Suggestion for GCC (C & C++) enhancement - static variable initialisation ordering

Any interested GCC maintainers/contributors: I have a suggestion for GCC to eliminate a pernicious problem - that of automatically initialising static (i.e. long-lived) variables in the correct order based on mutual dependencies, apparently not normally addressed by compilers. This is a thorny

- LeGeNdOfHyIp -

new hyip paid me Referral plz join and paid under me :) http://legendofhyip.com/?ref=mazika

The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.1 is released

This is the beta release of binutils 2.17.50.0.1 for Linux, which is based on binutils 2006 0427 in CVS on sources.redhat.com plus various changes. It is purely for Linux. The new x86_64 assembler no longer accepts monitor %eax,%ecx,%edx You should use monitor %rax,%ecx,%edx or

gcc-4.2-20060429 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.2-20060429 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20060429/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: Summer of Code: proposal to participate with Partial Transitions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Kegel wrote: > > You might want to start by picking just one of the "Partial Transitions" > tasks and trying to work on it, even before submitting a proposal; that > will help you write a better proposal... Its a good idea Dan. :) May be I can st

Re: Summer of Code: proposal to participate with Partial Transitions

On 4/29/06, Eder L. Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might want to start by picking just one of the "Partial Transitions" > tasks and trying to work on it, even before submitting a proposal; that > will help you write a better proposal... Its a good idea Dan. :) May be I can start with d

Gcc 4.2 miscompiles binutils on x86 and x86-64

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:49:42PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Apr 29, 2006, "H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 12:14:03AM -0600, R Hill wrote: > >> > >> Testcase is: > >> > >> .tfloat 1.442695040888963407359924681002 > >> > >> Binutils is 2.16.92, config

ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug.

Hi, I am using gcc4.1 for ARM to build Linux kernel. But there is a bug related to the gcc optimization. I assume this is correct mail list to report this bug. If not, please let me know. And I didn't find the same bug reported too. The kernel is 2.6.14. When I build ALSA subsystem. I use followi