make -k -j 8 check >& check.log ; make mail-report-with-warnings.log
I got results that appear not much different from the powerpc-apple-
darwin8.8.0 (i.e., 32-bit) results:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-12/msg00267.html
i.e., these results don't show a particular fortran proble
> /* below I pass a the tree of the current_function_decl a global
> variable in tree.h */
> this_cfun = DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION(current_function_decl);
> FOR_EACH_BB_FN(bb, this_cfun) /* Crashes here, Also tried with
> FOR_EACH_BB */
> for (bsi = bsi_start(bb); !bsi_end_p(bsi); b
Hi Revital,
Because of doing copy, paste I forgot to delete one line from the CASE
1 example:
Instead:
> /* below I pass a the tree of the current_function_decl a global
> variable in tree.h */
> this_cfun = DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION(current_function_decl);
> FOR_EACH_BB_FN(bb, this_cfu
>
> And the code crashes at the macro FOR_EACH_BB_FN.. This is exatly as
> it is implemented in cgraph_create_edges() function.. but I think that
> the problem is because I call it at wrong time (too early, or too late
> - before or after parsing).. Could it be?
Yes. You can start by calling it
Hi again,
Yes. You can start by calling it in the same place cgraph_create_edges ()
is been called. (cgraph_analyze_function ())
To be able to do that, probably I will need to register a new token
(i.e. MY_PRAGMA_TOKEN) and build a node of this token within the
pragma handler (in c-pragma.c).
On 12/3/06, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Richie,
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Public monitoring would be more useful. If you have working single-file
> testcases that you want be monitored for compile-time and memory-usage
> just contact me and I can add them t
Hi All,
I am trying to understand certain EXPR nodes, when they are generated
and how code generated from them behaves in the resulting program.
The nodes that have me a little confused are:
TRY_CATCH_EXPR
TRY_FINALLY_EXPR
MUST_NOT_THROW_EXPR
EH_FILTER_EXPR
Note: I have read the GCC Internals d
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20061207 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20061207/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Toon Moene wrote:
I can measure the contribution of the cbrt effect in isolation, though
(given the above change of HIRLAM source code).
Well, the effect of the cbrt change (X ** (1./3.) -> cbrt(X)) is close
to zero.
Some other change must have diminished the number of pow[f] calls
substan
Brendon Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The nodes that have me a little confused are:
>
> TRY_CATCH_EXPR
> TRY_FINALLY_EXPR
> MUST_NOT_THROW_EXPR
> EH_FILTER_EXPR
Yes, those are a bit mysterious.
> TRY_CATCH_EXPR/TRY_FINALLY_EXPR
> When code generated from these nodes encounter an exceptio
Thanks for the reply. One thing that I didnt quite get...
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
TRY_CATCH_EXPR/TRY_FINALLY_EXPR
If operand 0 throws an exception, there is an implicit rethrow after
executing operand 1. (Of course, operand 1 can prevent that rethrow
by doing its own throw, or by callin
Hi,
I am trying to build LMBench v3.0 with ELDK (Embedded Linux Development
Kit) for ARM Linux cross compiler (GCC 4.1). For a particular file
(lat_ops.c) in LMBench, the cross compiler hangs. It worked well with
compiler version 3.3.2.
I am using Fedora core 4, Intel P4 machine and my target is AR
Brendon Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>TRY_CATCH_EXPR/TRY_FINALLY_EXPR
> >>
> >If operand 0 throws an exception, there is an implicit rethrow after
> >executing operand 1. (Of course, operand 1 can prevent that rethrow
> >by doing its own throw, or by calling a function which does not
> >r
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 10:24 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > I have reported no other bootstrap/regtests. So, depending on your
> > meaning, perhaps there has never been a "last good bootstrap".
> >
>
> Can you make testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.log available?
> I suspect that this is yet anot
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 17:19 +0100, Come Lonfils wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to know more about how messages are send to the objects in
> objective-C
Messages are send via a dynamic lookup using strings.
For the GNU runtime, objc_msg_lookup is called to get the function
pointer and then we cast it to
Hi all,
In case i have to support a new function attribute specifically for my target,
1. Do i have to modify the GCC source base like adding a new flag in
tree_function_decl(tree.h), adding a new handler to set the flag in
c-common.h.
or can i do it from the backend itself.
2. Any documentatio
16 matches
Mail list logo
