Hi all,
I am interested in being able to "mark-up" C++ code with special
meta-information. This is kind of like the existing __attribute__ for GCC but
the semantics are quite different (I.e. Not just function/type level but
statement level meta-data). I wish to ask if anyone knows of anything e
Hi,
(This message is a duplicate of a message to `gcc-help' where I did not
get a definitive answer[*].)
I read parts of Drepper's [0] and Oliva's [1] work on TLS access. From
my understanding, the `initial-exec' model can be used safely when
compiling an executable. However, it's still unclear
On 06 August 2007 02:13, Rodolfo Lima wrote:
> Rodolfo Schulz de Lima escreveu:
>> Dave Korn escreveu:
>>> Thanks, and do drop a note back with a summary of what you find out over
>>> there when you're done; if there's definitely a bug in gcc's
>>> understanding of the resolution rules, obviousl
Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/07/2007 18:05:53:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > > 2. Store-sinking/load hoisting may have an overhead and may degrade
> > > performance unless the relevant conditional branch gets if-converted.
> >
> > I agree with you for co
Is there any reason why this contribution from Mikkel Krautz is still
not in the current sources?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01592.html
Hans Kester
===
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of
"Hans Kester " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
> they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
> notify Ellips B.V. This message contains conf
Hi,
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Tehila Meyzels wrote:
> > in if-conv (or phi-opt), but in ssa-sink (or some similar transformation
> > which can or can not use value numbers and the like).
>
> OK.
>
> And what's your opinion WRT conditional loads/stores?
> Since you've sent your conditional store trans
Tristan Wibberley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've found a case which looks like it should be possible to optimise but
> gcc (very recent trunk) isn't doing which could give improvements in
> many cases - certainly in a case I've come across:
Looks reasonable to me. Please open a missed-optimi
I am running into a problem running the gfortran.dg/c_kind_params.f90
and am wondering how to address it. This test has a C language
component in gfortran.dg/c_kinds.c. This C file includes stdint.h and
uses types like int32_t and int64_t. On HPPA HP-UX platforms we don't
have a stdint.h header
> > 2007-07-23 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * configure.ac (TOPLEVEL_CONFIGURE_ARGUMENTS, baseargs):
> > Pass --silent if $silent.
Ok.
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 07:38 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Tristan Wibberley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've found a case which looks like it should be possible to optimise but
> > gcc (very recent trunk) isn't doing which could give improvements in
> > many cases - certainly in a case I'
On 8/6/07, Tristan Wibberley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance of moving to launchpad.net?
And launchpad.net forces everyone else to remember a new username and password.
Anyways the username for gcc bugzilla is your email address.
-- Pinski
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:08:04PM +0100, Tristan Wibberley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 07:38 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > Tristan Wibberley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I've found a case which looks like it should be possible to optimise but
> > > gcc (very recent trunk) isn't d
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 10:28 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I am running into a problem running the gfortran.dg/c_kind_params.f90
> and am wondering how to address it. This test has a C language
> component in gfortran.dg/c_kinds.c. This C file includes stdint.h and
> uses types like int32_t and int
> Any chance of moving to launchpad.net?
And launchpad.net forces everyone else to remember a new username
and password.
Launchpad is also non-free software.
> and the test runs on powerpc64-linux for both -m32 and -m64. Did
> you have it in a different position? If so I'll try that and see
> if I can figure out why it would be skipped. Also, which target
> were you testing?
I was testing on an IA64 Linux platform (Debian). I had this:
! { dg-do r
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:16 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > and the test runs on powerpc64-linux for both -m32 and -m64. Did
> > you have it in a different position? If so I'll try that and see
> > if I can figure out why it would be skipped. Also, which target
> > were you testing?
>
> I was te
[ CVS HEAD's ltmain.sh containing as first line:
# Generated from ltmain.m4sh; do not edit by hand
]
* DJ Delorie wrote on Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:09:09PM CEST:
>
> > I don't think this is much of a problem. ltmain.sh is always
> > distributed with libtool and you would need the full libtool s
> Yes. I tried it in the order your used, and the compile to check
> for inttypes.h tried to also compile c_kinds.c, which wasn't
> available from where the compile was done. In general it's best
> to check effective targets before adding files or options, unless
> the options are required for th
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20070806 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20070806/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
I was looking at PR tree-optimization/32941 after seeing a bootstrap
failure on my IA64 Linux box. I was wondering if anyone knows why it
has started failing now? It looks like this sorting of the goto queue
has been around for quite a while (since 4.1 at least). Do we have more
goto's than we
Hi people,
I'm looking for simulators of 64-bit processors for my 32-bit PC and
i've found one.
"qemu-system-x86_64" works simulating a x86-64 linux as slamd64, ubuntu, etc.
http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/status.html indicates that x86-64
is OK for System emulation but is not supported for
This doesn't really have much to do with GCC. Perhaps you'd like to ask
on comp.arch?
Ben
23 matches
Mail list logo
