Hi All,
I am in great difficult compiling GCC source code in AIX box.
I installed the binary of GCC 3.3.2 and using this compiler I started
to compile the GCC 3.4.6 source codes.
After 5 hrs of compiling I received the following error.
46286 Segmentation fault:
Configure-target-libstdc++-v3
M
Hi,
(This email is quite long; if you are not interested in performance
data, scroll down for my questions that you might be able to answer)
Below are some performance results with --with-gc=boehm. This
collector since the last posted results at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-06/msg00729.html, h
On Jul 24, 2006, at 1:45 AM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
4) I have configured Linux compilers with "--disable-checking". I was
quite surprised to see that GGC times have disappeared from the "-Q
-ftime-report -fmem-report" output. Is this expected by design
behaviour? What minimum configure option
> 4) I have configured Linux compilers with "--disable-checking". I was
> quite surprised to see that GGC times have disappeared from the "-Q
> -ftime-report -fmem-report" output. Is this expected by design
> behaviour? What minimum configure options will cause GGC time to
> reappear?
Yes that is
On Jul 24, 2006, at 4:22 AM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
So does that mean that there is no way to get GGC debug output with
--disable-checking? Is there any very cheap --enable-checking option
that would be give that or am I better off to hack GCC to do it with
--disable-checking?
No, GC is ju
2006/7/24, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
No, GC is just not running as you have too much memory to cause it to
run with --disable-checking :).
Oh! Now my performance results have totally different interpretation
under Linux...
--
Laurynas
On 22 Jul 2006 20:58:16 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, patch is approved, with a ChangeLog entry, and assuming it passes
> the testsuite.
Thanks, here is a patch with a ChangeLog entry.
I can cross-build gcc and glibc successfully, but unfortunately I can
not build and r
> Kithsiri Lekamge writes:
Kithsiri> I am in great difficult compiling GCC source code in AIX box.
Kithsiri> I installed the binary of GCC 3.3.2 and using this compiler I started
Kithsiri> to compile the GCC 3.4.6 source codes.
Kithsiri> After 5 hrs of compiling I received the following err
Atsushi Nemoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Index: gcc/config/mips/mips.md
> ===
> --- gcc/config/mips/mips.md (revision 115370)
> +++ gcc/config/mips/mips.md (working copy)
> @@ -5450,6 +5450,9 @@
> ; MIPS 32r2 specification, b
Hi,
I'm trying to build a cross-development system and I'm 99% successful.
My host is a standard Linux PC, target is a PDA (arm-wince-pe).
Versions of all tools are below.
I can build a cross-gcc as long as I tell it to support only C. When
trying to get C++ compiled as well, I always end up get
Thanks for tackling this.
Atsushi Nemoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 22 Jul 2006 20:58:16 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, patch is approved, with a ChangeLog entry, and assuming it passes
>> the testsuite.
>
> Thanks, here is a patch with a ChangeLog entry.
>
> I can
On 24 July 2006 18:31, Danny Backx wrote:
> I can build a cross-gcc as long as I tell it to support only C. When
> trying to get C++ compiled as well, I always end up getting the error
> message below.
>
> I've tried patching gas because I had the feeling that gcc is producing
> an option that g
Hello,
this patch adds documentation for loop analysis and representation of
loops, as well as other loop-related analyses, and for functions to
manipulate loops. As I am not a native English speaker, there are
probably many language errors in the document, so I would appreciate
if someone could
I've run ./xgcc -dumpspecs but I don't know what to look at. That one
doesn't contain the string "Qy". However, when I do the same with my
native gcc (the one I got from Mandriva), it does contain that :
*asm:
%{v:-V} %{Qy:} %{!Qn:-Qy} %{n} %{T} %{Ym,*} %{Yd,*} %{Wa,*:%*}
You might have noted tha
Dave,
I'd used some search engines for the -Qy error but never really found
the solution. Your reply prompted me to do that yet again, and I found
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/1997-06/msg00457.html
which basically says
configure creates a softlink in gcc object directory to the new
versio
I am trying to build a table with offsets of global pointers from a
given pointer:
void *fs[] = {f1 - f1, f2 - f1};
where f1 and f2 are functions.
GCC is able to figure out that (f1 - f1) is 0, but says "initializer
element is not constant" when trying to compute (f2 - f1).
It is possible to s
gcc generates two separate trees for compound literals in c and c++.
As in this test case:
struct S {
int i,j;
};
void foo (struct S);
int main ()
{
foo((struct S){1,1});
}
In c it generates compound_literal_expr and in c++ it generates
target_expr. But gimplifier treats
>
>
> gcc generates two separate trees for compound literals in c and c++.
> As in this test case:
>
> struct S {
> int i,j;
> };
> void foo (struct S);
>
> int main ()
> {
> foo((struct S){1,1});
> }
> On the other hand, such a guard does not exist for a
> compound_
On Jul 24, 2006, at 3:07 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
gcc generates two separate trees for compound literals in c and c++.
As in this test case:
struct S {
int i,j;
};
void foo (struct S);
int main ()
{
foo((struct S){1,1});
}
On the other hand, such a guard does not e
On Jul 24, 2006, at 3:07 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
gcc generates two separate trees for compound literals in c and c++.
As in this test case:
struct S {
int i,j;
};
void foo (struct S);
int main ()
{
foo((struct S){1,1});
}
On the other hand, such a guard does not e
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 3:57 PM
To: Andrew Pinski
Cc: Mark Mitchell; Carlos O'Donell; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jul 23, 20
"Rafael Espíndola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am trying to build a table with offsets of global pointers from a
| given pointer:
|
| void *fs[] = {f1 - f1, f2 - f1};
|
| where f1 and f2 are functions.
|
| GCC is able to figure out that (f1 - f1) is 0, but says "initializer
| element is not
Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this patch adds documentation for loop analysis and representation of
> loops, as well as other loop-related analyses, and for functions to
> manipulate loops. As I am not a native English speaker, there are
> probably many language errors in the document, so I w
hi all, i help installing gcc 4.0.3
Dave,
After removing the gcc/as file as I wrote yesterday, the build does work
and it is possible to cross-compile a working hello-world app.
Danny
Forwarded Message
> From: Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: CeGCC Development List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: C++
25 matches
Mail list logo
