It seems fine to me. One note for copying collection; I don't know
that you need to solve the local variables problem. What I did during
development was support both copying and non-copying collection;
there's at least one suitable point (probably more - I did not look
very hard) for copying.
Hi Bill,
You need to have a previous version of GCC with Ada enabled
to be able to compile Ada since the Ada front-end is written in Ada.
It is likely that your configure log has a failure for the following
checks:
checking for gnatbind... gnatbind
checking whether compiler driver understands A
On 06 May 2006 19:45, sean yang wrote:
>> From: Andrew Pinski
>> On May 6, 2006, at 10:06 AM, sean yang wrote:
>>
>>> 2) indirect call (explained in 3.1 in the above paper)
>>> Can someone help me explain this a bit? --what the corresponding code is
>>> in C, and what causes it to happen? What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeCleanups
Please add new items to the task list as you see fit. There may be some
crossover with other projects, particularly some from 'speedup areas'.
In these cases it may be simpler to just add links.
-BEGIN PG
Joseph S. Myers wrote:-
> On Sun, 7 May 2006, Neil Booth wrote:
>
> > For the composite type, 6.2.7p3 dash 1 applies, and the composite is
> > the VLA type. That VLA type is derived indirectly from an incomplete
> > type, and hence subscripting that incomplete type falls foul of the
> > contrain
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 10:06, Steven Newbury wrote:
> I have built an EABI/iWMMXt Gentoo based system. The toolchain I used is
> modified to add a Linux/EABI/iWMMXt target. It has been fine until I changed
> my binutils from an earlier snapshot to a current version Gentoo 2.16.92,
> csl-2_17-branc
--- Richard Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 10:06, Steven Newbury wrote:
> > I have built an EABI/iWMMXt Gentoo based system. The toolchain I used is
> > modified to add a Linux/EABI/iWMMXt target. It has been fine until I
> changed
> > my binutils from an earlier sn
On May 7, 2006, at 5:06 PM, fsshl plinlin wrote:
dear gcc:
when I try to install gcc 4.0 at my apple mac os X , 7.9.0 (by uname
-r),
when I ./configure
it reply error as no acceptable cc found in $PATH
if that need c compiler be install, please tell where, (if binary ,
please indicate th
On 07 May 2006 02:48, Dan Kegel wrote:
>On 05 May 2006 11:50, Ginil Gharat wrote:
>>
>> We recently started porting a C++ project from gcc-3.2.1 to gcc-4.0.1. We
>> initially ran into several problems. The code that compiled easily with
>> gcc-3.2.1 would not compile with gcc-4.0.1.
>>
>> Later w
On 07 May 2006 21:36, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:26:20PM +0200, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
>> - Cygwin's mmap() is still buggy. There was a lot of work on it
>> previously, the last message I could find on the subject was
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg005
Is there a recent (3.4.2 or later) patch for the following problem?
Consider the short program fragment below. There are two failures, and
one success under gcc.
The entire fragment compiles ok with the latest Microsoft Visual Studio
and even one version before that.
With gcc 3.4.1 (Cygwin) and
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:30:57AM -0700, Earl Chew wrote:
> Is there a recent (3.4.2 or later) patch for the following problem?
It's not clear whether there is any problem in the compiler, though there
may be a problem in the code.
> The entire fragment compiles ok with the latest Microsoft Visu
I tried that RPM for gnat 3.15 and it wants binutils 2.9 and well I
built a binary version of binutils 2.16 with a 3.4.6 compiler. So RPM
doesn't know binutils is installed. So what I need to do is force RPM to
install this .rpm by overriding it's checking for dependancies. Would anyone
happen
Earl Chew wrote:
> Is there a recent (3.4.2 or later) patch for the following problem?
>
> Consider the short program fragment below. There are two failures, and
> one success under gcc.
>
> The entire fragment compiles ok with the latest Microsoft Visual Studio
> and even one version before th
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 14:49 -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I tried that RPM for gnat 3.15 and it wants binutils 2.9 and well I
> built a binary version of binutils 2.16 with a 3.4.6 compiler. So RPM
> doesn't know binutils is installed. So what I need to do is force RPM to
> install this .rpm
On May 6, 2006, at 3:32 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Function prototype scope is defined in 6.2.1#4.
I've fixed up most all the previously identified issues...
In gnu99:
void foo11(typeof (int (*)(int o[*])) i);
valid?
On Mon, 8 May 2006, Mike Stump wrote:
> On May 6, 2006, at 3:32 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Function prototype scope is defined in 6.2.1#4.
>
> I've fixed up most all the previously identified issues...
>
> In gnu99:
>
> void foo11(typeof (int (*)(int o[*])) i);
>
> valid?
I think that's v
For mips-elf builds, crtbegin.o is built with -G 0 ("in case $gp isn't
used"). This makes __dso_handle be put in .data. However, the
"prototype" created by cp/decl.c is "void *__dso_data" which causes
GPrel addressing if your application is built without -G 0 (i.e. the
default), which causes lin
The following presentations from the Gelato ICE GCC track (April 24
and 25) can be found at:
http://www.gelato.org/community/gelato_meeting.php?id=ICE06aprT
(see bottom of left index column entitled "Focus on GCC" for links)
- The ISP RAS Effort to Improve GCC for Itanium, Arutyun Avetisyan
- GCC
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For mips-elf builds, crtbegin.o is built with -G 0 ("in case $gp isn't
> used"). This makes __dso_handle be put in .data. However, the
> "prototype" created by cp/decl.c is "void *__dso_data" which causes
> GPrel addressing if your application is built wi
20 matches
Mail list logo
