Hi,all:
How can I trace the process of C++ template
Instantiation? I study Loki and some library is very
complex, so I want to see how gcc compiler instance
the template class.
alex
___
雅虎免费G邮箱-中国第一
On Monday 04 July 2005 07:59, Balaji S wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a problem with delayed branch scheduling. Problem in a DSP porting
> which has VLIW instructions and delayed branches. While scheduling delayed
> branches, GCC (3.4.3) schedules an instruction which is a part of a VLIW
> instr
_On 04-Jul-2005 15:31, Steven Bosscher san wrote_:
Add an attribute to those instructions that cannot be in delay slots,
and change this define_delay to disallow instructions with that attr?
Any instruction other than jump can be placed in the delay slot. I hope "!jump"
can fulfill this requi
On Monday 04 July 2005 12:41, Balaji S wrote:
> _On 04-Jul-2005 15:31, Steven Bosscher san wrote_:
> > Add an attribute to those instructions that cannot be in delay slots,
> > and change this define_delay to disallow instructions with that attr?
>
> Any instruction other than jump can be placed in
Hi,
I've got a problem: bugzilla sends me no registration e-mails.
I tried two times with different e-mail addresses and got nothing.
So I cannot report a gcj bug :(
You've got a nice page "Reporting Bugs" that explains what needs to be
sent, but doesn't contain a word about *where* to send. T
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:19:28PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote:
> Gunther Nikl wrote:
> >A few LINK_SPEC definitions contain a "%{Wl,*:%*}" sequence.
>
> There is no need to match -Wl options in LINK_SPEC, as it is handled by
> the gcc.c driver. The driver support was added in gcc-2.5.8. I beli
Gunther Nikl writes:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:19:28PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote:
> > Gunther Nikl wrote:
> > >A few LINK_SPEC definitions contain a "%{Wl,*:%*}" sequence.
> >
> > There is no need to match -Wl options in LINK_SPEC, as it is handled by
> > the gcc.c driver. The driver
zheng wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How can I trace the process of C++ template
> Instantiation? I study Loki and some library is very
> complex, so I want to see how gcc compiler instance
> the template class.
The source code for template processing is mostly contained in the file
cp/pt.
Ilya Mezhirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a problem: bugzilla sends me no registration e-mails.
> I tried two times with different e-mail addresses and got nothing.
> So I cannot report a gcj bug :(
>
> You've got a nice page "Reporting Bugs" that explains what needs to be
> sent, but do
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:
>
>ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/
>
> With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.
>
> Please do download tarballs from the above URL and confirm that they
> work OK on your systems.
s390(x)-ibm-
Hi all,
I am wondering if MIPS-X has been supported.
Thanks.
IM
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 01:15:19PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Gunther Nikl writes:
> >
> > Sometimes I use -Wl,-r and I tried to change what options to pass
> > depending on -r.
>
> IMO that would be really bad. The point of "-Wl" is to pass arguments
> unmolested to the linker, bypassi
So you have a few instructions bundled into a VLIW instruction, and
one of the instructions in the bundle is moved into the delay slot,
thus breaking your VLIW bundle. Right?
That is a much harder problem... I don't think it is really possible
with the existing dbr scheduling pass, but maybe
Hi,
I am interested in the recent work in gcc 4.0 with respect to "scalar
evolutions". The students in my compiler laboratory studied the
algorithm implemented in gcc 4.0. We are considering extending this
work based on our experience [4] building a similar framework for
symbolic analysis wi
The svn test repo has been updated on dberlin.org.
Please don't rape my bandwidth or my disk i/o :)
svn://www.dberlin.org/
Commits to the hooks dir will be reflected in the actual repository
hooks through the nice sync script.
If people help convert the contrib scripts and the current cvs
repos
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 15:03 +0400, Ilya Mezhirov wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've got a problem: bugzilla sends me no registration e-mails.
> I tried two times with different e-mail addresses and got nothing.
> So I cannot report a gcj bug :(
I verified the emails were getting sent to your address (or at
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:21:15AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/
>
> With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.
>
> Please do download tarballs from the above URL and confirm that they
On Jul 4, 2005, at 1:48 PM, H. J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:21:15AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/
With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.
Please do download tarballs from t
Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So you have a few instructions bundled into a VLIW instruction, and
> one of the instructions in the bundle is moved into the delay slot,
> thus breaking your VLIW bundle. Right?
I think there are two natural approaches.
1) Do the VLIW bundling afte
"Sung-Gu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought I might find a specfic directory in gcc sources whether it supports
> the files.
> I don't want to compile the whole source files. :(
gcc is just the compiler. Header files like byteswap.c and endian.c
are part of the system library. gcc does no
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 09:27:48PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Note that my complaint about the lack of endian support in that code
> still stands ;-)
I seem to recall running into this before. It's not a lack of
endian support, it's one piece lying to another about the size
of the object. Which
I plan to up-port my ST20 port to the mainline. I thought I'd first give
a description of the port and ask for some opinion. Basically, I would
like to hear, would an implementation along these lines be acceptable in
principle, and otherwise, what are the main no-go points ?
I'll try to keep it sh
"IM.Nobody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am wondering if MIPS-X has been supported.
Not by FSF releases, no. I'm not aware of a private port either,
but perhaps others know better.
Richard
AIX is good:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00216.html
David
I have another Linux machine.
And I found the following messages:
$cd /usr/include
$ more endian.h
/* Copyright (C) 1992, 1996, 1997, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of the GNU C Library.
/* This file defines `__BYTE_ORDER' for the particular machine. */
#include
$
"Sung-Gu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have another Linux machine.
> And I found the following messages:
>
>
> $cd /usr/include
>
> $ more endian.h
> /* Copyright (C) 1992, 1996, 1997, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>This file is part of the GNU C Library.
Yes. gcc is not the GNU
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 12:31 -0400, Robert van Engelen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in the recent work in gcc 4.0 with respect to "scalar
> evolutions". The students in my compiler laboratory studied the
> algorithm implemented in gcc 4.0. We are considering extending this
> work based on ou
Darwin here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00221.html
ok so far.
Andreas
On Jun 30, 2005, at 4:25 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
On Thursday 30 June 2005 04:24, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Ada is now broken on the mainline by:
2005-06-28 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Makefile.in: Set and use UNWIND_H. Install as unwind.h.
* c-decl.c (finish_decl): Call defaul
PA is ok:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00223.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00218.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00186.html
The failure of pr21817-1.c on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 is a minor
testsuite issue that is now fixed on the tru
Hi Jakub,
I am having a trouble with libssp in one-tree builds. That is, if I
try to build binutils and gcc at the same time, libssp/configure
complains while compiling (and linking) the following program and the
build process stops.
/* confdefs.h. */
#define PACKAGE_NAME "libssp"
#define PACK
Hello,
Just today, I noticed that I couldn't use bubblestrap on current gcc
trunk... It fails like this in gnattools:
../../gnatbind -C -I- -I../rts -I. -I/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/ada
-o b_gnatm.c gnatmake.ali
error: "g-dirope.adb" must be compiled
error: ("../rts/g-dirope.ali" is obsolete an
_On 05-Jul-2005 00:14, Ian Lance Taylor san wrote_:
Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So you have a few instructions bundled into a VLIW instruction, and
one of the instructions in the bundle is moved into the delay slot,
thus breaking your VLIW bundle. Right?
I think there are tw
On Jul 5, 2005, at 12:50 AM, Kazu Hirata wrote:
Hi Jakub,
I am having a trouble with libssp in one-tree builds. That is, if I
try to build binutils and gcc at the same time, libssp/configure
complains while compiling (and linking) the following program and the
build process stops.
I don't s
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So you have a few instructions bundled into a VLIW instruction, and
>> one of the instructions in the bundle is moved into the delay slot,
>> thus breaking your VLIW bundle. Right?
>
> I think there are two natural approach
Eric Botcazou wrote:
We have 1 new failure on SPARC/Solaris 2.5.1, 2.6 and 7 over RC2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00137.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00138.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00139.html
WARNING: program timed out.
Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/
With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.
Please do download tarballs from the above URL and confirm that they
work OK on your systems.
s
Daniel Berlin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 14:11 -0700, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
Certainly an option; not doing extra work is good.
4. Make sure that template types are incomplete. That is, with
TYPE_SIZE/TYPE_SIZE_UNIT unset.
I think this makes a lot of sense considering the language se
38 matches
Mail list logo