On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:16:59AM +0530, Rahul wrote:
> But for -O0 optimization, even the 'progname.c.*.combine file' is
> *not* getting generated for '-fdump-rtl-all / -fdump-rtl-combine'
> options.
The *.combine dumpfile is generated when the combine pass runs.
> Please tell me whether th
Hi all,
I need some clarification regarding the debug information generated
for var_args function. I am working with GCC 4.1.1. In my target,
var_args registers are saved in stack frame during function prologue
(similiar to fr30).
### sample program ###
#include
int fun(const char *temp,...)
Hey. I'm looking at some of the new fails on cygwin and AIX. Both of
these platforms have fails that don't happen on linux. These fails
look like:
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
/cygdrive/e/gnu/gcc-4.3-20070511/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/all_c++200x_compatibility.cc:1:
er
Hello,
Please excuse me if this email would have had its place on the bugzilla,
like for my poor English, but I met some erros while trying to compile
GCC-4.2.1. under windows xp, with an athlon-xp based pc.
First one appeard in gfortran.h.
It seems that uint is not recognized as a good typ
>
> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>
> /cygdrive/e/gnu/gcc-4.3-20070511/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_int
> ro/headers/all_c++200x_compatibility.cc:1:
> error: -ffunction-sections may affect debugging on some targets
>
This is actually a useful warning, since -ffunction-sections not on
This is actually a useful warning, since -ffunction-sections not only
affects debugging but also adds unnecessary size to executables on
PE-COFF targets (and others where ld does not support --gc-sections).
One way to avoid is to add --enable-cxx-flags='-fno-function-sections
-fno-data-sections
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
/cygdrive/e/gnu/gcc-4.3-20070511/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_int
ro/headers/all_c++200x_compatibility.cc:1:
error: -ffunction-sections may affect debugging on some targets
This is actually a useful warning, since -ffunction-sec
ok, I've created PR31937 related to the libffi bug and I've also
submitted a quick patch to the gcc-patches mailing list
Patrick
On 5/16/07, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 15, 2007, at 2:20 AM, Patrick Olinet wrote:
> Finally, I've tried it the dirty way, ie by commenting out all
>
> libstdc++ configure is already probing to see if the target
> supports the
> use of this flag without errors. It thinks AIX and cygwin can
> use this
> flag without errors or warnings, which is clearly wrong.
>
> So, something needs to be fixed.
>
> Can you try
>
> int i;
>
> with "-W
Weird. Does -std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x make a difference?
I'm trying to figure out why I see this warning/error for things like
17_intro/headers/all_c++200x_compatibility.cc
but not always.
-benjamin
This also occurred with the latest snapshot:
Configure syntax was:
./configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.3
Configure completed fine. Make is getting stuck at:
/part/build/mark/gcc/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/xgcc
-B/part/build/mark/gcc/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/
-B/opt/gcc-4.3/x86
In file included from ../.././libgcc/../libdecnumber/decContext.c:36:
../.././libgcc/../libdecnumber/decContext.h:52:50: error:
gstdint.h: No such file or directory
... lots of other errors ...
gstdint.h seems to be at:
/part/build/mark/gcc/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libdecnumber/
g
> > Can you try
> >
> > int i;
> >
> > with "-Werror -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections" and see if
> > you get an
> > error with g++?
>
> With GNU C++ version 4.3.0 20070513 (experimental)
> (i686-pc-mingw32dw2)
> No error. i is put in its own section .data$i
But error when I add "-g" to
On 5/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This also occurred with the latest snapshot:
Configure syntax was:
./configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.3
Configure completed fine. Make is getting stuck at:
You are compiling in the source directory which is not a well
supported way of
On May 16, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On 5/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This also occurred with the latest snapshot:
Configure syntax was:
./configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.3
Configure completed fine. Make is getting stuck at:
You are compiling in the s
Currently gcc 4.2.0 suffers from 90 libjava failures on i686-apple-darwin8
including the boehm gctest. Backporting the changes from revision 120684...
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=120684
as suggested in...
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.boeh
On May 16, 2007, at 8:00 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Currently gcc 4.2.0 suffers from 90 libjava failures on i686-
apple-darwin8
including the boehm gctest. Backporting the changes from revision
120684...
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=120684
as suggested in...
which include
17 matches
Mail list logo