Mark Mitchell wrote:
Those are somewhat above my pain threshold. Is there something else
that we could do for the 4.0 branch? Like issue a warning and ignore
the friend declaration?
Sorry for long delay. I just got back from a trip (but I will be away
next week as well.) Doing what you sugg
Hi,
How can we measure the performance benefits of GCC instruction scheduler?
Are there any testcases to measure it?
--
Sachin
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Splitting up libgcj.so probably makes sense even for the Linux distro
> case (the one I am most concerned with at the moment), just so that
> apps that don't use AWT or Swing don't really pay for it. The
Hmm? Unless you initialize AWT/swing in all progra
Original Message
>From: Jørgen Havsberg Seland
>Sent: 06 May 2005 23:30
> additional information:
> Important to mount all binary folders with the -X option, as otherwise
> command-lines will be too long, for instance:
>
>mount -f -X c:/cygwin/bin /bin
>
> Important: This also goes
Hi,
For my PhD research, I'm working on an aspect language for C, called
Aspicere. References on Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP) can be found
on http://aosd.net, but basically aspects are modules which encapsulate
all related functionality (called advice) of a particular concern
(logging, per
> > Bug ID: 4910101
> > Synopsis: fbe needs a way to reference section labels
> > Category: compiler
> > Subcategory: assembler-x86
>
> Apparently this problem only shows up for x86 when using Sun tools, but
> when using GNU tools, it also shows up for sparc.
Do you have a testcase
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:44:44PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Original Message
>>From: J?rgen Havsberg Seland
>>Sent: 06 May 2005 23:30
>
>>additional information: Important to mount all binary folders with the
>>-X option, as otherwise command-lines will be too long, for instance:
>>
>>mount
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20050507 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20050507/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 CVS branch
with the following options: -rgcc-ss-4_0-20050507
You'll
Hi,
I have two questions about the C++ front end.
Consider a C++ program
static const int array[] = { 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2 };
int
foo (int a)
{
return array[7];
}
I am trying to fold array[7] into 2. It turns out that if T is an
ARRAY_REF,
TREE_READONLY (TREE_OPERAND (T, 0))
is 0.
