On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 15:29 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Andrew --
>
> I'm trying to firm up GCC 4.3 planning a bit. One of the things I'm
> considering is whether or not the POINTER_PLUS branch should be merged
> as part of 4.3. My understanding from looking at your emails is that
> the branch
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:14:51PM +, R. D. Flowers, Chattanooga TN USA
wrote:
I think we should use parentheses to enforce the order.
I could be missing something here, and it is almost separate statements,
and might be ugly, but -- comma clauses?
fo
Lu
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:10:57AM +, R. D. Flowers, Chattanooga TN USA
wrote:
>
> Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> >On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:14:51PM +, R. D. Flowers, Chattanooga TN
> >USA wrote:
> >
> >>foo=term1,foo+=term2,foo+=term3 ... ;
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#nonbug
Hi,
I'm working on a new target port in which there are different base
registers
allowed depending on the offset:
r0-r7 are allowed as base register only when the offset is zero.
r6-r7 are allowed as base register for every offset.
I'm wondering if gcc is prepared for such scenario, examine the
Hi,
LSDA (Language Specific Data Area) is used to store exception handling
information at the exception catch site, see
http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/exceptions.pdf.
For various kinds of binary analyzers (translators, optimizers) it is
useful to be able to interpret the LSDA of a given C++
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:56:38PM +0300, Tal Agmon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a new target port in which there are different base
> registers
> allowed depending on the offset:
> r0-r7 are allowed as base register only when the offset is zero.
> r6-r7 are allowed as base register for every
"Rohit Arul Raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have defined a target hook TARGET_EXPAND_BUILTIN_SAVEREGS (GCC
> 4.1.1) as an alternative to TARGET_SETUP_INCOMING_VARARGS so as to
> code ___builtin_saveregs as per my target. But this target hook is not
> getting recognized.
>
> Is there anything
Andrew Pinski wrote:
I cleaned up the code today so it basically ready to be merged, some
(most?) of the target headers still need to be fixed for the change.
The list of targets which need to be changed is:
alpha ia64 mips pa
s390sparcstormy16xtensa
I don't have acc
Yaakov Yaari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> LSDA (Language Specific Data Area) is used to store exception handling
> information at the exception catch site, see
> http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/exceptions.pdf.
>
> For various kinds of binary analyzers (translators, optimizers) it is
> useful
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:29:33AM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 02:06:21PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
> >> I have to look into bugzilla 3.0 migration first though. Bugzilla 3.0
> >> introduces a custom
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Chao-Ying, I'm also interested in whether or not these changes have any
impact on C++. With your changes, does GNU C++ now accept any
fixed-point constructs?
Chao-ying's on vacation this week. AFAIK Chao-ying's code does nothing explicit
to support, or not support, C++
> If we segfault for printf("%d\n", 2+2), the bug would not be in this
> category. If we printed 5, it would be.
So what if the printf statement is executed only once every leap year?
What if it segfaults only if you have one out of several thousand
address space randomization patterns?
Your dis
...as of rev 125166.
No surprises.
Aldy
Hello,
I read that the eh_frame is for exceptions support,
for languages like C++ for instance.
I wonder why when I compile standard C programs using "gcc -v simple.c"
I can see that the linker adds the "--eh-frame-hdr" parameter ?
After all there is no use for the eh section when we don't supp
Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> 1. Add a field to bugzilla for the SVN revision at which a particular
>> regression was introduced. Display that in bugzilla as a link to the
>> online SVN history browser so that clicking on a link takes us from the
>> PR straight to the checkin. This field value ought t
"sfora dim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I read that the eh_frame is for exceptions support,
> for languages like C++ for instance.
Yes.
> I wonder why when I compile standard C programs using "gcc -v simple.c"
> I can see that the linker adds the "--eh-frame-hdr" parameter ?
That option is al
On 5/29/07, Jeffrey Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't followed PTR_PLUS development at all -- what specifically
spurred you to hack on this Andrew?
For spu-elf, good alignment information is needed for each load/store
as each load/store is only done on 128bit alignment. Since we lose a
On May 25, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Thomas Neumann wrote:
Unfortunately reviewing as been, ahem, a bit slow.
:-( I'd ask if the SC has had any luck finding suitable reviewers
yet... I do think Fortran has about the right number judging from the
latency on patch review. They have about 1 review
On 5/29/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:29:33AM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 02:06:21PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
.
>
> You can customize what fields are shown on
Can anyone explain exactly how and when the file...
gcc/fixincludes/tests/base/architecture/ppc/math.h
is used when building gcc on Darwin PPC? I ask because I
just noticed that it contains the remapping of the long
double math calls to use the appended $LDBL128 suffix.
I am wondering if it is
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Dorit Nuzman, Richard Guenther, and Zdenek Dvorak as
Auto-Vectorizer maintainers.
Please join me in congratulating Dorit, Richard, and Zdenek on their
new role. Please update your listings in the MAINTAINERS fi
On 29 May 2007 15:27:43 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder why when I compile standard C programs using "gcc -v simple.c"
> I can see that the linker adds the "--eh-frame-hdr" parameter ?
That option is always used if the linker supports it.
> After all there is no us
23 matches
Mail list logo
