Cross compiler

2005-06-24 Thread Eric Liu
Hi, all: I need a gcc cross compiler under Cygwin. Is there any step-by-step document on how to make the cross compiler? Any help would be appriciated very much! Thanks and regards Eric

Re: Cross compiler

2005-06-24 Thread Ranjit Mathew
Eric Liu wrote: > > I need a gcc cross compiler under Cygwin. Is there any step-by-step document > on how to make the cross compiler? Any help would be appriciated very much! See: http://billgatliff.com/~bgat/twiki/bin/view/Crossgcc http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Cross%20Compiler http://gcc.gnu.

RE: Cross compiler

2005-06-24 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Ranjit Mathew >Sent: 24 June 2005 11:09 > Eric Liu wrote: >> >> I need a gcc cross compiler under Cygwin. Is there any step-by-step >> document on how to make the cross compiler? Any help would be >> appriciated very much! > > See: > > http://billgatliff.com/

Suggestion for simple feature - "beep" on finish.

2005-06-24 Thread Graham Pratt
Hi all. So much compiling is done in the wee hours of the morning and it is nice to just shut your eyes for a while when the messages are scrolling past. Trouble is, you have to take a peek every now and then to see if it is finished. A very simple feature I think would be good is when compilin

removing src/{expect,dejagnu}

2005-06-24 Thread Ben Elliston
For the second year in a row, about 30 people discussed removing the replicated copies of the DejaGnu and Expect sources from the src repository at the GCC Summit testing BOF. The version of Expect in the tree is now 9 years old. The version of DejaGnu in the tree is now two releases behind. Mod

Re: Suggestion for simple feature - "beep" on finish.

2005-06-24 Thread Andreas Schwab
Graham Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So much compiling is done in the wee hours of the morning and it is nice to > just shut your eyes for a while when the messages are scrolling past. Trouble > is, you have to take a peek every now and then to see if it is finished. A > very simple feat

Re: Suggestion for simple feature - "beep" on finish.

2005-06-24 Thread Robert Dewar
Andreas Schwab wrote: Graham Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: So much compiling is done in the wee hours of the morning and it is nice to just shut your eyes for a while when the messages are scrolling past. Trouble is, you have to take a peek every now and then to see if it is finished. A

Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's?

2005-06-24 Thread Sergei Organov
Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jun 20, 2005, at 11:28 AM, Sergei Organov wrote: > > > Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> On Jun 20, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Sergei Organov wrote: > >> > >>> so SYMBOL_FLAG_SMALL (flags 0x6 vs 0x2) is somehow being missed when -O1 > > >>

Re: removing src/{expect,dejagnu}

2005-06-24 Thread Mark Kettenis
From: Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:50:58 +1000 For the second year in a row, about 30 people discussed removing the replicated copies of the DejaGnu and Expect sources from the src repository at the GCC Summit testing BOF. The version of Expect in t

[RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86

2005-06-24 Thread Fariborz Jahanian
A source file mrSurfaceList.cc of 252.eon produces less efficient code initializing instance objects to 0 at -O2 than at -O1. Behavior is random and it does not happen on all x86 platforms and making the test smaller makes the problem go away. But here is what I found out is the cause. W

Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86

2005-06-24 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Jun 24, 2005, at 6:07 PM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote: A source file mrSurfaceList.cc of 252.eon produces less efficient code initializing instance objects to 0 at -O2 than at -O1. Behavior is random and it does not happen on all x86 platforms and making the test smaller makes the problem go

Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project)

2005-06-24 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Giovanni Bajo wrote: > It would help also if you add to the wiki explanation of what exactly all > these options do. Especially bubblestrap vs quickstrap vs restrap. Why to the WIki?? This should be part of the regular documentation, and if anything is to improve, the improve

Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86

2005-06-24 Thread fjahanian
On Jun 24, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: I wonder why combine can do the simplification though which is why still produce good code for the simple testcase: void f1(double *d,float *f2) { *f2 = 0.0; *d = 0.0; } It is hard to reproduce the simple test case, exhibiting the same

Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86

2005-06-24 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Saturday 25 June 2005 01:48, fjahanian wrote: > On Jun 24, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > I wonder why combine can do the simplification though which is why > > still > > produce good code for the simple testcase: > > void f1(double *d,float *f2) > > { > > *f2 = 0.0; > > *d = 0.0

RSS feed for webpage?

2005-06-24 Thread Sam Lauber
Would it be possible for the GCC webpage to have a RSS feed for the news? Samuel Lauber -- ___ Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way: Download Opera 8 at http://www.opera.com