Hi,
RTV/N instruction is one of the new instructions added in the SH2A
target.
Description : RTV/N instruction performs a return from a subroutine
procedure after a transfer from specified general register Rn to R0.
That is, after the Rn value is stored in R0, the PC is restored from
PR, and pr
Hi Andrew,
after applying the patch the problem was fixed!
crafty 'works' after -fprofile-generate/-use like a charm (again)!
Thank you :-)
Best regards,
Thomas
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On 7/16/07, Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't have time right now to lo
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:12:19PM +0530, Naveen H.S. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> RTV/N instruction is one of the new instructions added in the SH2A
> target.
>
> Description : RTV/N instruction performs a return from a subroutine
> procedure after a transfer from specified general register Rn to R0.
> Tha
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 02:39:39PM -, Wolfram Gloger wrote:
> > > int *p;
> > > p = malloc (4);
> > > *p = 0;
> > > p = realloc (p, 4);
> > > *p = 1;
> >
> > By that reasoning, consider:
> >
> > int *p;
> > p = malloc (4);
> > *p = 0;
> > free(p);
> > p = malloc (4);
> > *p = 1;
>
>
> > For that matter, I doubt the FSF would answer either.
>
> But this is simpler; the FSF publishes the releases, so anyone can
> compare what they got with what the FSF published, and then ask the
> distributor "do you hold the copyright for these differences?"
But many companies won't even let
> > If A obtains software from the FSF and distributes it to B, who
> > distributes it to C who, in turn, distributes it to D, there is a
> > license between A and the FSF, B and C, C and B, and D and C.
>
> If it were so and any of them infringes on the license, then all
> downstream users would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) writes:
>> Seems simple: the COPYING file contains the conditions, and all files
>> have the same as well. And it's all directly from the copyright holder.
>
> Except quite often it ISN'T direct from the copyright holder. E.g., a
> RedHat or Debian distribution.
On 7/14/07 7:14 PM, Kannan Goundan wrote:
> - A (0,5)
> - B (1,1)
> - C (2,4)
> - D (3,3)
> - E (4,4)
> - F (5,5)
> - G (6,7)
> - H (7,7)
>
> A given instance is of type "C" if its "code" field is between 2 and 4,
> inclusive.
Interesting, thanks. In this case, we probably shou
Hi All,
On behalf of Sean I've made the initial commit to the gcc plugin
branch. This work directly applies to the paper that he'll be giving
at the summit this week. If people want to try out the code and or
just look and see what direction he's going. If you have any questions
or commen
John --
RMS has OK'd adding the license exception to fptr.c and milli64.s.
Please apply your patch. It is OK to do this on the 4.2 branch, too,
even though that's otherwise locked down for release. However, I will
not be doing an RC3, so please make sure that the files still compile
with the cha
I plan to spin the GCC 4.2.1 release tomorrow.
Please do not make any further changes to the branch.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
I am working on the testsuite for a new crosscompiler hosted on x86
Platform,
While performing execute test using gcc testsuite,
I am getting the error message in execute test
/tmp/2112-1.x0: /tmp/2112-1.x0: cannot execute binary file
I know, have to use cross compiler simulator, for
Hi,
>> My first shot at this would be to emit RTV/N in a dummy form as
>> part of the epilogue and leave the usual Rn--->R0 setup as it is,
>> producing
>> (set (reg R0) (reg Rn))
...
>> (parallel [
>> (set (reg R0) (reg R0))
>> (return)
>> ])
>> and hope that the rnreg pass changes t
13 matches
Mail list logo
