Re: C++ parsing regression?

2006-01-04 Thread Richard Guenther
This is now PR c++/25663. Richard.

Slightly OT: Subversion 1.3.0 Now Available

2006-01-04 Thread Ranjit Mathew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, This is slightly off-topic for this list, but I just noticed that Subversion 1.3.0 is now finally available: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/NewsItemView?newsItemID=1417 I wonder if gcc.gnu.org would be moving to this version any time so

Re: Slightly OT: Subversion 1.3.0 Now Available

2006-01-04 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 15:47 +0530, Ranjit Mathew wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > This is slightly off-topic for this list, but I > just noticed that Subversion 1.3.0 is now finally > available: > > http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/NewsItemView?newsItem

Time to add new copyright years...

2006-01-04 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Just to remember you all that before committing a patch, you now have to check if the copyright year includes 2006. CCing people who committed patches so far this year. :-) Paolo

Re: Time to add new copyright years...

2006-01-04 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Just to remember you all that before committing a patch, you now have to check > if the copyright year includes 2006. And this includes the --version copyright year of any program your code forms part of, and the overall copyright notice dates of any ma

Re: Time to add new copyright years...

2006-01-04 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:41:11PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > Just to remember you all that before committing a patch, you now have to > > check > > if the copyright year includes 2006. > > And this includes the --version copyright year of any

RFD: CSiBE failure: typeof sometimes copies toplevel const qualifiers

2006-01-04 Thread Joern RENNECKE
benchmark with an sh-elf targeted compiler: while [ $((I--)) -gt 0 ] ; do \ /usr/bin/time -a -o signal.o.time -f "%U" /mnt/scratch/base-20060104/bin/sh-elf-gcc -c -D__linux__ -D__KERNEL__ -DCONFIG_ARCH_S390X -DCONFIG_ARCH_S390 -U__i386__ -U__x86_64__ -I/mnt/scratch/CSiBE/base-20060104/li

Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap

2006-01-04 Thread Diego Novillo
On Monday 02 January 2006 03:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > make all-stage2 STAGE1_LANGUAGES=c,fortran > So, how would I now get a cc1plus/f951/jc1/cc1 binary compiled by the stage0 (host) compiler? Before, I used to do (inside /gcc): $ make restage1 f951 cc1plus jc1 That would give me the 4 '

Re: RFD: CSiBE failure: typeof sometimes copies toplevel const qualifiers

2006-01-04 Thread Richard Guenther
einstated. However, unmodified mainline (r109325) fails to compile the > linux benchmark with an sh-elf targeted compiler: > while [ $((I--)) -gt 0 ] ; do \ > /usr/bin/time -a -o signal.o.time -f "%U" > /mnt/scratch/base-20060104/bin/sh-elf-gcc -c -D__linux__ -D__KERNEL__ > -DCONF

VCG and cfg.vcg display

2006-01-04 Thread sean yang
gcc dumps a vcg file to represent the CFG, but I can't find a site to download VCG source and compile it. I did a little search online and understood it's about GPL licence for VCG. Can someone tell me where to it work? --I just want to display the cfg.vcg files. A related question is "does

to map binary addresses to instructions

2006-01-04 Thread sean yang
I think I have a pretty specific functionality to achieve. I appreciate your suggestion and help. Here is what I want, and I attach an example at the end. I want to know the address of some function call sites. for example, I want to know is the address of call 8048380 . (see line "8048366:

Re: Slightly OT: Subversion 1.3.0 Now Available

2006-01-04 Thread Ranjit Mathew
On 1/4/06, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wonder if gcc.gnu.org would be moving to this > > version any time soon. > > gcc.gnu.org has been running 1.3 development and rc's for many months > now. > > (1.3.0 has been in release candidate mode for about 2 months now :P) Yes, I know t

Re: Slightly OT: Subversion 1.3.0 Now Available

2006-01-04 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:37 +0530, Ranjit Mathew wrote: > On 1/4/06, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I wonder if gcc.gnu.org would be moving to this > > > version any time soon. > > > > gcc.gnu.org has been running 1.3 development and rc's for many months > > now. > > > > (1.3.0 has

Re: Time to add new copyright years...

2006-01-04 Thread Ranjit Mathew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Just to remember you all that before committing a patch, you now have to > check if the copyright year includes 2006. IANAL, but I think it is sufficient to indicate the year the copyrighted entity was first published and the l

Re: Time to add new copyright years...

2006-01-04 Thread DJ Delorie
> IANAL, Well, Eben *is* a lawyer, and he says to do it the way we do it. So we do. If you want to know why, go to gnu.misc.discuss. GCC developers just do what we're told as far as this is concerned.