Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Richard Guenther
On 9/23/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ># all tests fail with ICE in verify_curr_properties; -m32/-m64 > >-O2 -fno-tree-salias > >-Os -fno-tree-salias > > > Known. This is normally the first place we build aliasing info. > Unless we have a compelling reason to have this flag, we sh

Cambio de direccion.

2007-09-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Este correo ha sido cambiado, favor enviar a: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gracias

Register Allocation Reviewers

2007-09-23 Thread David Edelsohn
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed Peter Bergner, Andrew MacLeod, Vladimir Makarov, Seongbae Park, and Ken Zadeck as GCC Register Allocation Reviewers. Please join me in congratulating Peter, Andrew, Vlad, Seongbae and Ken on their new role. Ple

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 9/23/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ># all tests fail with ICE in verify_curr_properties; -m32/-m64 > > >-O2 -fno-tree-salias > > >-Os -fno-tree-salias > > > > > > Known. This is normally the first place we build aliasing info.

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Richard Guenther
On 23 Sep 2007 09:13:59 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 9/23/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ># all tests fail with ICE in verify_curr_properties; -m32/-m64 > > > >-O2 -fno-tree-salias > > > >-Os -fno-tr

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We've got a test case with gcc 4.2 for which compilation time goes > > from nine minutes to 30 seconds when we use that option. I know the > > code is much better in mainline. Still, I would prefer to keep the > > option unless we are certain th

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Richard Guenther
On 23 Sep 2007 09:54:29 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > We've got a test case with gcc 4.2 for which compilation time goes > > > from nine minutes to 30 seconds when we use that option. I know the > > > code is much better

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23 Sep 2007 09:54:29 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well, if the -fno-tree-salias flag now causes wrong-code bugs then I > > certainly agree that it should be eliminated. > > I didn't say that ;) But I cert

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Richard Guenther
On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 23 Sep 2007 09:54:29 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Well, if the -fno-tree-salias flag now causes wrong-code bugs then I > > > certainly agr

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 23 Sep 2007 09:54:29 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Well, if the -fno-t

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Richard Guenther
On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 23 Sep 2007 09:54:29 -0700, Ian Lance Ta

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Am I wrong? I have the same problem

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Richard Guenther
On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am not so concerned about efficiency ATM, I am trying to build SSA at O0. > > If you only want simple SSA you should look at doing expansion after > early optimization.

Re: Bug in gcc: assignment to non-lvalue

2007-09-23 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
Jonathan Wakely wrote: I believe Andrew's right and the strcpy case is valid, but you do have a point. I think this should be rejected: struct A { int i; }; struct B { A get() { return A(); } }; int main () { B b; b.get().i = 0; // int& error = b.get().i; } What about somethin

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Daniel Berlin
On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 23 Sep 2007 09:54:29 -0700, Ian Lance Ta

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk

2007-09-23 Thread Daniel Berlin
On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PRO

gcc crosscompile for PPC, Please help!

2007-09-23 Thread ashok
Hi All, I wanted to install gcc-3.4 on my ppc-linux m/c. I tried cross compiling, but cought up with error which i'm not familiar with as i'm new here. The following is the error log on make: - [EMAIL