On May 14, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
The other languages don't do that.
ObjC/ObjC++ kinda do :-( I have a dream, one day...
> @item -fsee
> @opindex fsee
> Eliminates redundant extension instructions and move the non redundant
> ones to optimal placement using LCM.
> Enabled at level @option{-O3}.
>
> Would you mind adjusting this as well
Thanks. I've updated doc/invoke.texi correspondingly. Mircea
LS,
The link crossgcc FAQ in the middle of the page:
"http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html"; doesn't seem to link to a page that
offers the cross-gcc faq. Instead it appears to be a site of a consultant
trying to sell his services.
Kind regards,
Ernst.
Ernst Steenbrink
Imtech ICT Technical
> What do people who build in a combined tree do with intl? Do they use
> the GCC version or the src tree version? Is there any consensus about
> whether or not there should be a single version of intl, and if so,
> which one should be used?
FWIW, I have always given preference to the gcc versio
Hello,
when cse replaces registers in an insn it tries to avoid calls to
validate_change, what causes trouble in some situations.
>From validate_canon_reg:
/* If replacing pseudo with hard reg or vice versa, ensure the
insn remains valid. Likewise if the insn has MATCH_DUPs. */
if (ins
Consider the following code that starting with GCC 4.1.0 generates
'dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules'
warning:
~> cat test.c
struct inner {
struct inner *next;
};
struct outer {
struct inner base;
int value;
};
/* List of outer elements where all oute
Steven Bosscher wrote:
So now we have a half-completed conversion to USE_MAPPED_LOCATION which is
currently broken (doesn't bootstrap for me with --enable-mapped-locations).
Oops. Looks like I made and posted a patch, but never checked it in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00882.
Robert Dewar wrote:
Can someone point me to a clear high level spec for the proposed
interface for MAPPED_LOCATION support.
I don't know of any high-level spec, except libcpp/include/line-map.h.
A "line_map" (singular) specifies how a sub-range of source_location
integer cookies are to be inte
Union-Souths-Computer:~/developer UnionSouth$ ../gcc-5250/configure
creating cache ./config.cache
checking host system type... powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0
checking target system type... powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0
checking build system type... powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0
checking for a BSD compatible in
>
>
> Union-Souths-Computer:~/developer UnionSouth$ ../gcc-5250/configure
> creating cache ./config.cache
> checking host system type... powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0
> checking target system type... powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0
> checking build system type... powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0
> checking for a
On May 15, 2006, at 8:56 AM, Igor Bukanov wrote:
Consider the following code that starting with GCC 4.1.0 generates
'dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules'
warning:
Yup. Kinda does seem a flaw in the C language. You could switch to C
++. :-)
~> cat test.c
str
> I'll pre-approve that change, but I'll also defer to any other
> maintainer who has a solution they prefer.
How about this one?
2006-05-15 DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* crtstuff.c (__dso_handle): Set section from
TARGET_LBIGCC_SDATA_SECTION if defined.
* doc/tm.te
There are now 98 serious regressions open against GCC 4.1, including 9
P1s. However, none of these are -- as far as I can tell -- regressions
from 4.1.0; they are all regressions from previous releases. Given that
we've fixed 114 bugs since 4.1.0, I think it's time to create a 4.1.1
release.
The
DJ Delorie wrote:
>> I'll pre-approve that change, but I'll also defer to any other
>> maintainer who has a solution they prefer.
>
> How about this one?
OK.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
Mark,
> Therefore, effective midnight tonight (i.e., 12:00AM May 17th in
> California), the 4.1 branch will be frozen. (I previously announced May
> 15th as a target release date.) After that point, all changes,
> including previously approved patches, need my explicit approval. I'll
> create 4
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Mark,
>
>> Therefore, effective midnight tonight (i.e., 12:00AM May 17th in
>> California), the 4.1 branch will be frozen. (I previously announced May
>> 15th as a target release date.) After that point, all changes,
>> including previously approved patches, need my explic
Hi,
I was not able to find who is maintaining the GCC Wiki at
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HomePage
I have found one strange problem and I would like to discuss it in private.
Thanks,
Manuel.
PS: I have noticed that Andrew Pinski is notified of page changes. On
the other hand, many changes have bee
On May 15, 2006, at 4:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was not able to find who is maintaining the GCC Wiki at
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HomePage
I have found one strange problem and I would like to discuss it in
private.
Private, what's that?! :-) If you want, I'll entertain a discussion.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was not able to find who is maintaining the GCC Wiki at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HomePage
> I have found one strange problem and I would like to discuss it in private.
There are plenty of known problems, security related and otherwise.
I am the maintainer, f
hi,
Anybody knows that if we can define a comment? For a statement such as,
COMMENT this is a comment.
will be preprocessed as,
// this is a comment.
or something valid and transparent to the compiler? Of cause we can't
directly use,
#define COMMENT //
Thanks.
Eric.
On May 15, 2006, at 7:08 PM, Eric Fisher wrote:
Anybody knows that if we can define a comment?
Wrong list. comp.lang.c or gcc-help is more appropriate.
Short answer, no, not really. Longer answer:
#define COMMENT(X)
> > How about this one?
>
> OK.
Thanks; committed.
Where's the simplest part of the source tree to learn from? GCC? Does
that directory contain the compiler simple? I've pulled some inodes
containing an old c compiler from a unix v7 but it's old k&r C. I want to
see a multiple pass C compiler in ansi.
Bill
This list isn't for these type of questions.
On May 15, 2006, at 9:31 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote:
Where's the simplest part of the source tree to learn from? GCC? Does
that directory contain the compiler simple?
No, gcc isn't simple, though, what you can learn from it is more
valuable, if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DJ Delorie wrote:
> 2006-05-15 DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * crtstuff.c (__dso_handle): Set section from
> TARGET_LBIGCC_SDATA_SECTION if defined.
> * doc/tm.text (TARGET_LIBGCC_SDATA_SECTION): Document.
> * config/mip
On Tue, 2006-05-16 03:49:57 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: dj
> Date: Tue May 16 03:49:57 2006
> New Revision: 113817
>
> * doc/tm.text (TARGET_LIBGCC_SDATA_SECTION): Document.
>
> Modified:
> trunk/gcc/doc/tm.texi
if [ xinfo = xinfo ]; then \
26 matches
Mail list logo
