Hi Daniel,
I have already reported this bug. The bug number is #27363.
I also tried the gcc snapshot 4.1.1-20060421. The bug is not
fixed in this version too.
Thanks & Regards
yfw
On 5/1/06, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:03:05AM +0800, Fengwei Yin wrote
On Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3)/TI UltraSparc IIi
(Sabre) sun4u, I get two new failures...
splitting
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/c6/c64103b.ada
into:
c64103b.adb
BUILD c64103b.adb
gnatmake --GCC="/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/sr
> Any ideas?
Re-run the testsuite, they most likely will disappear.
--
Eric Botcazou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The x86 box that runs SPEC2000 daily has hardware problems. It will be
looked at sometime this week, but I'm not sure when it will be back online.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEVjI/UTa2oAUaiwQRAlCAAKCcy/Ueea
I would like to know who supports pdp11 for 3.4.6 or even the latest 4.x
version of gcc? Is it still being maintained ? I'm trying to cross compile a
pdp11 on my i686 and I'm having problems. If I can talk to the maintainer(s)
I can get some help and maybe even get involved in pdp11 support.
B
Hello,
As a quick reminder, the problem that I encountered arised when trying
to compile source files that are NOT encoded with the same encoding as
the system header files. My current Linux machine uses UTF-8, but I am
trying to compile files that were created using Windows "unicode".
To ma
I'd like to extend the FPSCR support functions in SH's libgcc.a to
include a way for applications to change the bits that GCC doesn't
care about (exception handling, denormals, etc). I've come up with
this routine and (after much head-banging) managed to test it on real
hardware. The idea is tha
I have a hex file that i want to read and then write to another file and
preserve the hex info.
What is the best approach?
thanks,
**
David DeSimone
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Advanced Nuclear Technology N-2
Mail stop: B228
Los Alamos, NM 87545
phone: (50
On Mon, 2006-05-01 14:43:06 -0400, Bill Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to know who supports pdp11 for 3.4.6 or even the latest 4.x
> version of gcc? Is it still being maintained ? I'm trying to cross compile a
> pdp11 on my i686 and I'm having problems. If I can talk to th
On Apr 29, 2006, at 7:45 AM, Manfred von Willich wrote:
Any interested GCC maintainers/contributors:
I'd encourage you to work up a solid proposal for ISO/ANSI and
propose it there. Some of the issues you bring up have already been
discussed in that forum and decided, I'd doubt that they'd
On May 1, 2006, at 1:26 PM, David Desimone wrote:
I have a hex file that i want to read and then write to another
file and preserve the hex info.
Wrong list.
> gcc:version 4.02
> target: DLX CPU (port in progress)
>
> Does anyone have an idea what can cause this?
> Is this a bug in gcc or in target cpu files?
It's almost certainly a bug in your target files. The quickest course
of action would be to run cc1 under gdb, feed it with the same sourc
svn is giving me grief, I'm merging and getting:
mrs $ svn cp -r113703 svn+ssh://src.apple.com/svn/fsf-gcc/gcc/
branches/apple-local-200502-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/
bitreverse-10.C bitreverse-10.C
svn: Entry for 'bitreverse-10.C' exists (though the working file is
missing)
mrs $ svn add
> mrs $ svn cp -r113703 svn+ssh://src.apple.com/svn/fsf-gcc/gcc/
> branches/apple-local-200502-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/
> bitreverse-10.C bitreverse-10.C
> svn: Entry for 'bitreverse-10.C' exists (though the working file is
> missing)
>
> How do I `fix' this. I know how to fix it with multiple
On May 1, 2006, at 7:43 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
What exactly are you trying to achieve?
The first order operation is is a new fangled concept called a
merge. The second order operation is to dig out from under svn bugs
with additional commands to get the state of the working copy
correct,
> It amazes me that svn can't do a merge.
That's patently inaccurate.
Have you tried using the svnmerge script that uses SVN properties to
remember which changesets you have (and haven't) merged?
Ben
> Well, conceptually, I want the history for the file, hence the cp. I
> was trying to get around yet another svn bug that causes checkins of
> merge products to fail.
What bugs?
If you file them, and tell us how to reproduce them, maybe we could fix
them?
On 5/2/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It amazes me that svn can't do a merge.
Just because you can't do it, doesn't mean svn can't do it. Other
people have been maintaining branches with svn for months now without
trouble.
Gr.
Steven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Stump wrote:
> It amazes me that svn can't do a merge.
>
You obviously have not read the documentation nor browsed the GCC wiki.
Doing merges with svn is amazingly simple.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEV
On 5/1/06, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any ideas?
Re-run the testsuite, they most likely will disappear.
right... I somehow had memory kernel related issues... A new one now... c9a011b
--
Cheers,
/ChJ
20 matches
Mail list logo
