative output digits ("%Id").
The entire parsing of the format string is affected by the multi
12 matches
Mail list logo