>> * builtins.def: Add DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN to define builtins
>> that C99 reserve for future use. Use it to define clog10, clog10f
>> and clog10l.
>
> Ok.
Commited.
Thanks,
FX
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, 15:53:21 +0200, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 17:53 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 05:44:44PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > > Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > >Does this look familiar to anyone?
> > > >
> > > I was having troubles doing a build a
Hi Dan,
Commands for querying open bugs for a specific target (say 3.4.5) of
a product do not seem to exist. The documentation for "index" says
index
But what I'm looking for is something like
index
probably augmented with "known-to-fail" or "known-to-work". But the
pressing
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 19:44 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Commands for querying open bugs for a specific target (say 3.4.5) of
> a product do not seem to exist. The documentation for "index" says
>
> index
>
> But what I'm looking for is something like
>
> index
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > But what I'm looking for is something like
| >
| > index
| >
| > probably augmented with "known-to-fail" or "known-to-work". But the
| > pressing need for me is the ability to specify the target.
|
|
| I just added this form.
| Give it a tr
On Saturday, July 23, 2005, at 05:42 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I have quite a surpising behavior with gcc when compiling the
following code (*). Here is the output:
Using:
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 1671)
g++-4.0 --version
powerpc-apple-darwin8-g++-
Fixed now
Sorry about that.
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 21:03 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > But what I'm looking for is something like
> | >
> | > index
> | >
> | > probably augmented with "known-to-fail" or "known-to-work". But the
> | > pr
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Fixed now
Indeed. works now.
It would be great if bugzilla could send a notice back when it decides
to ignore commands :-)
| Sorry about that.
No problem. Thanks for the quick fix!
-- Gaby
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 22:06 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Fixed now
>
> Indeed. works now.
> It would be great if bugzilla could send a notice back when it decides
> to ignore commands :-)
Perl error handling is hard :(
>
> | Sorry about that
mrs $ g++-3.3 t7.cc
t7.cc: In constructor `A::A(int)':
t7.cc:11: warning: `A' is deprecated (declared at t7.cc:9)
t7.cc: In constructor `A::A(int)':
t7.cc:11: warning: `A' is deprecated (declared at t7.cc:9)
Yup, right testcase...
To support Panther I defined a MACRO:
# if defined(__GNUC__)
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 22:06 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Fixed now
| >
| > Indeed. works now.
| > It would be great if bugzilla could send a notice back when it decides
| > to ignore commands :
Hi,
You added the stack protector patch on May 12, but Joseph already
pointed out then that you did not add user documentation (see his
mail: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01235.html).
Can you add this documentation please?
Gr.
Steven
> OK.
>
> I have one more request.
>
> Is it possible for "index" to also output the number of matches found,
> as first line? (just like with the web interface).
>
> One thing I would also find quite valuable is that the description
> contains the component name, e.g.
>
> c++/21784:
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Done on both counts.
Great!
Thanks,
-- Gaby
Hi all,
Are there any open-source(or free) front-end which translates C++ to C?
I could find some commercial things - Comeau, AT&T Cfront, etc., but
these have many limitations(especially, It's too difficult to get cfront
because there are few cfront-based compiler at present)
Cheers,
--
Yi-kw
Kean Johnston wrote on 22/07/2005 00:41:06:
[...]
>
> I hope someone can help me. I am C++ impaired, and I am getting
> the following error when trying to bootstrap the current 4.0.2
> CVS. The error is coming from include/ext/bitmap_allocator.h
> line 111. The relevant code snippet is:
>
> cla
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Gabriel Dos Reis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Giovanni Bajo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Ebke, Hans-Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> | > I have to write this in Outlook, so I don't even try to get the
> quoting
> | > right. Sorry. :-(
>
The error makes perfect sense. __pthread_mutex has only one
assignment operator for it (implicitly generated by the compiler):
__pthread_mutex & operator=(const __pthread_mutex&).
When you try to pass a volatile __pthread_mutex (named as
pthread_mutex_t), the compiler can't pass it to the assig
--- Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> System V Release 5 (UnixWare / OpenServer 6).
>
Your system is NOT supported by GCC, please read
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/sco/
___
How much free photo storage do you g
19 matches
Mail list logo
