powerpc-apple-darwin8.7.0
/usr/local/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8.7.0
Configured with: ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.1
Languages: default (c, c++, java, obj-c)
Duncan Sands wrote:
I am writing a new GCC front end. One of the features provided by my
language (CIL) is explicit field layout and size for records.
I don't know if any other languaje supported by GCC provides this
feature. If that's the case, please point me to it so that I can see
Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:58:26PM +0200, Ricardo FERNANDEZ PASCUAL wrote:
I am writing a new GCC front end. One of the features provided by my
language (CIL) is explicit field layout and size for records.
Any p
Hai everyone,
I am trying to port GCC 4.1.1 for my target.
My target doesn't support float variables.
It does'nt have the hardware to support or recongnize float formats.
With this in mind do i need to add Floating point emulation support in t-target
file by
providing
# We want fine grained li
On 25 September 2006 12:29, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
> I am trying to port GCC 4.1.1 for my target.
> My target doesn't support float variables.
> It does'nt have the hardware to support or recongnize float formats.
> With this in mind do i need to add Floating point emulation support in
> t-target
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > The documention on VECTOR_CST is not clear if we can have missing
> > elements in that the remaining elements are zero. Right we produce such
> > VECTOR_CST for things like:
> > #define vector __attribute__((vector_size(16) ))
>
Hi,
I'm trying to understand PR 13615, where a used-uninitialized Fortran
character string induces the following diagnostic:
'c[1]{lb: 1 sz: 1}t.f: In function 'warn_character':
t.f:33: warning: ' is used uninitialized in this function
I see that this error message is emitted from tree-ssa.c, b
François-Xavier Coudert wrote on 09/25/06 08:35:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to understand PR 13615, where a used-uninitialized Fortran
> character string induces the following diagnostic:
>
> 'c[1]{lb: 1 sz: 1}t.f: In function 'warn_character':
> t.f:33: warning: ' is used uninitialized in this functio
> Jan --
>
> I'm trying to plan for GCC 4.3 Stage 1. The IPA branch project is
> clearly a good thing, and you've been working on it for a long time, so
> I'd really like to get it into GCC 4.3. However, I'm a little
> concerned, in reading the project description, that it's not all that
> f
I'd say the FE is not setting the name properly into whatever _DECL we
found.
unit size
align 8 symtab 0 alias set 4 precision 8 min max
pointer_to_this >
used unsigned QI file pr13615.f line 7 size unit size
align 8 context >
I'll try to understand why this $1
From: Mohamed Shafi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: t-target file GCC 4.1.1 port
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
> Hai everyone,
>
> I am trying to port GCC 4.1.1 for my target.
> My target doesn't support float variables.
> It does'nt have the hardware to support or recongnize float fo
Can anyone set me strait on why, in the following code fragment
int x(unsigned);
struct alt_x {
unsigned val;
};
#define xalt_x
#define alt_x(p) x(p+1)
int test(struct x *p) {
return x(p->val);
}
the function invoked in test() is alt_x (rather than x)? I would have
expe
One explanation could be:
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:23 AM
Subject: preprocessing question
Can anyone set me strait on why, in the following code fragment
int x(unsigned);
struct alt_x {
unsigned val;
};
#d
"Michael Gong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One explanation could be:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:23 AM
> Subject: preprocessing question
>
>
>> Can anyone set me strait on why, in the following code frag
The output with cpp 4.0.3:
int test(struct alt_x *p) {
return alt_x(p->val+1);
}
It seems that:
1) "x" expands to alt_x
2) "alt_x(p->val)" expands to "x(p->val+1)"
3) "x" expands (again!) to alt_x
or maybe something else?
Yes. You are right.
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Schwab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Gong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: preprocessing question
"Michael Gong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 05:23:34PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Can anyone set me strait on why, in the following code fragment
>
> int x(unsigned);
>
> struct alt_x {
> unsigned val;
> };
>
> #define xalt_x
> #define alt_x(p) x(p+1)
>
> int test(struct x *p) {
> return x(p->
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 05:23:34PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Can anyone set me strait on why, in the following code fragment
>>
>> int x(unsigned);
>>
>> struct alt_x {
>> unsigned val;
>> };
>>
>> #define xalt_x
>> #define alt_x(p
> "ChJ" == Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ChJ> again, on cygwin/winxp, I get an error
ChJ> ../../../../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm/mprec.c:104:
ChJ> error: static declaration of 'calloc' follows non-static declaration
ChJ> am I doing something seriously wrong here
Hello,
in accordance with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-09/msg00454.html, I am
looking for reviewers for my 4.3 projects. I would like to get someone
"responsible" for reviewing each project soon, so that I may discuss the
changes he considers necessary with him. For each project, the list of
t
On Sep 25, 2006, at 1:04 AM, Ricardo FERNANDEZ PASCUAL wrote:
Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
Are you sure you want to do that, instead of using, say, rpcgen?
I am sorry, but I fail to see the relation of this with rpcgen
(which as far I know is a code generator for the RPC protocol). Am I
looking
Zdenek Dvorak wrote on 09/25/06 14:33:
> autoparallelization (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AutomaticParallelization):
> In addition the the autoparallelization pass (1.5kloc), minor changes
> to gomp framework. 2kloc diff in total.
>
I can help you with this one.
> prefetching improvements (http
On 9/25/06, Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
in accordance with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-09/msg00454.html, I am
looking for reviewers for my 4.3 projects. I would like to get someone
"responsible" for reviewing each project soon, so that I may discuss the
changes he conside
23 matches
Mail list logo
