Hi Nickolas,
Nicolas Alt wrote on 02.08.2007 03:51:35:
> Kai,
> did you make your diff against the current CVS checkout or against
> your first patch? Should your changes already work for some cases? I
> would like to test if they produce the right instructions. However, I
> do not have enough
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ltmain.sh starts with this line:
>
> # Generated from ltmain.m4sh; do not edit by hand
>
> but we don't seem to have ltmain.m4sh in the source tree.
I don't think this is much of a problem. ltmain.sh is always
distributed with libtool and you would need t
On Tuesday, 31. July 2007, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> Therefore, IMHO the patch is wrong and should be reverted.
> Or am I missing something?
I don't have access to a newer version of the language standard either. I
couldn't find a different case that is comparable to this one either (for
example
> How can we have a PLUS on a CONST_DOUBLE and a CONST_INT? That does
> not make sense, as there is no MODE argument that could make this work
> correctly. From your description, MODE must be some integer mode, in
> which case it is wrong to be using a CONST_DOUBLE in SFmode.
>
> (I don't know wh
> reg:SI 140 is known to have the constant value
> (const_int -2147483648 [0x8000]))
Wasnt clear maybe in my previous post. reg:SI 140 is known to have
this const_int value from a previous copy into it - here
(insn 19 17 20 2 /fc3/scratchpad/testcase-min.i:8 (set (reg:SI 140)
(const_in
On 01/08/07, Dirk Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 31. July 2007, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>
> So, assuming that this hasn't changed in a newer standard then I guess you're
> right and the check should only be a warning with -pedantic, (and
> no -pedantic-errors) given. This is howeve
Hello,
Találtam egy jó oldalt megéri megnézni. http://sunfly.puresms.hu
Hameg nem tetszik akkor ott hagyod, de megnézni érdemes.
Ãdv. Kláry
"Pranav Bhandarkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How can we have a PLUS on a CONST_DOUBLE and a CONST_INT? That does
> > not make sense, as there is no MODE argument that could make this work
> > correctly. From your description, MODE must be some integer mode, in
> > which case it is wrong t
> I don't think this is much of a problem. ltmain.sh is always
> distributed with libtool and you would need the full libtool sources to
> rebuild it anyway.
I was thinking more of the legality of shipping GPL files without
their sources, being defined as "the preferred form of the work for
maki
Hello,
The summary of the BOF regarding floating point arithmetic in GCC from
the summit can be found in the following wiki page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FP_BOF
Thanks,
Revital
Hi all,
I have detected a bug in C++ frontend.
When compiling a function with parameter of a pointer to a vector constant
type, the compiler calls a recursive function and is not able to get out.
Concretely, in gcc/cp/mangle.c file, in function write_type:
if (write_CV_qualifiers_for_type
On 8/2/07, Sa Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have detected a bug in C++ frontend.
This used to work. Can you file a bug at the very least?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
"Andrew Pinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02.08.2007 19:36:30:
> This used to work. Can you file a bug at the very least?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
I have opened a bug against it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32970
Sa
On 01 August 2007 16:00, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>>>Is there a way to allow the testsuite to just run regardless of
>>>how long it takes?
>>
>> I think you need to pass "set timeout -1" into dejagnu. I'd suggest a
>> larger positive timeout instead.
>>
>> I forg
Hello,
I just add a new mirror. The server is located at US (Dallas, 100mb
connection). I am doing daily upate on this mirror. Here is the url:
http://gcc.site2nd.org/gcc/
It's a little thing that I can do to contribute to the community.
If you have any question, just let me know. Thanks.
Max
15 matches
Mail list logo
