Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?

2007-06-03 Thread Ben Elliston
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 18:48 -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > > When was decimal floating point added to gcc? I couldn't find it > > > in any gcc changes.html. Shouldn't it be mentioned somewhere? > Are they mentioned in any gcc changes.html? No, they're not. They probably should be. Ben

Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?

2007-06-03 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Ben Elliston wrote: >> Are they mentioned in any gcc changes.html? > No, they're not. They probably should be. Do you think we could talk the submitters/maintainers into donating a patch? :-) Gerald

Help in understanding ccp propagator

2007-06-03 Thread Revital1 Eres
Hello, I will greatly appreciate any suggestions regarding the following problem I have with the ccp propagator. I am testing the new store ccp patch which propagates constants by walking the virtual use-def chain (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00055.html) and I encountered the fol

Re: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x?

2007-06-03 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
"Deepen Mantri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] > To enable libmudflap library, I am passing the "--enable-libmudflap" > option in the gcc configure script But I get the following error > during final gcc building: > "configure error: none of the known symbol names works > [configure-target-l

Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator

2007-06-03 Thread Daniel Berlin
On 6/3/07, Revital1 Eres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I will greatly appreciate any suggestions regarding the following problem I have with the ccp propagator. I am testing the new store ccp patch which propagates constants by walking the virtual use-def chain (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pa

Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history

2007-06-03 Thread Gabriel Paubert
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:57:36AM -0400, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > Gabriel Paubert wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:00:29AM -0400, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > >>Gabriel Paubert wrote: > >> > >>>I just upgraded my git to 1.5.2 and repacked the git repository > >>>with git-gc --aggressive. It

Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history

2007-06-03 Thread Harvey Harrison
On 6/3/07, Gabriel Paubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, actually the GCC repository does not pack better here than yours. It's even worse after having tested on 3 different machines just in case. In all cases I get about 1.4 GB for the pack with the default depth and window parameters. The

Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history

2007-06-03 Thread Bernardo Innocenti
Harvey Harrison wrote: I get about 1.4 GB for the pack with the default depth and window parameters. I forgot to mention that I obtained an ~800MB repository with git 1.5.0.x after increasing the window size to 20. The defaults changed significantly somewhere near version 1.5.1 I believe w

Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history

2007-06-03 Thread Harvey Harrison
On 6/3/07, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Harvey Harrison wrote: >> I get about 1.4 GB for the pack with the default >> depth and window parameters. I forgot to mention that I obtained an ~800MB repository with git 1.5.0.x after increasing the window size to 20. Now I don't

Libjava is broken again

2007-06-03 Thread H. J. Lu
This patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg00151.html breaks libjava. One problem is it modifies libjava/classpath/m4/acinclude.m4 without ChangeLog entry. I believe this one - if test "x${GCJ}" = x && test "x${JIKES}" = x && test "x${user_specified_javac}" != xkjc && test "x${u