> In toplevel, svn up -r 124763 Makefile.tpl Makefile.def Makefile.in
I used the files from trunk revision 124627 and the build went fine.
I'll try to find some time to fill a PR
Dominique
I got the second one too. Italians must be good at acronyms. :-)
IMBGAA!
...BTTOWWTD!!!
PBTMAICFOTL (Probably better than me as I cannot figure out the latter).
On the other hand, it may mean that we can skip stage2 altogether, since
we had stage2 during stage1 for 4.3...
I'm definitely
Hi,
I have added to the wiki the list of Google's SoC projects for this
year. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode
From my experience of last year, I would recommend to create a wiki
page for your project to dump anything that could be remotely useful
and to allow people to add comments. You c
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:24:11AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:00:13PM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> >I don't see how emit_move_complex_push() can ever generate a push
> > instruction. Here's a backtrace:
>
> emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_MEM (submode, X
Hello,,
When I do "gcc foo.c", behind the scenes I suppose there
are many actions, like calling 'cpp', 'gcc', 'as' and finally, 'ld'.
Is there a way to know what is going on exactly behind the
scenes of gcc ?
Like which other tools are called and with which command line
arguments ?
Thank You
su
On 20 May 2007 17:40, Sunzir Deepur wrote:
> Hello,,
>
> When I do "gcc foo.c", behind the scenes I suppose there
> are many actions, like calling 'cpp', 'gcc', 'as' and finally, 'ld'.
>
> Is there a way to know what is going on exactly behind the
> scenes of gcc ?
> Like which other tools are c
all, sorry for the misplaced (and trivial) question, won't happen again.
thank you for the nice attitude though !
sunzir.
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
In toplevel, svn up -r 124763 Makefile.tpl Makefile.def Makefile.in
I used the files from trunk revision 124627 and the build went fine.
I'll try to find some time to fill a PR
I can confirm your hunting. Reverting the mentioned patch brings
bootstrap back on ppc-
> Thanks,
You're welcome!
This is PR32009.
Cheers
Dominique
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> ...BTTOWWTD!!!
>
> PBTMAICFOTL (Probably better than me as I cannot figure out the latter).
Never mind, it was meant to be impossible to decode: "But The Third
One Was Way Too Difficult" :-)
>> Would these have to go in now or later in 4.4?
>
> I would propose waiting f
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
(the next proposal is likely to cause some dissent)
What about moving 4.3 to stage 3 *now* and moving everything
else in 4.4 instead? Hopefully, it will be a matter of just
a few months. From http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html,
it looks like it would already be q
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:39:43PM -0700, Brooks Moses wrote:
> Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >(the next proposal is likely to cause some dissent)
> >What about moving 4.3 to stage 3 *now* and moving everything
> >else in 4.4 instead? Hopefully, it will be a matter of just
> >a few months. From htt
Hi
"Zuxy Meng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> 2007/3/11, Danny Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> > Behalf Of Zuxy Meng
>> > Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2007 12:36 a.m.
>>
>> >
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
