Re: C++: operator new and disabled exceptions

2007-09-28 Thread Christian BRUEL
hello, there is a difference between calling new and new (std::nothrow) from a fno-exceptions context: - new (std::nothrow) would return 0 in case of error - new () would throw std::bad_alloc that would finish in std::terminate() or abort() so there is a possible difference in behavior if a

Re: GCC 4.2.2 RC2 (finally)

2007-09-28 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 28/09/2007, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm finally spinning GCC 4.2.2 RC2. > > Please do not make any further check-ins to the GCC 4.2 branch, even > those that have been previously approved, without my explicit approval. > > I apologize to everyone for the delay in bringing out

C++: operator new and disabled exceptions

2007-09-28 Thread Christophe LYON
Hello, I have already asked this question on gcc-help (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2007-09/msg00328.html), but I would like advice from GCC developers. Basically, when I compile with -fno-exceptions, I wonder why the G++ compiler still generates calls to the standard new operator (th

RE: MetaHTML and the GCC web site

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Korn
On 28 September 2007 18:07, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: >> On 28 September 2007 17:10, François-Xavier Coudert wrote: >>> PS: The compilation error I get, if that rings a bell to someone who >>> installed metahtml on the webserver, is in libmhtml: >> so maybe try escaping the line ends

RE: MetaHTML and the GCC web site

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Korn
On 28 September 2007 17:10, François-Xavier Coudert wrote: > PS: The compilation error I get, if that rings a bell to someone who > installed metahtml on the webserver, is in libmhtml: > > Compiling pagefuncs.c into pagefuncs.o > gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wshadow -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.

Re: testsuite for libgomp and so on...

2007-09-28 Thread Andrew Pinski
On 9/27/07, Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > libcpp has a testsuite of sorts, GCC's testsuite. ;-) Plus part of GCC's testsuite, there is a preprocessor testcases which are located at gcc.dg/cpp . libssp is tested by two testcases in the gcc testsuite, gcc.dg/ssp-1.c and gcc.dg/ssp-2.c (

Fwd: MetaHTML and the GCC web site

2007-09-28 Thread François-Xavier Coudert
Hi all, I'm currently rewriting the fortran/ part of the GCC website and trying to use the website preprocessor locally, to check my modifications (which include bringing fortran/ to the website common style). The script needs mhc, which seems to be the metahtml compiler. I tried to compile metaht

Re: MetaHTML and the GCC web site

2007-09-28 Thread Joel Sherrill
Dave Korn wrote: On 28 September 2007 17:10, François-Xavier Coudert wrote: PS: The compilation error I get, if that rings a bell to someone who installed metahtml on the webserver, is in libmhtml: Compiling pagefuncs.c into pagefuncs.o gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wshadow -g -DHAVE_CON

Re: Profile information - CFG

2007-09-28 Thread Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
On 9/27/07, Hariharan Sandanagobalane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I am implementing support for PBO on picochip port of GCC (not yet > submitted to mainline). > > I see that GCC generates 2 files, xx.gcno and xx.gcda, containing the > profile information, the former containing the flow gr

gcc-4.3-20070928 is now available

2007-09-28 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20070928 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20070928/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Ada bootstrap broken

2007-09-28 Thread John David Anglin
This change breaks Ada: 2007-09-27 Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * varasm.c (compare_constant): Removed call to ... * langhooks-def.h (lhd_return_tree): Removed. (LANG_HOOKS_EXPAND_CONSTANT): Removed. (LANG_HOOKS_INITIALIZER): Removed LANG_HOOKS_EXPAND_C

Re: AltiVec stack boundary

2007-09-28 Thread Geoffrey Keating
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm sure this has come up before, but I don't understand how the > -maltivec definition of STACK_BOUNDARY can be right. We tell the > compiler that STACK_BOUNDARY == 128 if -maltivec, without telling it > that other people may ignore that, because -

GCC 4.2.2 RC2 Available

2007-09-28 Thread Mark Mitchell
GCC 4.2.2 RC2 is now available from: ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2.2-RC-20070927y If you want to help test this release candidate, please download files from the directory given above, rather than checking out from SVN, so that we can catch any packaging problems. If you find proble

Re: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

2007-09-28 Thread Geoffrey Keating
"Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 23 August 2007 22:34, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > > I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is > > a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same > > code independent of whether or not we're compilin

Re: GCC 4.2.2 RC2 Available

2007-09-28 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 29/09/2007, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > GCC 4.2.2 RC2 is now available from: > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2.2-RC-20070927y > > If you want to help test this release candidate, please download files > from the directory given above, rather than checking out from SV

Re: GCC 4.2.2 RC2 Available

2007-09-28 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
> > that we can catch any packaging problems. If you find problems, > > please file them in the GCC bug-tracker. See: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html > > > > for instructions regarding fixing bugs. You may CC: me on the bug > > report, but please do not send mail directly to me about prob

Re: tgmath.h and newlib

2007-09-28 Thread Geoffrey Keating
Richard Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry if this has been discussed before, but the c99-tgmath-* tests > are failing on most newlib targets. The problem is that tgmath.h > unconditionally includes complex.h, which non-linux newlibs don't > provide. What's the best fix? Including co

Re: Ada bootstrap broken

2007-09-28 Thread Ollie Wild
On 9/28/07, John David Anglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This change breaks Ada: Sorry, folks. I've rolled this back. Ollie