Brendon Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I have a FUNCTION_DECL node that returns non-null for
> DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO() then it is a template or template instantiation.
> How can I tell if it is a full instantiation (I.e. not general
> template or partial specialisation)?
DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTAN
Brendon Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For each FUNCTION_DECL node I find, I want to determine what its
> exception specification list is. I.e. the throws() statement in its
> prototype.
Look at TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (FNDECL).
Ian
Hello all,
For targets which doesn't have simd hardware support like fr30 , simd stuff is
emulated?
Is there some flags/macros in gcc to indicate that?
How is it done in other targets which deosnt have the hardware support?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Shafi.
On 10/10/06, Jochen Haerdtlein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I am a PhD student working on the extended use of
expression templates for solving partial differential equations.
Thus, I did a lot of studying of expression templates papers,
articles and expression templates implementations.
GCC 3.2.3 has been built for MVS 3.8, MVS/XA, OS/390, Z/OS and VM/CMS.
You can find the modified source and binaries here:
http://www.softlib.org/GCCMVS/gccmvs.html
Only the C compiler has been ported.
BFN. Paul.
Hi all,
I am upgrading my cross-compiler from 3.4.6 to 4.1.1. It has built
successfully. But while running the test suites, one of the errors
that i was getting was due to the below mentioned file
20020611-1.c
/* PR target/6997. Missing (set_attr "cc" "none") in sleu pattern in
cris.md.
Hi, after reading [1] and [2] I'm a bit confused. I'd like to know how
I should go about building GCC such that I can choose between SJLJ and
ZCX at compile time, using --rts=sjlj. From [2] it looks like this is a
configure-time option only. Is it necessary to configure gcc twice and
produce two
Hi all,
I'm not sure whom to write about the workings of the GCC bugzilla
database, so I'm writing here and CCing Daniel Berlin, since IIRC he
handles part of that work.
I think it would be nice (although not high priority) to remove the
libf2c component in bugzilla, since we don't ship libf2c a
Hi all,
I am upgrading my cross-compiler from 3.4.6 to 4.1.1. It has built
successfully. But while running the test suites, one of the errors
that i was getting was due to the below mentioned file
20020611-1.c that too while optimizing for size Os.
/* PR target/6997. Missing (set_attr "cc" "none
Dear All,
I am still a newbie on GCC!
On the Wiki, http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/MiddleEnd I am trying to document very
briefly the passes on Gimple SSA trees
I do know about the chapter 8.4 (Tree SSA passes) of the GCC internal
documentation (but some of the passes are not listed there)
I cannot ye
Rohit Arul Raj writes:
> Hi all,
> I am upgrading my cross-compiler from 3.4.6 to 4.1.1. It has built
> successfully. But while running the test suites, one of the errors
> that i was getting was due to the below mentioned file
> 20020611-1.c that too while optimizing for size Os.
On what arc
Hi,
I have a simple GUI application written with wxWidgetsGTK-2.6.
Well, in practise there's one secondary thread that periodically updates
a text control object:
in terms of gtk api, it calls a gtk_text_buffer_insert, which, of
course, doesn't request for an immediate repaint of the screen,
but p
Mohamed Shafi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This question is more appropriate for the gcc-help mailing list than
for the gcc mailing list.
> For targets which doesn't have simd hardware support like fr30 , simd stuff
> is emulated?
Yes, if you use __attribute__ ((vector_size (NN))) for a target
Basile STARYNKEVITCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the Wiki, http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/MiddleEnd I am trying to document very
> briefly the passes on Gimple SSA trees
Thanks!
> I cannot yet submit patches to it (file gcc/doc/passes.texi) yet, because my
> copyright assignement form takes some t
For targets which doesn't have simd hardware support like fr30 , simd stuff is
emulated?
Is there some flags/macros in gcc to indicate that?
To indicate what?
I guess to indicate that the vector is emulated. The TYPE_MODE of the
vector type, in that case, is BLKmode or an integer mode.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:32:06PM +0200, Marco Gubernati wrote:
> Well, my program works correctly if compiled, for example, with
> gcc-3.3.5 (on SuSe and Debian) or gcc-3.4.3 (on Ubuntu). If compiled
> with gcc-4.1.0
> (on the latest SuSe 10.1 release) (exactly the same code) the program
> crashe
A relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
A relocated compiler should never search the configured prefix for
programs, libraries or start files. A relocated compiler searching for
files in the configured prefix is troublesome. The configured prefix may
contain a conflicting toolchain, or a
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:44:59PM -0700, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> During regression tests if i want to disable some features like trampolines i
> can give -DNO_TRAMPOLINES
> as an compiler flag.
By default, -DNO_TRAMPOLINES is set in testsuite/lib/gcc.exp if the
DejaGnu target info
With svn r117549 bootstrapped on mipsel-none-linux-gnu:
The test gcc.dg/cpp/_Pragma3.c basically checks whether _Pragma3.c is
not younger than the file mi1c.h in the same directory. The test fails
with excess errors if this is not the case:
.
.
.
Executing on host: /home/build/gcc-build/gcc/
>
> With svn r117549 bootstrapped on mipsel-none-linux-gnu:
Usually people us gcc_update in contrib to update their
sources which fixes this problem by touching the files
which need to be touched.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > Okay for stage1?
>
> Ok, assuming everyone agrees to those versions ;-)
Great, thanks. I haven't heard anyone disagree with those versions, so
unless someone objects before stage1 starts I'll use those.
By the way, here is a more complete patch which
Hello,
We are using GCC 3.3.1 and have a requirement imposed upon us by our
customer to "...establish that the C++ compiler implements dynamic
binding by utilizing static lookup tables..."
This implies the need for documentation on GCC's implementation of
dynamic binding, which is typically ach
> I'd like to know how I should go about building GCC such that I can choose
> between SJLJ and ZCX at compile time, using --rts=sjlj.
$srcdir/configure --enable-languages=ada --disable-libada
make [bootstrap]
make -C gcc gnatlib-sjlj
make install
in the $prefix/lib/gcc/$target/$version directory:
Given all this, I posed this question to the gcc mailing list and
received a reply that directed me to the C++ ABI
(http://codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/), which is more detailed and has the
information I'm looking for. However, I need to confirm, in the case of
an FAA audit, that GCC 3.3.1 implements
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20061013 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20061013/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:24:08PM -0500, Lacefield, Greg (CNS COE) wrote:
> However, I need to confirm, in the case of
> an FAA audit, that GCC 3.3.1 implements dynamic binding in this fashion.
> Can anyone on the steering committee "officially" confirm that GCC uses
> static v-tables as described
Lacefield, Greg (CNS COE) wrote:
We are using GCC 3.3.1 and have a requirement imposed upon us by our
customer to "...establish that the C++ compiler implements dynamic
binding by utilizing static lookup tables..."
The short answer is "yes, GCC uses static lookup tables for dynamic
binding".
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 07:45:52AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hopefully I'll be able to debug gcc nicely after this is built. Two
> > more questions that could save me a lot of time. Do you know where the
> > abstract syntax tree is stored in GCC a
Michael Eager wrote:
Lacefield, Greg (CNS COE) wrote:
Given all this, I posed this question to the gcc mailing list and
received a reply that directed me to the C++ ABI
(http://codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/), which is more detailed and has the
information I'm looking for. However, I need to confir
Bob Rossi wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Basically, I want to use GCC with C,C++. I want to walk a tree that GCC
> creates for the translation units. I would like to know if for these two
> languages if I should use a language dependent tree, the generic tree or
> the gimple tree. In general, I would like to
First thanks for the reply.
I want to know what can be done in the back end of a target to indicate that
SIMD stuff should be emulated all the way.
__attribute__ ((vector_size (NN))) is something that can be done in programs.
Is there any target macros or hooks available for that.
Will the targ
31 matches
Mail list logo
