Re: Patch reviews for 4.1

Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Middle-End > -- > 23109 > 23948 These are the same patch, and it's too complicated for me. > 24365 Looks plausible but I don't understand the code well enough. > 24483 Approved. > 24589 Approved. > 23155 Approved. > 24408 The followup

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Branko Čibej wrote: Joe Buck wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 06:28:42PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 14:33 -0800, Mike Stump wrote: On Nov 2, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Joern RENNECKE wrote: I tried: bash-2.05b$ svn diff Makefile.in svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/

toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking

I've been working on PR libfortran/21547: f951 is linked with libgmp, but when this library is shared and located in a non-standard path, building with ./configure --with-gmp=/foo/bar fails because the correct $(RPATH_ENVVAR) is not set when building the libgfortran. The conclusions I draw afte

RE: Patch reviews for 4.1

Mark Mitchell wrote: > This rather horrid URL: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type= allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.1&target_milestone=4.0.3&target_milestone=4.1.0&kn own_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_ty pe=allword

Re: toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking

- I should add a GMPLBISDIR variable in the configure.in to store the paths to the libraries as a colon-separated list of absolute paths - the GMPLIBSDIR should be added to the HOST_LIB_PATH Yes. - then, i don't really know how this should come into HOST_LIB_PATH; perhaps by way of HOST

Re: Patch reviews for 4.1

Middle-End -- >> >> [snip approvals] This only leaves out the two patches for 23948 and 24365, which are both showstoppers; plus 24408, whose audit trail says it's rather hard to fix it in 4.1. Paolo

Re: Howto Cross Compile GCC to run on PPC Platform

I am using the AMCC 440SP processor. I went and bought "Building Embedded Linux Systems" by Karim Yaghmour. It seems to be a pretty complete book, and I have gotten the cross-compiler completely installed, but it doesn't get into installing a native compiler. However, I tried cross compiling gcc

Re: Howto Cross Compile GCC to run on PPC Platform

Jeff Stevens wrote: .../gcc-3.4.4/configure --build=`../gcc-3.4.4/config.guess` --target=powerpc-linux --host=powerpc-linux --prefix=${PREFIX} --enable-languages=c and then a make all. The make went fine, and completed without any errors. However, when I ran 'make install' I got the following

Re: Howto Cross Compile GCC to run on PPC Platform

I am creating the target tree on my host, so that I can later transfer it to a USB storage device. I was going to manually move everything, but only saw one binary, xgcc. Is that all, or aren't there some other utilities that go along with it? I just didn't know exactly what to copy and where to

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Branko Čibej wrote: It certainly seems that --old and --new are redundant. I suggest a search in http://svn.haxx.se/dev/. What should we search for? I tried both of --old and --new, and both searches came up empty. Also, you could consider stealing some ideas from Perforce, where

cross newlib builds on svn head

Hi, I have been trying to build sparc-rtems4.7 on the head using newlib's head for a few days now. I have finally narrowed the behavior down. If I configure for sparc I am configuring for sparc-rtems4.7 with c and c++, it builds fine. The build process uses xgcc for newlib as one would ex

Re: Howto Cross Compile GCC to run on PPC Platform

Jeff Stevens wrote: I am creating the target tree on my host, so that I can later transfer it to a USB storage device. I was going to manually move everything, but only saw one binary, xgcc. Is that all, or aren't there some other utilities that go along with it? The 'cpp', 'cc1*', 'collect2

[gfortran] Problem parsing hexadecimal constants?

Dear all, Firstly, let me say that I don't know that much about Fortran, but I use a source-code transformation tool that creates Fortran 77 code, which I feed to gfortran. During this last stage, gfortran seems to have some problems to parse hexadecimal constants. I managed to reduce the pr

interesting anecdote on gcc speed

Many of us worry about the compiler getting slower over time, so I was pleased to see a bit of good news from Planet Debian. Norbert Tretkowski reports on his blog at http://www.inittab.de/blog/2005/11/03#20051103_gcc33vs40 : > Comparing gcc 3.3 and 4.0 > Kernel 2.6.14 builds fine with gcc 4.0

Re: interesting anecdote on gcc speed

True! The same applies also to GNU C++ and MICO as a testing base. In fact every compiler from the 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 4.0 set is faster than previous line. Well, 4.0.x is really fast! Only Intel's C++ and Sun's C++ are faster (comparison made on linux and on solaris) when optimization is switche

Re: bug 24599

A question for the general group. Is it really the case that it's ok that a testcase clobbers boolean_true_node and sets overflow? (and is this one case of a more general problem?) If that's not unintended, ok, but it seems confusing (aka source of bugs). Or, which is certainly not unexpected, is

GCC mainline now open for bug fixes under normal Stage 3 rules

There are now 99 serious regressions against GCC 4.1. >From now until November 18th, the GCC mainline will be open for bug fixes under the usual Stage 3 rules, rather than the more restrictive rules we've been operating under recently. On November 18th, I plan to make the branch and open Stage 1

timezone of svn server for -r?

What timezone does the svn server use when I specify time & date with -r? With cvs that was never an issue because I appended UTC to the time, but svn rejects that, so it seems I have to convert the time into whatever timezone the server happens to use.

diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

I've a working copy of a branch in which I merged changes from mainline - including the deletion of the .cvsignore files. When I try to diff a diretory, it errors out on the .cvsignore files. Is there an option not to diff files that don't exist? bash-2.05b$ svn diff --old svn+ssh://[EMAIL

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

On Nov 2, 2005, at 7:45 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: However, before coming up with a zillion suggestions about how to make the syntax nicer, please do consider the idea that we did put a lot of thought into the diff syntax, and that covering all the uses and edge cases and is not easy. Any sys

Re: -Wuninitialized issues

> From: Jeffrey A Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 19:17:06 -0700 > > On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 20:44 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > People who use -Wall -Werror are _already_ pissed off about > > -Wuninitialized. It virtually guarantees that your build will fail on > > a new re

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

[(I've copied this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], because there were questions about what users actually wanted)] On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 11:23 -0800, Mike Stump wrote: > On Nov 2, 2005, at 7:45 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > However, before coming up with a zillion suggestions about how to > > make the synta

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

On Nov 3, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Joern RENNECKE wrote: bash-2.05b$ svn diff --old svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/ trunk/gcc --new gcc /usr/bin/diff -up -F'^(' -u -L gcc/.cvsignore (.../svn+ssh:// [EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc) (revision 0) -L gcc/.cvsignore (.../gcc) (revis

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 07:15:22PM +, Joern RENNECKE wrote: > Index: gcc/.cvsignore > === > /usr/bin/diff -up -F'^(' -u -L gcc/.cvsignore > (.../svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc) (revision 0) -L > gcc/.cvsignore

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 07:15:22PM +, Joern RENNECKE wrote: Index: gcc/.cvsignore === /usr/bin/diff -up -F'^(' -u -L gcc/.cvsignore (.../svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc) (revision

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 08:08:27PM +, Joern RENNECKE wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 07:15:22PM +, Joern RENNECKE wrote: > > > > > >>Index: gcc/.cvsignore > >>=== > >>/usr/bin/diff -up -F'^(' -u

Re: bug 24599

It seems like there's a whole range of issues once boolean_true_node (or any such global tree node) has been clobbered. #include int main (int argc, char **argv) { if ((bool)((1527719483 + 1477819644))) { } return 0; } bool t1 = true; --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O3 -S foo2.

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: Whatever you want. It should probably either return success, or use -N. I also get a failure when I comment out the diff-cmd line in my ~/.subversion/config . Does that mean that every subversion configuration that doesn't configure a diff-cmd to deal with non-

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: Whatever you want. It should probably either return success, or use -N. P.S.: When I use a diff-cmd with -N, I not only get a diff for the 44 files that are different, but also a header for each of the 752 files that are identical, i.e. two lines for each file

svn repository incorrectly converted or corrupted

cvs version version 1.1.1.1.2.1 of gcc/libjava/classpath/java/awt/im/InputContext.java , i.e. the sh-elf-4_1-branch head, is supposed to correspond to svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/branches/sh-elf-4_1-branch/libjava/classpath/java/awt/im/[EMAIL PROTECTED] . However, every single line that

Re: weird installation problem on i686-pc-linux-gnu

On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 02:35, Martin Reinecke wrote: > Unfortunately I have no way of finding out more about the local "install", > as it doesn't accept the --help flag: Did you check to see if it might be a shell script? If so, there might be comments in it. If it isn't a shell script, then runn

Re: timezone of svn server for -r?

Joern RENNECKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What timezone does the svn server use when I specify time & date with -r? > With cvs that was never an issue because I appended UTC to the time, but svn > rejects that, so it seems I have to convert the time into whatever > timezone the server > happen

Re: weird installation problem on i686-pc-linux-gnu

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:25:28AM -0800, James E Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 02:35, Martin Reinecke wrote: > > Unfortunately I have no way of finding out more about the local "install", > > as it doesn't accept the --help flag: > > Did you check to see if it might be a shell script? If

Re: toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking

>> - with this patch, the libgfortran is built, but the gfortran >> testsuite doesn't run; why isn't $(RPATH_ENVVAR) including HOST_LIB_PATH >> for the testsuite? > > It should Well, it doesn't. The problem is that the gfortran testsuite is not run with the toplevel Makefile, but by going into t

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Paolo Bonzini wrote: More formally, you can say that any file in the checkout is made of BASE/DIR/filename where BASE is the URL passed to the latest `svn co' or `svn switch' command. The current SVN working copy philosophy (the same as CVS's, by the way) is that every working copy directory is

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Joern RENNECKE wrote: Branko Čibej wrote: It certainly seems that --old and --new are redundant. I suggest a search in http://svn.haxx.se/dev/. What should we search for? I tried both of --old and --new, and both searches came up empty. Heh, that's Google search for you... Try

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Joern RENNECKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > export > gcc_4_1_1_release='svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/tags/gcc_4_1_1_release' Btw, if you put the following in your ~/.ssh/config: Host gcc.gnu.org User amylaar you don't have to specify the username in the svn URL (or any other ssh com

Re: toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking

François-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (after all, make check-gcc and make check-g++ > can be run from the toplevel makefile) The toplevel makefile only knows about check-gcc, which translates to "cd gcc; make check" (modulo variable passing). If you want to run only the g++ tests

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Branko Čibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> More formally, you can say that any file in the checkout is made of >> BASE/DIR/filename where BASE is the URL passed to the latest `svn co' or >> svn switch' command. > The current SVN working copy philosophy (the same as CVS's, b

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Andreas Schwab wrote: Branko Čibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paolo Bonzini wrote: More formally, you can say that any file in the checkout is made of BASE/DIR/filename where BASE is the URL passed to the latest `svn co' or svn switch' command. The current SVN working copy phil

Re: svn repository incorrectly converted or corrupted

On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 21:27 +, Joern RENNECKE wrote: > cvs version version 1.1.1.1.2.1 of > gcc/libjava/classpath/java/awt/im/InputContext.java , i.e. the > sh-elf-4_1-branch head, > is supposed to correspond to > svn+ssh://[EMAIL > PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/branches/sh-elf-4_1-branch/libjava/class

Re: svn url shortcuts

This is crude, but it lets you use "tag:foo/bar/grill" as a repository, and it replaces the "tag:foo" with a matching entry in ~/.svnrc like this: tag foo svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/whatever So, with a .svnrc like this: tag trunk svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk tag 4.0 svn://gcc.gnu.org/sv

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Branko Čibej wrote: "--old" "--new" Hmm, that finds a lot more, although not specific to options. I've found one thread that seems slightly relevant, Diff syntax changes for issue #1093 . I get the impression that you

Re: svn repository incorrectly converted or corrupted

Daniel Berlin wrote: Simply do a recopy of libjava from the approriate tag, and all will be well. Do you have a list of potentially affected files?

Re: svn repository incorrectly converted or corrupted

On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 23:49 +, Joern RENNECKE wrote: > Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > > > > > > >Simply do a recopy of libjava from the approriate tag, and all will be > >well. > > > > > Do you have a list of potentially affected files? Anything on vendor imports from classpath. Unless you'

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Joern Rennecke wrote: but you should be able to name a branch/tag and thus imply a root directory for the location, in the current head revision unless modified with @rev-number (on the branch name) or -D. P.S.: instead of adding a -D option we could also a syntax of -r [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

Joern RENNECKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S.: When I use a diff-cmd with -N, I not only get a diff for the 44 > files that are different, > but also a header for each of the 752 files that are identical, i.e. > two lines for each file like: > > Index: gcc/tree-ssa-operands.c >

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:58:11AM +0100, Giovanni Bajo wrote: > Joern RENNECKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > P.S.: When I use a diff-cmd with -N, I not only get a diff for the 44 > > files that are different, > > but also a header for each of the 752 files that are identical, i.e. > > two line

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 20:36 +, Joern RENNECKE wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > > >Whatever you want. It should probably either return success, or use -N. > > > > > > > P.S.: When I use a diff-cmd with -N, I not only get a diff for the 44 > files that are different, Don't use

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 12:03 -0800, Mike Stump wrote: > On Nov 3, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Joern RENNECKE wrote: > > bash-2.05b$ svn diff --old svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/ > > trunk/gcc --new gcc > > > /usr/bin/diff -up -F'^(' -u -L gcc/.cvsignore (.../svn+ssh:// > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gc

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 20:18 +, Joern RENNECKE wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > > >Whatever you want. It should probably either return success, or use -N. > > > > > I also get a failure when I comment out the diff-cmd line in my > ~/.subversion/config . > Does that mean that ev

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 19:13 -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 12:03 -0800, Mike Stump wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Joern RENNECKE wrote: > > > bash-2.05b$ svn diff --old svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/ > > > trunk/gcc --new gcc > > > > > /usr/bin/diff -up -F'^('

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

I'm replying to a thread off of gcc-devel, but as I think I may have just had a thought that hasn't already been chewed through. So, I'm shifting to subversion-devel. If I'm wrong and this is already debunked, just shoot me down... Branko Čibej wrote: > Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Branko Čibej <[EMA

Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Kevin Puetz wrote: I'm replying to a thread off of gcc-devel, but as I think I may have just had a thought that hasn't already been chewed through. So, I'm shifting to subversion-devel. If I'm wrong and this is already debunked, just shoot me down... Branko Čibej wrote: Andreas Schwab wrote

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

>> cvs would never do such nonsense. >Absolutely! It would just print all the directory names in the middle of the >diffs. I call that nonsense as well. But the directory names go to stderr. When you redirect stdout to a file, a diff without the directory names is written to that file, while yo

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

> What version of svn? The 1.3 release candidate. > What is the exact branch you are trying to diff?? I had checked out a copy of the sh-elf-4_1-branch, and used svn merge to apply the patches from the last merge point to the current mainline. This merge deleted the .cvsignore file in my workin

Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 20:29 -0500, Joern Rennecke wrote: > > What version of svn? > > The 1.3 release candidate. > > > What is the exact branch you are trying to diff?? > > I had checked out a copy of the sh-elf-4_1-branch, and used > svn merge to apply the patches from the last merge point to >

Re: toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking

François-Xavier Coudert wrote: - with this patch, the libgfortran is built, but the gfortran testsuite doesn't run; why isn't $(RPATH_ENVVAR) including HOST_LIB_PATH for the testsuite? It should Well, it doesn't. The problem is that the gfortran testsuite is not run with the topl