Re: A couple more subversion notes

2005-10-20 Thread Bernd Schmidt
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: It seems that svn is unable to send all its requests to the svn repo over one ssh connection. In one test I just did I had to enter the ssh password five times. man ssh-agent Bernd

Re: A couple more subversion notes

2005-10-20 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > It seems that svn is unable to send all its requests to the svn | > repo over one ssh connection. In one test I just did I had to enter | > the ssh password five times. | | man ssh-agent The connection is still set up fiv

Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion

2005-10-20 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 02:10:36PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 07:25 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 02:47:19PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > * Daniel Berlin: > > > > > > > You could simply do non-recursive checkouts (svn co -N) of the dirs you >

Re: A couple more subversion notes

2005-10-20 Thread Richard Kenner
Lars Gullik Bj=F8nnes wrote: > It seems that svn is unable to send all its requests to the svn > repo over one ssh connection. In one test I just did I had to enter > the ssh password five times. man ssh-agent You're missing the point: he's making an efficiency argument. Name

Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion

2005-10-20 Thread Daniel Berlin
> > I actually forgot the dumbest and easiest solution, that works fine, > > that is, to use svn switch. > > > > checkout a gcc copy. > > > > go to the gcc subdir > > > > svn switch svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/emptydir ada > > > > repeat for each dir you don't want. > > > > This allow

Re: Is gcc optimized for thread level parallelism?

2005-10-20 Thread Diego Novillo
On Thursday 20 October 2005 19:12, Jim Wilson wrote: > See http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gomp/ > > This is still in early stages of implementation. Don't expect anything > to work yet. > Indeed. The implementation is at a stage where the C front end can be tested with benchmarks (openmpbench_C an

Re: A couple more subversion notes

2005-10-20 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 02:19 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > It seems that svn is unable to send all its requests to the svn > | > repo over one ssh connection. In one test I just did I had to enter > | > the ssh p

Re: peep2_next_insn returns PEEP2_EOB

2005-10-20 Thread Kaz Kojima
Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. We check peep2_current_count to validate this. I'd like to take a look at why peep2_current_count doesn't work as expected for the problematic case. Thanks for the suggestion. Regards, kaz

Re: A couple more subversion notes

2005-10-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
There have been no answers on the following point... On 2005-10-19 16:44:59 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > $ svn log Makefile.in | more > > figure out that the last two revs are 105364 and 103893 (and now I > guess I understand svn status --verbose output). These are the last two revs *up to* yo

Re: A couple more subversion notes

2005-10-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-10-19 17:12:32 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > > The ssh multiplexing stuff just written up on the wiki should help. > > Thanks, I will have a look. This requires an update to OpenSSH >= 4.0, > so I cannot test that right now. For those without OpenSSH >= 4.0, can't fsh be a solution? (AFA

Re: A couple more subversion notes

2005-10-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-10-20 14:46:36 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I agree. For example, Fink on the Mac only has svn 1.1 (not that this > is a showstopper IMHO), FYI, DarwinPorts currently has svn 1.2.3, which can be installed very easily. > and Debian testing is "stuck" with the latest 3.8 openssh. Why no

Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion

2005-10-20 Thread Paul Thomas
Dear All, I spent nearly 5 hours yesterday reading the svn FAQ, mailing list archives, and the docs. I never came across this solution. Could somebody please distill the wisdom from this thread onto the Wiki? I can understand why Steve might send 5 hours on it. It's bad that one person

make bootstrap results: GCC 4.0.2, i686-pc-cygwin

2005-10-20 Thread Thomas I. Burbage
config.guess => i686-pc-cygwin $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-cygwin Configured with: /cygdrive/e/gcc-4.0.2/configure Thread model: single gcc version 4.0.2 I didn't take any special action regarding "Whether you enabled all languages or a subset of them." (accepted defaults)

<    1   2