On 3/16/06, Geert Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2006, at 05:09, Robert Dewar wrote:
> > Not quite right. If you have an uninitialized variable, the value is
> > invalid and may be out of bounds, but this is a bounded error
> > situation,
> > not an erroneous program. So the possib
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 20:10 -0800, Alexey Starovoytov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The default architecture for GCC SPARC is V7.
> What do gcc sparc developers think about changing it to V8PLUS?
>
> Few things to consider:
> - v7 is legacy
> . used in old Sun's sun4c systems
> . 32-bit only
> .
Hi All
I have a query regarding __GLOBAL_ prefixed symbols.
while compiling the testcase given below produces
a symbol '_GLOBAL__I_main', which according to the defination of
static global initiallization should be a global symbol. But
gcc makes it a local symbols.
can anyone explain the reason
Nikolaos Kavvadias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> how is it possible to emit regular register names (e.g. for the MIPS
> to use $31 and not $ra) when producing assembly output (with
> mips-elf-gcc -S)?
That seems an odd example. gcc already uses $31 rather than $ra.
The only two mnemonic names it
Hi there,
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, 11:35:56 +0100, Inder wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have a query regarding __GLOBAL_ prefixed symbols.
> while compiling the testcase given below produces
> a symbol '_GLOBAL__I_main', which according to the defination of
> static global initiallization should be a global
There is a large installed based of V7/V8 Sparc devices,
and it is in fact growing. This is because of the
adoption of the LEON SPARC V8 processor, which is used
in a growing number of embedded devices. As an example,
the Nemerix NJ1030A GPS receiver contains a LEON SPARC
cpu and was shipped in 1
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:43 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Geert Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 16, 2006, at 05:09, Robert Dewar wrote:
> > > Not quite right. If you have an uninitialized variable, the value is
> > > invalid and may be out of bounds, but this is a bou
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 23:09 -0500, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:31 -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 20:08 +0100, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> >>
> >>> What do you mean by "abuse"? TYPE_MAX_VALUE means maximal value
> >>> allowed by given
On Mar 16, 2006, at 10:43, Richard Guenther wrote:
Uh - what do you expect here?? Does the Ada standard
require a out-of-range exception upon the first use of N?
In this case, the frontend needs to insert a proper check.
You cannot expect the middle-end to avoid the above
transformation, so thi
On 3/16/06, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:43 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On 3/16/06, Geert Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mar 16, 2006, at 05:09, Robert Dewar wrote:
> > > > Not quite right. If you have an uninitialized variable, the va
On 3/16/06, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:43 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > On 3/16/06, Geert Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mar 16, 2006, at 05:09, Robert Dewar wrote:
> >
On 3/16/06, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:43 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On 3/16/06, Geert Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mar 16, 2006, at 05:09, Robert Dewar wrote:
> > > > Not quite right. If you have an uninitialized variable, the va
Hello,
when compiling postgres 8.1.2 with GCC 3.3.2 (obtained as binary package from
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/aix/products/aixos/linux/download.html
) on AIX 5.3, we get:
gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wendif-labels
-fno-strict-aliasing
On 3/16/06, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > procedure T2 is
> >type R is range 1 .. 10;
> >type T is array (R) of Integer;
> >I : R;
> >X : T;
> > begin
> >X (I) := 0;
> > end T2;
> >
> > The Ada FE will ins
On Mar 16, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
The above was for 4.1.0 - with mainline gigi now generates
if (i == 0 || i > 10)
{
__gnat_rcheck_06 ("t2.adb", 7);
}
else
{
}
x[() (t2__TrB) i]{lb: 1 sz: 4} = 0;
huh? That's even more bogus.
It might not be g
> Ok,
> but the default is to use the apcs-gnu instend of aapcs. Is it right? For
> compatibility problem is usefull to forse the abi to the standard.
Depends how you configure your toolchain. If you use the eabi targets the
default will be aapcs/EABI.
Paul
Hi!
I was wondering if openmp is already available in the mainline release of gcc.
According to http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html#wwwdocs
(look under inactive branches) the gomp branch has been merged with the
mainline and gnu.gcc.org reports that an OpenMP v2.5
parallel programming interface implemen
On 03/16/06 09:15, Dierk Bolten wrote:
> I was wondering if openmp is already available in the mainline release of gcc.
>
Yes. Look in GCC's home page for the announcement.
> However, I cannot find any trace of it in the current gcc sources.
>
Use the -fopenmp switch.
Hi folks
Currently gcc creates negative segment offsets within TLS code for
i386/x86_64 with glibc. The docu also stat that this feature is system
dependant.
Now there is a variant of linux on i386/x86_64 which don't allow such
access: xenlinux. Support for this virtualization method is raising.
Jiri Gaisler wrote:
There is a large installed based of V7/V8 Sparc devices,
and it is in fact growing. This is because of the
adoption of the LEON SPARC V8 processor, which is used
in a growing number of embedded devices. As an example,
the Nemerix NJ1030A GPS receiver contains a LEON SPARC
cp
On 3/16/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > The above was for 4.1.0 - with mainline gigi now generates
> >
> > if (i == 0 || i > 10)
> > {
> > __gnat_rcheck_06 ("t2.adb", 7);
> > }
> > else
> > {
> >
> >
your error is because gcc needs in the directory where you compile the header
files so first extract your w32api and runtime in that directory (step 05)
OK I got a lot of problems compile gcc 4.1.0 with mingw/msys
Finally its done
Because it took me a lot of time here the solution
http://prdownlo
> harbecke writes:
harbecke> when compiling postgres 8.1.2 with GCC 3.3.2 (obtained as binary
package from
harbecke> http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/aix/products/aixos/linux/download.html
harbecke> ) on AIX 5.3, we get:
harbecke> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-
David,
>
> This is not a GCC problem. AIX 5.2 and above provide _isnan and
> _isnanf:
>
> $ oslevel
> 5.3.0.0
> $ nm -BCpg /usr/lib/libm.a | grep isnan
> /usr/lib/libm.a[isnan.o]:
> 0 T ._isnan
> /usr/lib/libm.a[_isnanf.o]:
> 0 T ._isnanf
>
> Are you sure that the libm
FYI, today's gcc 4.2 generates many unaligned access on IA64:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26721
It may be related to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01001.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01000.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00999.
H. J. Lu wrote:
FYI, today's gcc 4.2 generates many unaligned access on IA64:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26721
It may be related to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01001.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01000.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20060316 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20060316/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Hi,
So this Mandriva guy tells me gfortran can't compile Scilab, and
he is right! Scilab is a pretty important piece of Fortran that
many people use, so it is a shame that gfortran can't build it
right now. But the reason why it can't is not really a Fortran
problem (at least I haven't found any
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:13:30AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So this Mandriva guy tells me gfortran can't compile Scilab, and
> he is right! Scilab is a pretty important piece of Fortran that
> many people use, so it is a shame that gfortran can't build it
> right now. But the reas
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:13:30AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> I'm looking for suggestions for how to fix this in libgfortran.
> I would fix this in Scilab, except that if gfortran is to be a
> drop-in replacement for g77, then we shouldn't have this kind of
> rather silly compatibilty issues.
On 3/17/06, Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Careful. libgfortran attempts to keep its namespace clean
> by appending gfortran_ to its intrinsics procedure.
I know, I invented that, sort of (/me does the Al Gore "I invented..."
shuffle ;-)
> If
> you really want to expose getarg_ and
> Debian has been running with V8PLUS as the default since the sarge release
> cycles started. I.e. years.
looking at linux64.h it seems that the default Linux config is -m64 -mcpu=v9.
Are you saying that Debian configured gcc package for -m32 -mcpu=v9?
Great.
How about other Linux distributions?
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:49:16AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On 3/17/06, Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If
> > you really want to expose getarg_ and iargc_, look at abort_.
>
> I really do want to somehow make it easy for people to link against
> libgfortran when they are comp
33 matches
Mail list logo
