On Monday 02 October 2006 19:39, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> "Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Jan van Dijk wrote:
> | > On Monday 02 October 2006 12:57, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> | > > On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Jan van Dijk wrote:
[...]
> | > Triggered by 1*(Inf,0) = (In
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Jan van Dijk wrote:
> More serious is the fact that the compiler translates 1*(Inf,Inf) into
> (NaN,NaN). This is plain wrong, but, as Joseph mentioned, the solution
> requires the implementation of mixed-mode MULT_EXPRESSIONS, since apparently
>
> 1*(Inf,Inf) == (Inf
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 11:08, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Jan van Dijk wrote:
> > More serious is the fact that the compiler translates 1*(Inf,Inf) into
> > (NaN,NaN). This is plain wrong, but, as Joseph mentioned, the solution
> > requires the implementation of mixed-mode MULT
Hello.
In Japanese version Windows, package Ada.Directories often raises
Name_Error with DBCS-filename. I was shocked that Get_Next_Entry
reported error when reading dir.
I looked for the reason and found gcc/ada/mingw32.h.
#define GNAT_UNICODE_SUPPORT was commented out.
If GNAT_UNICODE_SUPPORT wa
On Monday 02 October 2006 20:53, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
[...]
>
> | the result of the "same" multiplication considered as complex *
> | complex (vs complex * real) has a different sign for the zero
> | imaginary component.
>
> Thanks for the example. I'm not sure this was anticipated by the C++
>
I have decided to accept employment at ARC International, so effective
11th December 2006, I will step down as an active SH maitainer. I might
still do some GCC patch reviews if time allows, but I expect to submit
only patches to the SH port - if any - as part of multi-platform patches
with the in
Hi,
I'm having difficulty finding any documentation for the gcj internals,
apart from the source, Chapter 12 of the gcj manual, a couple of Linux
Journal articles, and some papers from 1997.
Is there anything else that describes the workings of the gcj
front-end and run-time libraries. I'm parti
On Oct 2, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Brendon Costa wrote:
* Modify the ASM spec used for compiling .s files into .o files so
that it will somehow rename the /tmp/foo1.s.edc files to
/tmp/gah1.o.edc files where /tmp/gah1.o is the name of the output .o
file that comes from the assembler.
* Write a wrapp
David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bugzilla currently shows 64 open bugs with a darwin listed as the
> target; another 5 Altivec bugs. I am concerned about the effect on
> releases from increasing the priority of many of those bugs to P1 if
> Darwin is a primary platform.
Which o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack Howarth) writes:
> Geoff,
> Can you explain why we don't have...
>
> Index: unwind-dw2-fde-darwin.c
> ===
> --- unwind-dw2-fde-darwin.c (revision 117350)
> +++ unwind-dw2-fde-darwin.c (working copy
>
> David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Bugzilla currently shows 64 open bugs with a darwin listed as the
> > target; another 5 Altivec bugs. I am concerned about the effect on
> > releases from increasing the priority of many of those bugs to P1 if
> > Darwin is a primary platf
Mike Stump wrote:
> Hum, on second thought, why not just encode the information you want
> into the .o file. Just put it into a special section, in whatever
> format you like, the linker will combine them, no additional files, .a
> files work, ld -r foo.o bar.o -o new.o works and so on. You can t
Brendon Costa wrote:
> Mike Stump wrote:
>> Hum, on second thought, why not just encode the information you want
>> into the .o file. Just put it into a special section, in whatever
>> format you like, the linker will combine them, no additional files, .a
>> files work, ld -r foo.o bar.o -o new.o
On Oct 3, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Brendon Costa wrote:
I think I could insert my data into the .s file into a particular
section. I am not sure if I should create my own named section
I'd recommend .comment probably. If you want to productize it, add
your own, and put it into your linker script.
So let's say that I have an instruction that the combiner finds.
For instance:
"mac":
(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(plus:SI (mult:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "r"))
I am trying to adjust the current gcc/gcc/testsuite/lib/objc.exp
to allow it to build against the gnu-objc runtime library in the
case of -m64 compiles on Darwin8. Unfortunately, I've hit a brick
wall in terms of catching the instance of '-m64' being passed to
the compiler flags. Normally I do
Thanks for all the help. I have tried a few things now and decided to
try and create a new section called .edoc I tried using .comment on my
machine, however there is already data in .comment on my machine and
it will make parsing the data from the section to find my data a
little more difficult as
>
> I am trying to adjust the current gcc/gcc/testsuite/lib/objc.exp
> to allow it to build against the gnu-objc runtime library in the
> case of -m64 compiles on Darwin8. Unfortunately, I've hit a brick
> wall in terms of catching the instance of '-m64' being passed to
> the compiler flags.
Andrew,
I'll double check but I don't think the testcases which
use -fnext-runtime were failing when I had these changes
hardwired in for -m64. The reason is that the -fgnu-runtime
appears on the cflags and gets overridden when a specific
testcase appends -fnext-runtime because that appears last
Andrew,
I think I have this puzzled out now. The correct patch is...
Index: lib/obj-c++.exp
===
--- lib/obj-c++.exp (revision 117423)
+++ lib/obj-c++.exp (working copy)
@@ -282,8 +282,16 @@ proc obj-c++_target_compile { so
"Erich Plondke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Combine doesn't pick tuples of three to attempt to combine, so it
> would never
> pick mult, plus, and ashift to try together.
Actually, combine does try to put pairs and triplets of instructions
together. It won't do four instructions at onc
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 00:30 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> FAIL: objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1/t001_main.m execution test
If these (being objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1/*) are all failing,
then something is wrong. I bet natural alignment is not set correctly
for 64bit. But these were added so
22 matches
Mail list logo
