Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine

Still, this shows that we did have an increase in memory use recently, which may be worth looking into. (And, of course, I'm happily testing Tom's patch as we speak.) I'd be curious to know the effect of removing the "complexity" field of struct tree_exp. It should be possible to bootstrap

Disabling bootstrap

Hi all, I've changed gcc by adding a new pass, however, when I compile gcc, during compilation it calls itself, so I disabled bootstrap but that is still happening even during bootstrap. Is there any way to compile gcc without the final gcc compiling something? Moreover, how can I add a flag to

PL/I for GCC version 0.0.14 release

February 2007 This is the fourteenth code drop of the GCC front-end for the PL/I programming language. PL/I for GCC is released under the terms of the GNU Public License; version 2. With pl1gcc-0.0.14 another important milestone has been reached. v0.0.14 is the first release where it is possibl

Re: Disabling bootstrap

Hello, > I've changed gcc by adding a new pass, however, when I compile gcc, > during compilation it calls itself, so I disabled bootstrap but that > is still happening even during bootstrap. Is there any way to compile > gcc without the final gcc compiling something? make stage1-bubble. See als

Re: Disabling bootstrap

On 2/2/07, Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, > I've changed gcc by adding a new pass, however, when I compile gcc, > during compilation it calls itself, so I disabled bootstrap but that > is still happening even during bootstrap. Is there any way to compile > gcc without the final

gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem

I was able to successfully build gcc-4.1.2-20070128 on alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu ia64-unknown-linux-gnu powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu i686-pc-linux-gnu however during 'make install' on the following architectures alphaev56-dec-osf4.0f alphaev

Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem

> however during 'make install' on the following architectures > > alphaev56-dec-osf4.0f > alphaev68-dec-osf5.1b > sparc-sun-solaris2.8 > i386-pc-solaris2.10 > i386-pc-solaris2.9 > > I ran into the following problem > > echo 'SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR="'"`echo /usr/include | sed -e

Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem

On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:23:01PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > dec-osf4.0f/4.1.2/install-tools/mkheaders.conf > > /bin/sh: : cannot execute > > /bin/sh: /]*/../,, -e ta: not found > > sed: Function s,[ cannot be parsed. > > That should not happen on Solaris if you set CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/ksh as

not building?

I've been seeing: /Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc-darwin/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/ Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc-darwin/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc- darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/libstdc++-v3/src -L/Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc- darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/usr/local/i686- a

Re: not building?

On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:19:57AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote: > I've been seeing: > > /Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc-darwin/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/ > Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc-darwin/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc- > darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/libstdc++-v3/src -L/Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc- >

Re: not building?

/Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled/extc++.h:43:29: error: ext/enc_filebuf.h: No such file or directory This was removed from the libstdc++ sources erroneously, and I just re-added it. It should appear in your sources, if they are up-to-date, in include/ext/enc_filebuf.h.

gcc-4.3-20070202 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.3-20070202 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20070202/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: How to get rid of attribute(mode(word))?

One target is to identify more places where we can get rid of _Unwind_Word. Other places exist where we definitely need a data type like _Unwind_Word representing a general purpose register. So we have to find a way to define _Unwind_Word without using the mode(word) attribute. So, I mi

Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem

Joe Buck wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:23:01PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: >>> dec-osf4.0f/4.1.2/install-tools/mkheaders.conf >>> /bin/sh: : cannot execute >>> /bin/sh: /]*/../,, -e ta: not found >>> sed: Function s,[ cannot be parsed. >> That should not happen on Solaris if you set CONFIG_SH

Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem

On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 04:15:05PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Joe Buck wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:23:01PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > >>> dec-osf4.0f/4.1.2/install-tools/mkheaders.conf > >>> /bin/sh: : cannot execute > >>> /bin/sh: /]*/../,, -e ta: not found > >>> sed: Function s,[

Re: not building?

On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: This was removed from the libstdc++ sources erroneously, and I just re-added it. Thanks, it works now.

Re: How to get rid of attribute(mode(word))?

Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > One target is to identify more places where we can get rid of > > _Unwind_Word. > > Other places exist where we definitely need a data type like > > _Unwind_Word > > representing a general purpose register. So we have to find a way > > to define >

Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem

Hello Kate, all, * Kate Minola wrote on Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:37:05PM CET: > > echo 'SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR="'"`echo /usr/include | sed -e :a -e > "s,[^/]*/\.\.\/,," > -e ta`"'"' \ >> >/home/kate/gcc-4.1.2-20070128/alpha-OSF1-V4/lib/gcc/alphaev56- > dec-osf4.0f/4.1.

Re: How to get rid of attribute(mode(word))?

There was a long discussion about this a couple of months ago. The summary was that __attribute__ ((mode (word))) was considered harmful. It's safe enough when you use it within a program, but when you start to use in a data structure shared by different codes you run into ABI problems. A typic