Hi Tom,
your patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q3/msg00264.html
broke bootstrap (at least on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu):
ranlib .libs/libgij.a
creating libgij.la
./.libs/libgcj.so: undefined reference to `JvNumMethods(java::lang::Class*)'
./.libs/libgcj.so: undefined reference to `JvGe
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
The constraints are not met because the constraint "d" is register class
DX_REGS consisting of register 4 and 5, and (reg:HI 5 dh) spans register 5
and 6. Also, HARD_REGNO_NREGS (5, HImode) returns 0.
The lreg and greg dumps provide the clue that reload got the mo
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:30:34AM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> The constraints are not met because the constraint "d" is register class
> DX_REGS consisting of register 4 and 5, and (reg:HI 5 dh) spans register 5
> and 6. Also, HARD_REGNO_NREGS (5, HImode) returns 0.
I meant to say t
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
> Probably the compiler doesn't in general like a paradoxical subreg that
> can take more hard regs than its SUBREG_REG. I think this is probably
> something that can be worked around with a proper combination of
> MODES_TIEABLE_
Hi
Is there a specification that describes a set of routines for
libgcc-math? I read through previous emails on this topic and it seems
that it has been removed from head. I'd like to contribute but not
sure what direction to go in. Is there a specific branch that needs
checking out?
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:55:49PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> In general, operand_mode[] will be unreliable in cases where it is not
> specified. This is frowned upon but more or less permitted, and a few
> backends take advantage of it for relatively nefarious purposes.
I only have mode
i found in amd asm64-handout that gcc supports __int128_t and __uint128_t for
128-bit integers.
i test it's true.
but how to print an __int128_t integer? use printf, or any other methods.
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/how-to-print-an-__int128_t-integer--tf2051654
On 04 August 2006 15:57, bacmoz wrote:
> i found in amd asm64-handout that gcc supports __int128_t and __uint128_t
> for 128-bit integers.
> i test it's true.
> but how to print an __int128_t integer? use printf, or any other methods.
Please *READ* the group descriptions if you're going to use
Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> > The constraints are not met because the constraint "d" is register class
> > DX_REGS consisting of register 4 and 5, and (reg:HI 5 dh) spans register 5
> > and 6. Also, HARD_REGNO_NREGS (5, HImode) returns 0.
> > The l
If one asks Geoff's regression tester what it thinks of the day to
day quality of gcc, one gets:
256 build native
65 regress-8 native
64 regress-6 native
55 regress-5 native
48 regress-9 native
42 regress-4 native
41 regress-7 native
39 regress-3 native
33 regress-11 native
30
>
> If one asks Geoff's regression tester what it thinks of the day to
> day quality of gcc, one gets:
This is only of C, C++, Objc, and Java. This does include Objective-C++
or Fortran which would be more interesting anyways. Also we would be
back down to 0 regressions (except for a timeout
> The GCC SC has appointed you an "RTL maintainer". Congratulations!
A bit unexpected but thanks anyway. :-)
> That means that you have maintainership of all machine-independent RTL
> optimization passes, like jump, CSE, GCSE, flow, sched2,
> shorten_branches, etc. This post doesn't cover back
Hello,
I have a feature request for mudflap. It should have an option to run
glibc's _libc_freeres function that forces the C runtime library to free all
of its memory and does not leave that task to the underlying OS. When
instrumented with mudflap, the following program reports upon exit ten
"Vesselin Peev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...] I have a feature request for mudflap. It should have an
> option to run glibc's _libc_freeres function that forces the C
> runtime library to free all of its memory [...]
Good idea. (It should not take more than a dozen lines of code - a
thre
Fredrik Johansson wrote:
Why I ask is because I need to extract the number of lines even in
untested files, and I need it to work both on 3.3.6 and on various
3.4.x versions.
This use case had not occurred to me.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell:: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeS
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20060804 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20060804/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm running into problems building libstdc++
> for powerpc-eabi. It eventually fails with an
> error message saying "Link tests are not allowed
> after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES" while it is checking
> to see if libgcc_s exists.
>
> Meanwhile, config.log for
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 10:57 +0200, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> your patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q3/msg00264.html
> broke bootstrap (at least on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu):
>
> ranlib .libs/libgij.a
> creating libgij.la
> ./.libs/libgcj.so: undefined reference to `JvNumMethods(ja
In cp/cvt.c we have this code in cp_convert_to_pointer:
if (INTEGRAL_CODE_P (form))
{
if (TYPE_PRECISION (intype) == POINTER_SIZE)
return build1 (CONVERT_EXPR, type, expr);
expr = cp_convert (c_common_type_for_size (POINTER_SIZE, 0), expr);
/* Modes may be differen
it will be so nice of you if you inform me :
What are the header files & functions used by
gcc ?Is it same as borland turbo header files ?
regards,
supradip dey
__
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something
On Aug 4, 2006, at 6:31 PM, supradip dey wrote:
What are the header files & functions used by gcc?
There are many, please see the source.
Is it same as borland turbo header files ?
No.
> "Volker" == Volker Reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Volker> your patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q3/msg00264.html
Volker> broke bootstrap (at least on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu):
I'm very sorry about this. I know it must not seem like it, but I
really did build with this p
> So... who is right? Are we supposed to support multiple pointer sizes
> in the same compilation unit, or not?
Who's "we"? The middle-end and relevant back-ends support it, but clearly
not all the front ends. C and Ada does but your experiment seems to show
that C++ does not.
23 matches
Mail list logo
