Re: regeneration of files

I commited the regenerated libgfortran files on mainline (rev. 118140): 2006-10-29 Francois-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * configure: Regenerate. * Makefile.in: Regenerate. * aclocal.m4: Regenerate. Maybe you have an old version of libgfortran/config.h.in, becaus

Build failure in dwarf2out

I am being hit by this: rf2out.c -o dwarf2out.o ../../trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c: In function `file_name_acquire': ../../trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:7672: error: `files' undeclared (first use in this f unction) ../../trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:7672: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ..

Re: Build failure in dwarf2out

Paul Thomas wrote: I am being hit by this: rf2out.c -o dwarf2out.o ../../trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c: In function `file_name_acquire': ../../trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:7672: error: `files' undeclared (first use in this f unction) ../../trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:7672: error: (Each undeclared identifier is re

Splay Tree

Could this patch be applied now? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-07/msg00210.html Discussion starts here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-07/msg00147.html (benchmarks are wrong) Original patch posted by Brian Makin here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00762.html Quote: I've been r

Re: Build failure in dwarf2out

Tim, My guess is that the #define activating that region of code is erroneously triggered. I am running the 2-day (on cygwin with a substandard BIOS) testsuite now. I decided to set it to #if 0 just as I saw your mail - it is now building just fine; I haven't tested it yet but I guess, since i

Bug? Exceptions and implicit constructors.

Hi all, Is this a bug in GCC or does the code below incorrectly use exceptions and virtual inheritance? I expect the code below to display: Constructing child2. Caught exception: 3 However it causes an abort after displaying the first line. Looking further into this i found that when GCC creat

Povray benchmark results

compile flags of "gcc version 4.3.0 20061029" were set to: -O3 -msse3 -ffast-math -march=k8 -mtune=k8 -minline-all-stringops Different -mpfmath selections were benchmarked: a) -mfpmath=sse user27m33.848s b) -mfpmath=387 user27m42.136s c) -mfpmath=sse,387 user26m0.312s The

Re: submitting patches before copyright assignment fully done?

Basile STARYNKEVITCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My copyright assignment is not yet signed, but I am pretty confident that it > will be signed (hopefully soon, and surely in 2006 ie before Christmas). > > Can I submit patches (to gcc-patches@) which are not trivial (ie more than > 10 lines of c

Re: wiki topics wish (configuration related)

> 0. I am not sure to understand exactly the steps (and commands to > run) when touching to a configure.ac file... I made an educated > guess which happens to work most of the time. (In particular it > seems that autconf2.60 works even if 2.59 is required) If you only modify `configure.ac', then i

Re: regeneration of files

> "Mike" == Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> I found quite a few files out of date... [...] Mike> libjava/configure I updated (svn trunk) and re-ran autoconf here, and didn't see any change. What version of autoconf are you using? I'm using the 2.59 that comes with FC5. Mike>

Re: Abt RTL expression - Optimization

Hi all, The problem due to which the below mentioned program was not working is because of CODE HOISTING pass. I just masked the code hoisting step and the program worked fine. 1. The instruction no's 11, 12, 13 are removed when -Os optimization is enabled (it considers n, h as dead). Is there a