gcc-4.2.0-20060909 compiles jikes-1.22! very thanks!

2006-09-10 Thread Anny Blackyew
The snapshot gcc-4.2.0-20060909 compiles jikes-1.22. It's OK. Thanks Andrew Pinski Obtenga su E-mail GRATUITO en http://www.clanomega.com ___ Get your own Web-based E-mail Service at http://www.zzn.com

Re: libgfortran build broken on Darwin ppc

2006-09-10 Thread Jack Howarth
Eric, You definitely want the autoconf patch added in otherwise builds of libgfortran will crash when older cctools are used (like Xcode 2.3). I'll try a build of current gcc trunk with your new darwin.c correction but without the autoconf patch to see if all the literal16 support exists in Xco

Re: Branch st/cli opened to host development of CLI back-end

2006-09-10 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Hi Roberto, On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Roberto COSTA wrote: > following previous discussions in this mailing list and the approval > from RMS and the steering committee about a CLI port of gcc, I've opened > a development branch to host its development. The branch is st/cli. would you mind adding a de

Re: Linker scripts

2006-09-10 Thread Segher Boessenkool
GCC passes a linker script to the linker for some targets (e.g., powerpc-eabi with -mads). If you specify a linker script using -Wl,-T,script.ld, you get both passed to the linker and there may be conflicts. Is there any option to GCC which says to not pass the predefined linker script to the li

-ftree-vectorize can't vectorize plus?

2006-09-10 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
A silly little testcase which the vectorizer doesn't vectorize: unsigned char qa[128]; unsigned char qb[128]; unsigned char qc[128]; unsigned char qd[128]; void autovectqi (void) { int i; for (i = 0; i < 128; i ++) qd[i] = qa[i] ^ qb[i] + qc[i]; } Revision

Re: Linker scripts

2006-09-10 Thread Michael Eager
Segher Boessenkool wrote: GCC passes a linker script to the linker for some targets (e.g., powerpc-eabi with -mads). If you specify a linker script using -Wl,-T,script.ld, you get both passed to the linker and there may be conflicts. Is there any option to GCC which says to not pass the predefi

Re: Linker scripts

2006-09-10 Thread Segher Boessenkool
If you use your own linker scripts, you really shouldn't use gcc to do the linking step; call ld directly, instead. gcc has no idea what your linker script does, so it might well call ld with the wrong options... There are a number of targets which pass linker scripts to ld, along with whatever

Re: Linker scripts

2006-09-10 Thread Michael Eager
Segher Boessenkool wrote: If you use your own linker scripts, you really shouldn't use gcc to do the linking step; call ld directly, instead. gcc has no idea what your linker script does, so it might well call ld with the wrong options... There are a number of targets which pass linker scripts

Re: 4.1 status?

2006-09-10 Thread Matthias Klose
Richard Guenther writes: > On 9/9/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kenny Simpson wrote: > > > What is the status of the 4.1 branch? Any word on 4.1.2? > > > > My current plan is to do a 4.1.2 along with 4.2.0. My concern has been > > that with 4.2.0 moving slowly, trying to organi

Re: Linker scripts

2006-09-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:16:29PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >GCC passes a linker script to the linker for some > >targets (e.g., powerpc-eabi with -mads). If you specify a > >linker script using -Wl,-T,script.ld, you get both > >passed to the linker and there may be conflicts. > > > >Is

Re: Linker scripts

2006-09-10 Thread Segher Boessenkool
A linker script passed to the gcc driver should override the one which the driver would pass by default. Yes, and if current GCC has some problems with that, those bugs should be fixed. Sorry if I gave the impression that this would be "user error". The linker script which is specified mus

gcc algol 60 milestone 1

2006-09-10 Thread Petr Machata
Hi list! For those interested, GCC Algol 60 project, the byproduct of GCC Frontend Howto diploma thesis, still lives, and its first milestone is available: http://projects.almad.net/gcc-algol/wiki/Milestones Thanks, PM

Re: libgfortran build broken on Darwin ppc

2006-09-10 Thread Geoffrey Keating
On 10/09/2006, at 6:48 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Eric, You definitely want the autoconf patch added in otherwise builds of libgfortran will crash when older cctools are used (like Xcode 2.3). Typically what we do is just say that GCC requires a later version of cctools. smime.p7s Descr