bootstrap with current svn head fails for me on Linux/x86-64:
/abuild/aj/gcc/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/abuild/aj/gcc/./prev-gcc/
-B/opt/gcc/4.3-devel/x86_64-suse-linux-gnu/bin/ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition
-Wmissing-for
On 11 Sep 2007 18:14:21 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 9/9/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Which brings back the fact that you cannot implement malloc in C
> > > (you certainly remember the dis
Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bootstrap with current svn head fails for me on Linux/x86-64:
...
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> /cvs/gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/treelang/treetree.c:1191: error:
> ‘treelang_expand_function’ defined but not used
> make[3]: *** [treelang/treetree.o] E
> Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > bootstrap with current svn head fails for me on Linux/x86-64:
> ...
> > cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> > /cvs/gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/treelang/treetree.c:1191: error:
> > ???treelang_expand_function??? defined but not used
> > make[3]: *** [tr
On 9/11/07, Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It does look like loop-iv.c is broken though. Every
> simplify_gen_relational call uses SImode. That probably should be
> word_mode instead. You might want to submit a bug report for that.
I think even using word_mode there is wrong. An examp
I have two patch may be worth to enter into 4.3 at stage 2.
Jan and I tried to ping the first part now about some time and we didn't
got a comment or approval for them.
See
http://www.nabble.com/-PING%5E2-PATCH-%3A-Preparations-for-SYSV-MS-ABI-attributes-in-backend-tf4414541.html
http://www.nabbl
I have to make buying decisions, and having tested a Sun T1000 for a
while I am impressed with Suns hardware. But, we are 100% gnu/linux and
it disturbs me that David Miller seems to be a (very impressive) team of
1 on the sparclinux ML (My impression; perhaps I am wrong?)
So I wonder, is Sun putt
From: Andrew Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:37:03 +0100
> I have to make buying decisions, and having tested a Sun T1000 for a
> while I am impressed with Suns hardware. But, we are 100% gnu/linux and
> it disturbs me that David Miller seems to be a (very impressive) team of
Hi,
I apologize for the late response to your mail but I sort of did these
patches up recently .
I have a couple of patches that I submitted / intend to submit . One
of them was submitted today regarding a small improvement to the
auto-increment pass. I am not sure if this is suitable for stage3
David Miller wrote:
>
> So no, Sun really isn't helping with any actual development.
>
I don't know what to say. Incredible work David, but quite frankly, I'm
speechless.
I'm sure I can't be the only hardware purchaser asking these questions.
I really like the Niagra and the successors sound ev
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Andrew Walrond wrote:
David Miller wrote:
So no, Sun really isn't helping with any actual development.
I don't know what to say. Incredible work David, but quite frankly, I'm
speechless.
I'm sure I can't be the only hardware purchaser asking these questions.
I really l
Andrew Walrond wrote:
>
> I'm trying to conceive a valid business reason for Sun to be so
> dismissive of the (surely massive?) gnu/linux hardware market, (even if
> they would rather we used Solaris), but it eludes me completely.
They are putting a lot of effort into linux on Intel and AMD. 18 y
"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_EXPR has the target type, of course. So perhaps
> > we need __attribute__ ((change_dynamic_type))?
> >
> > Or actually of course __attribute__ ((malloc)) is fine but we could
> > throw in a CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_EXPR after any c
On 12 Sep 2007 08:13:31 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_EXPR has the target type, of course. So perhaps
> > > we need __attribute__ ((change_dynamic_type))?
> > >
> > > Or actually of course __attribute
Tehila asked me a while ago to comment based on my experience with the
RTL if convert pass and the discussions some of us had at the GCC
summit. Sorry it took me so long to respond.
The target I care about (Cell SPU) has some things that make an
aggressive if convert very useful and profitable.
Kai Tietz wrote:
> See
> http://www.nabble.com/-PING%5E2-PATCH-%3A-Preparations-for-SYSV-MS-ABI-attributes-in-backend-tf4414541.html
> http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH-%3A-Implementation-for-SYSV-MS-ABI-attributes-in-i386-may-before-stage--3-tf4428449.html
Thanks for letting me know. I'm going to le
Maybe you would find what you want at the following URL:
http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=46448222
gccfss means 'GCC for SPARC System'
2007/9/12, Andrew Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have to make buying decisions, and having tested a Sun T1000 for a
> while I am impressed with Suns
17 matches
Mail list logo
