Dear Netflix User,
Your email has reached an automated mailbox. Email sent to this
address does not reach our Customer Service team and will not
receive a personal response.
If you have a question you need answered right away, please visit
our online Help Center at http://www.netflix.com/Help. It
Dear Listers,
I posted this question on the GCC-help list but maybe someone here can give
me some advice on how to proceed also.
I am working on a VC++ to gcc conversion, and I'm facing some problems that
I cannot find the answers for. I'm working on a Windows XP machine with
cygwin installed and
Hi,
Since October 13, SPEC's swim, applu, and sixtrack fail to build and
fma3d has a
serious performance degradation. See the results from Diego's SPEC
tester:
http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000.i686/gcc/individual-run-ratio.html
Gr.
Steven
Following code generate a _dubious_ warning message:
int main(void) {
const char * const literal = "xxx";
fprintf(stderr, literal);
return 0;
}
cc -Wall -Wformat-security -o main main.c
main.c: In function `main':
main.c:9: warning: format not a string literal and no format argumen
Hi Dave,
Thanks for that patch. It has taken me a while to get around to using
it, but it is very useful. I've attached a version which works with the
current mainline.
Was there any particular reason why you haven't submitted it to
mainline, as I'm sure that others could benefit from it?
Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> main:
> leal4(%esp), %ecx # create argument pointer
> andl$-16, %esp# align stack
> pushl -4(%ecx) # copy return address
This will misaligned the call/ret stack in the CPU, leading t
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Since October 13, SPEC's swim, applu, and sixtrack fail to build and
> fma3d has a serious performance degradation. See the results from
> Diego's SPEC tester:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000.i686/gcc/individual-run
* Roel Bindels:
> I posted this question on the GCC-help list but maybe someone here
> can give me some advice on how to proceed also.
The advice you'll get here is exactly the same: post a small example
which reproduces the error message which troubles you.
(Please continue the discussion on gc
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:49:05AM +0200, Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
> Following code generate a _dubious_ warning message:
>
> int main(void) {
> const char * const literal = "xxx";
> fprintf(stderr, literal);
> return 0;
> }
>
> cc -Wall -Wformat-security -o main main.c
> main.c: In
* Joe Buck | 2005-10-17 09:28:51 [-0700]:
>If we go down that route, the option would only work correctly if
>optimization is enabled, because you expect gcc to trace the source
>of pointers, and see what the pointers point to, and check the original
>strings for format characters.
ACK - gcc beha
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:25:46PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > main:
> > leal4(%esp), %ecx # create argument pointer
> > andl$-16, %esp # align stack
> > pushl -4(%ecx)# copy return address
>
> This will misaligned the call/ret
Peter Barada wrote:
Does the uberbaum tree exist on savanna, or is it only on
sources.redhat.com? If so, what is the procedure for accessing it?
I would not recommend use of uberbaum. There are some old-time
ex-Cygnus hackers that use it, because it gives an environment familiar
to the one
What's the magic incantation to get gcc with subversion?
I've read the wiki page, but
troutmask:sgk[205] svn co svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
svn: Connection closed unexpectedly
--
Steve
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:15 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> What's the magic incantation to get gcc with subversion?
> I've read the wiki page, but
>
> troutmask:sgk[205] svn co svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
> Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
> svn: Connection closed unexpectedly
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:25:18PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:15 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > What's the magic incantation to get gcc with subversion?
> > I've read the wiki page, but
> >
> > troutmask:sgk[205] svn co svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
> > Permission
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:36 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:25:18PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:15 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > What's the magic incantation to get gcc with subversion?
> > > I've read the wiki page, but
> > >
> > > troutmask:
* Steve Kargl:
>> Uh, since it appears you are logged in with a different name, you want
>> svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/trunk
>
> Odd, I don't need to do anything special with cvs.
Once you've checked out a tree, CVS stores the remote user in the
CVS/Root file. Maybe you have only
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:59:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Steve Kargl:
>
> >> Uh, since it appears you are logged in with a different name, you want
> >> svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/trunk
> >
> > Odd, I don't need to do anything special with cvs.
>
> Once you've checked o
Currently, I get this:
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -c
-g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros
-Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -Werror -DOBJCPLUS
-I../
I modified the gcc i386 backend. Now my gcc optimizes function prologue
movq%rbx, -16(%rsp)
movq%rbp, -8(%rsp)
subq$16, %rsp
to
movq%rbx, -16(%rsp)
movq%rbp, -8(%rsp)
pushq %rax
pushq %rax
The change was introduced b
Jakub,
Have you made any progress on fixing this? I would rather that the
debug information is not available than that equivalence is broken.
Best regards
Paul
>I have a question. It is OK to turn stack pointer addition into
>pop instructions with a scratch register. But I don't see how you can
>turn stack pointer substraction into push instructions with a
>scratch register since push will change the contents of the stack,
>in addition to stack pointer.
Hi,
I have a fairly decent knowledge about compiler internals, object
oriented programming and algorithms. I would like to make a
non-trivial contribution to gcc/g++. I am interested in adding a new
optimization phase or improving some existing ones or write stuff
related to OO program compilati
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote:
> Have you made any progress on fixing this? I would rather that the
> debug information is not available than that equivalence is broken.
I've been working on it. Is there a PR?
r~
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:08:59PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote:
> > Have you made any progress on fixing this? I would rather that the
> > debug information is not available than that equivalence is broken.
>
> I've been working o
Ganesh Bikshandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a fairly decent knowledge about compiler internals, object
> oriented programming and algorithms. I would like to make a
> non-trivial contribution to gcc/g++. I am interested in adding a new
> optimization phase or improving some existing on
26 matches
Mail list logo
