On 2005-10-03, at 06:05, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcin Dalecki wrote:
|
| On 2005-10-03, at 00:26, Andrew Pinski wrote:
|
|>
|> This perl script works just fine for me on powerpc-darwin7.9.0
I don't
|> see why are we piping the output to nm when
Hi,
I wrote a new pass following the examples listed in the wiki
pages. However, when I "../gcc/configure; make bootstrap", I got
error messages like:
/xgcc -B./ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem
/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-inclu
> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:831,
> from ../../gcc/gcc/tsystem.h:90,
> from ../../gcc/gcc/crtstuff.c:62:
> /usr/include/bits/stdio.h: In function 'vprintf':
> /usr/include/bits/stdio.h:37: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
You are getting a
On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:41 AM, Brian Rose wrote:
I am an embedded software developer and I am interested in using
GCC as a
cross-compiler on the Cygwin/Windows platform. I would like to know
which lists I should subscribe to in order to discuss this effort.
There is not one. Each issue you may
On Oct 2, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
[~] g++ -Wall a.cpp
a.cpp: In function `int main()':
a.cpp:4: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
And -Werror turns it into a hard error...
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 04:50:41PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Going from the mailing lists there are about ten of us heavily
> involved in gcc here in the UK. I'm not sure how you'd choose
> someone, given that gcc is a collective effort.
My suggestion: anyone who is listed in the MAINTAINERS f
This is a summary report of a (failed) attempt to address memory and
compile-time usage of large (static array) initializers. The problem
is that we both use TREEs to do array indices arithmetic in
c-typeck.c:process_init_element and that we pin down memory for
INTEGER_CST tree nodes in both th
I would subscribe to the MinGW list as this is a key technology to
making cygwin/windows cross compiling work
http://www.mingw.org/
On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:41 AM, Brian Rose wrote:
I am an embedded software developer and I am interested in using
GCC as a
cross-compiler on the Cygwin/Windows p
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 07:52:41PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> A real solution would ditch TREE indices in favor of HOST_WIDE_INT ones...
A real solution would have a tree node that can represent an arbitrarily
large block of target memory as a binary blob. As much as possible,
the actual da
> "Richard" == Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> On current mainline-gcc install-pkglibLTLIBRARIES fails re-linking
Richard> libjawtgnu:
Richard> The -L/usr/lib/classpath -lgtkpeer seems bogous, we don't
Richard> have classpath installed (yet).
We shouldn't be installing
Hi Uros,
Since you are the one who enabled fisttp, I figure I should send this
email to you directly.
Let me know what you think. I kind of agree with your argument. But
for practical reasons I thinkg -msse3 should enable fisttp. Certainly
here in Apple, a few folks have been surprised by
My mistake. I misunderstood the meaning of -msse3 (it only enables
the sse3 builtins). Please ignore.
On Sep 29, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
Hi,
I know this has been discussed in bug 18668. But I'd like to bring
it up again.
Currently, fisttp is only generated with -march=prescot
On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:56 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
My mistake. I misunderstood the meaning of -msse3 (it only enables the
sse3 builtins). Please ignore.
Actually it enables more than the builtins. It enables the use sse3
instructions. This is just like -maltivec on PowerPC and -msse and
-msse
Well, both Intel and AMD calls fisttp a SSE3 instruction even though
it operates on the x87 stack ST(0). My argument is users who specify -
msse3 to turn on SSE3 instructions would expect fisttp be turned on
as well.
But according to the manual -msse3 does not turn on generation of
SSE3 in
Actually it enables more than the builtins. It enables the use sse3
instructions. This is just like -maltivec on PowerPC and -msse and
-msse
on x86, etc.
Right, so the manual disagrees and should probably be fixed.
And then RTH agreed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01432.h
Daniel Berlin wrote:
BJE has converted most of the client side scripts in the contrib
directory. I have to see what is left and conver the rest.
I looked pretty carefully through every file in that directory. You should find that
it is all taken care of.
Cheers, Ben
On Oct 3, 2005, at 6:41 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
But according to the manual -msse3 does not turn on generation of SSE3
instructions:
The manual is semi-confusing I had forgot about that.
There is a bug about the issue recorded as PR 23809:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23809
Tha
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 08:46:20AM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> >BJE has converted most of the client side scripts in the contrib
> >directory. I have to see what is left and conver the rest.
>
> I looked pretty carefully through every file in that directory. You shoul
Kean Johnston wrote:
I think svn is a great tool, don't get me wrong. Very well
written and got all the features one could want. But I
don't know (or see) the actual problem you are trying to
solve. cvs seems to be wroking really well for gcc.
I could have said the complete opposite. For my G
Hi all,
I am currently developing a GCC port for my own generic 32 bit
processor. I have this following error when I tried to compile a
benchmark.
(insn 1497 1924 1756 2 (set (mem:BI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 2 r2)
(const_int -137 [0xff77])) [72 S1 A8])
(le:BI (reg:SI 12 r1
"Balaji V. Iyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
No need to send to both gcc@gcc.gnu.org and [EMAIL PROTECTED] I
removed gcc-help in this reply. Thanks.
>I am currently developing a GCC port for my own generic 32 bit
> processor. I have this following error when I tried to compile a
> benchmark
Thank you very much Ian and Shreyas for your quick response. So I guess,
my question now would be, what would be an exmple that matches this
constraint below?
((insn 1497 1924 1756 2 (set (mem:BI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 2 r2)
(const_int -137 [0xff77])) [72 S1 A8])
(le:BI (r
"Balaji V. Iyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thank you very much Ian and Shreyas for your quick response. So I guess,
> my question now would be, what would be an exmple that matches this
> constraint below?
>
> ((insn 1497 1924 1756 2 (set (mem:BI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 2 r2)
> (co
The number of bugs targeted at GCC 4.1 has declined to 225 from 250 in
my September 7th status report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00179.html
The number of critical (wrong-code, ice-on-valid, rejects-valid)
regressions has declined to 61 from 77. So, we're still fixing about
one net reg
24 matches
Mail list logo
