On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:32:26AM +0800, zouq wrote:
> the MAX_INSNS_PER_PEEP2 is 3,
> when the program case is :
> mul.d $f1, $f1, $f0
> add.d $f2, $f2, $f1
> sub.d $f3, $f3, $f2
So what's the problem?
r~
Hi,
I have thinking about how to overcome part of the "double-setter" difficulties
that arise when implementing cc0->CCmode conversion for a couple of targets:
IIUC correctly one of the two or three difficulties with cc0->CCmode
conversion is, that combine in it's present form is not able to
rec
While strolling through the dark corners of the testsuite, as one
does :-), I discovered the gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunct-5.c testcase.
How can goto's out of a nested fn to the containing fn possibly work?
Here foo() & bar() have different stack-frames, saved registers, etc.
void foo()
{
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4_0-branch/configure
--prefix=/home/karel/usr/local/gcc-4_0-branch-20050514 --enable-shared
--enable-threads --enable-languages=c++ --disable-checking
--enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.1 20050514 (prerel
Hello,
just short follow-up to this thread. I've also tried gcc head (from today)
and its libstdc++ is OK, i.e. no dead-lock presented. I've also verified
that it is libstdc++ and not libgcc_s.
Any idea what's going wrong with GCC 4.0.x's libstdc++?
Thanks,
Karel
On May 14, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
Hello,
just short follow-up to this thread. I've also tried gcc head (from
today) and its libstdc++ is OK, i.e. no dead-lock presented. I've also
verified that it is libstdc++ and not libgcc_s.
Any idea what's going wrong with GCC 4.0.x's libstdc
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:07 -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On May 13, 2005, at 12:49 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Diego,
> >
> > it looks like it's this change:
> >
> > +2005-05-10 Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > +
> > + * tree-optimize.c (init_tree_optimization_passes): Re-organize
>
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:59:28AM +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> void test(void (*t)(void))
> {
> int i;
> for (i=0; i<10; i++)
> {
> t();
...
> int skip=0xdeadbeef;
>
> void do_goto (void)
> {
> goto l1;
> }
>
> test(do_goto);
...
> l1:
> if
On May 14, 2005, BjÃrn Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I.e. expand
> would insert two instructions after the double-set instruction that contain
> the two individual sets and an additional "use" statement. I.e. above
> sequence after expand then would look like
> (parallel[
> (set reg:SI 1
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 12:29 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:59:28AM +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> > void test(void (*t)(void))
> > {
> > int i;
> > for (i=0; i<10; i++)
> > {
> > t();
> ...
> > int skip=0xdeadbeef;
> >
> > void do_goto (void
> Björn Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have thinking about how to overcome part of the "double-setter"
> difficulties that arise when implementing cc0->CCmode conversion for
> a couple of targets:
> IIUC correctly one of the two or three difficulties with cc0->CCmode
> conversion is, that
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20050514 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20050514/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 CVS branch
with the following options: -rgcc-ss-4_0-20050514
You'll
Greg Schafer wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:44:59PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> > GCC 3.4.4 RC2 is now available here:
> >
> > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-3.4.4-20050512
> >
> > There are just a few changes from RC1 to fix critical problems people
> > experienced with RC1.
> >
On Friday, May 13, 2005, at 11:28 PM, maha lakshmi wrote:
I would like know if GCC compiler 2.95.3 could be
installed on Red Hat Entreprise Linux ES 3.0 and
recompile C/C++ programs that were written/compiled earlier
using 2.95.3 GCC compiler on Sun Solaris V 2.6
machine.
Also would like to know t
Bjoern Haase wrote:
> IIUC correctly one of the two or three difficulties with cc0->CCmode
> conversion is, that combine in it's present form is not able to
> recognize that in a sequence like
>
> (parallel[
> (set reg:SI 100) (minus:SI (reg:SI 101) (reg:SI 102))
> (set reg:CC_xxx CC) (co
Ok for Ada on x86-linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg00922.html
C still has one unexpected fail:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -Os
Laurent
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 15:44 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> GCC 3.4.4 RC2 is now available here:
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 01:54:03AM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> It would appear the problem is this patch:
> 2005-05-12 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 2005-04-04 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * testsuite/Makefile.am (check-local): Remove.
> (curent_symbo
Am Samstag, 14. Mai 2005 21:39 schrieb Alexandre Oliva:
> On May 14, 2005, BjÃrn Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I.e. expand
> > would insert two instructions after the double-set instruction that
> > contain the two individual sets and an additional "use" statement. I.e.
> > above sequence af
On May 14, 2005, at 8:06 PM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
Ok for Ada on x86-linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg00922.html
C still has one unexpected fail:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -Os
That is not unexcited and was fixed only for 4.0.0, there was a PR
about i
You wrote:
>GEWALTEXZESS:
>http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,345203,00.html
>
>Politiker zerreißt Menschenrechtsbericht:
>http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,325983,00.html
>
>Schily = Hitler
>http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,345929,00.html
>
>Schily wehrt sich
Lese selbst:
http://www.kommunisten-online.de/blackchanel/dresden3.htm
Error in the command: GEWALTEXZESS:
Unrecognized command verb: GEWALTEXZESS
Subsequent commands ignored because of previous error.
Ignored: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,345203,00.html
Ignored: Politiker zerreißt Menschenrechtsbericht:
Ignored: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0
Lese selbst:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/59427
Lese selbst:
http://brandenburg.rz.fhtw-berlin.de/poetschke.html
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 22:42 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2005, Roman Kennke wrote:
> >>> Is the pkgconfig directory at the correct location when put under lib/,
> >>> or shouldn't this be libdata/ instead?
> >> What system has $(prefix)/libdata? None I'm familiar with.
> > The BSD
Lese selbst:
http://www.kommunisten-online.de/blackchanel/dresden3.htm
Lese selbst:
http://www.npd.de/npd_info/deutschland/2005/d0405-13.html
Neue Dokumente:
http://www.rp-online.de/public/article/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/87647
Botschafter in Kiew beschwerte sich noch 2004:
http://www.rp-online.de/public/article/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/85735
Traumzie
Lese selbst:
http://www.die-kommenden.net/dk/zeitgeschichte/graeberschaendung.htm
28 matches
Mail list logo
