Re: ACATS c460008 and VRP

Laurent GUERBY wrote: On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 01:34 +0100, Robert Dewar wrote: Laurent GUERBY wrote: VRP might now force us to update the overflow list but I'm not sure about switching to a full -gnato everywhere. well you can expect some fiddling each version if you work this way The list fo

Re: ACATS c460008 and VRP

On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 07:29 -0500, Robert Dewar wrote: > Laurent GUERBY wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 01:34 +0100, Robert Dewar wrote: > >> Laurent GUERBY wrote: > >> > >>> VRP might now force us to update the overflow list but I'm not sure > >>> about switching to a full -gnato everywhere. > >>

Build report for AIX 5.1

Hi, i just built GCC 4.1.0 on AIX 5.1 using the following commands: ../gcc-4.1.0/configure --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr --disable-nls --disable-multilib make bootstrap-lean make install $ config.guess powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0 $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc

gcc-4.2-20060304 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.2-20060304 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20060304/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Darwin long doubles and controlled rounding

Hi there, I have read the files darwin-ldouble* in GCC 4.1.0. What I would like do know is whether I can expect long doubles on Darwin to comply with ISO C99 7.6 (Floating-point environment). I am particularly interested in the possibility of setting the rounding mode with fesetround(). Is this

Why is libstdc++ abi_check failing on gcc 4.1.0 on amd64 platform?

Hello, I'm curious why is GCC 4.1.0 release libstdc++'s abi_check failing for me on linux/amd64 platform? I've submited my testsuite results here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-03/msg00224.html Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd.

does gcc 4.1 generate "faster" binaries than earlier gcc versions?

Perhaps the question is a bit silly, but I thought I'd ask it anyway. I'm compiling some software for a Linux/uClibc on a mipsel platform. Right now I'm using gcc 3.4.4 to do both native and cross-compilation. A while ago gcc 4.1 was released, and boasts many optimizations. As the mipsel devi

Re: does gcc 4.1 generate "faster" binaries than earlier gcc versions?

Hi, of course most development on gcc is applied to make the produced binary faster. Also most benchmarks focus on the speed of the produced binaries - you just need to look on the right benchmarks ,-) Whether the generated binary of gcc in a new major version is faster depends on your code and o

gcc-3_4-branch frozen

Please consider the branch gcc-3_4-branch as frozen for release purpose, and after that forever. -- Gaby

Re: does gcc 4.1 generate "faster" binaries than earlier gcc versions?

Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Perhaps the question is a bit silly, but I thought I'd ask it anyway. I'm compiling some software for a Linux/uClibc on a mipsel platform. Right now I'm using gcc 3.4.4 to do both native and cross-compilation. A while ago gcc 4.1 was released, and boasts many optimiza