H. J. Lu wrote:
When -fprofile-arcs is used, the directory of profile data is fixed
to the build directory. If I want to run the binary on a different
machine, I have to create the same directory, which may not be very
easy. Is this intentional? Can we have have an option to specify the
different d
On Saturday, April 23, 2005, at 05:05 PM, Philip George wrote:
What's the smallest size I can squeeze gcc down to and how would I go
about compiling it in such a way?
My take:
#define optimize 0
and then rebuild with dead code stripping. :-) You'd be the first to
do this that I know of, so, wo
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 02:26:54PM -0400, Paul Schlie wrote:
> - sound's good, and a natural generalization of current mem ref attributes.
>
> (However ideally, function parameter and result value references would need
> to be similarly qualify-able in order to enable the proper attributes to
>
Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 09:07:23AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
>> Current GCC CVS Mainline fails to bootstrap for me:
>>
> Odd, my x86_64 works just fine. Send me a .i file?
Just for the record: I did this yesterday off-list.
I can still reproduce
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> H. J. Lu wrote:
> >When -fprofile-arcs is used, the directory of profile data is fixed
> >to the build directory. If I want to run the binary on a different
> >machine, I have to create the same directory, which may not be very
> >ea
I discovered an out of bound access in reload.c, which can happen under
certain conditions (bug 18877).
The problem is, that in decompose (reload.c) assumes, that true_regnum
returns only value < 0 for pseudo registers, which is in certain
situations not true (all available register in use and a
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:58:36PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> I can still reproduce the problem and played around a bit. If I
> disable checking completely, I can bootstrap. So, perhaps I have one
> more checking option enabled than you have?
>
Perhaps, but the ICE is in the generic verify_
On Apr 24, 2005, at 6:43 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Saturday, April 23, 2005, at 05:05 PM, Philip George wrote:
What's the smallest size I can squeeze gcc down to and how would I go
about compiling it in such a way?
My take:
#define optimize 0
"optimize" is a variable and "int 0" won't parse, so th
What did you really mean?
I need to install gcc into a disk image that will accompany a gui
application i'm writing.
the application will need to mount the volume on the disk image and use
the gcc that's on that volume.
it needs only to be able to compile extremely simple c apps from a
shell o
Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:58:36PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
>> I can still reproduce the problem and played around a bit. If I
>> disable checking completely, I can bootstrap. So, perhaps I have one
>> more checking option enabled than you have?
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20050424 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20050424/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 CVS branch
with the following options: -D2005-04-24 17:43 UTC
You'll
On Sunday, April 24, 2005, at 09:59 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
#define optimize 0
"optimize" is a variable and "int 0" won't parse, so that won't come
close.
I didn't see a patch there that I said was complete and survived a
bootstrap. It was a sketch of an idea.
What did you really mean?
Just
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> The GCC 4.0 branch is now open for regression fixes only, under the usual
> release branch rules.
Documented thusly.
Gerald
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.ht
* Philip George:
> it needs only to be able to compile extremely simple c apps from a
> shell opened from within the gui app.
Have a look at tcc. It might be more suited to your needs than GCC.
Hi,
I am thinking about merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node.
Background
--
tree_statement_list_node is a linked list node defined like so
struct tree_statement_list_node {
struct tree_statement_list_node *prev;
struct tree_statement_list_node *next;
tree stmt;
};
stm
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Johan Bergman (KI/EAB) wrote:
> Here is a unified diff for the proposed change (I think).
Johan, Giovanni, I just noticed that this one apparently feel trough
the cracks?
I had assumed that Giovanni would just go ahead an apply it since he's
an expert in that area and the patc
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 07:35:43PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> I configure with:
>
> /cvs/gcc/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/4.1-devel
> --enable-checking=misc,tree,gc,rtl,rtlflag,assert --enable-threads=posix
> --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared
> --enable-languages=c,
I'm in the camp that believes that the committee shouldn't change the
semantics of volatile. There are three key reasons to my argument:
- "You don't pay for what you don't use"
- Nonthreaded uses of volatile
- Avoiding insidious change
You don't pay for what you don't use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James E Wilson wrote:
> Sebastian Biallas wrote:
>
>> But I noticed some smaller optimization issues on x86, and on of them is
>> a regression to gcc 3.3 so I'm reporting this here. Accept my apologies
>> if this is already known, but I think it's wor
After synchronizing with Ian Lance Taylor on IRC, I'm in the
process of implementing the cc0 replacement machinery he
described here and found at
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/general%20backend%20cleanup> after
"Here is a possible approach in which macros are used in the MD
file readers to avoid the patt
Output of './config.guess': i686-pc-linux-gnu
Output of 'gcc -v': Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0
GNU/Linux Distro:
This is the information requested in INSTALL/finalinstall.html:
Output of config.guess:
powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
Output of gcc-4.0.0 -v:
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.0/configure --enable-threads=posix
--with-cpu=750 --enable-languages=c,c++,j
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:07:05PM -0700, Melissa O'Neill wrote:
> I'm in the camp that believes that the committee shouldn't change the
> semantics of volatile.
Many good arguments, particularly your point about "old volatile"
vs "new volatile".
Hello, using the 3.4.3 baseline on SGI MIPS3 Irix6.5,
I'm running into a problem where bad code is generated on a relatively
trivial program when both -funit-at-a-time and -foptimize-sibling-calls
is asserted. The nature of the failure is that the RTL optimizer
seems to get confused about what va
Joe Buck wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:07:05PM -0700, Melissa O'Neill wrote:
I'm in the camp that believes that the committee shouldn't change the
semantics of volatile.
Many good arguments, particularly your point about "old volatile"
vs "new volatile".
I agree.
I've no objection in princip
> From: Martin Koegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 02:26:54PM -0400, Paul Schlie wrote:
>> - sound's good, and a natural generalization of current mem ref attributes.
>>
>> (However ideally, function parameter and result value references would need
>> to be similarly qualify-ab
Does anyone know the point of the following warning, introduced with
gcc-4.0:
test.cxx:15: warning: non-local variable ‘::
::Instance’ uses anonymous type
for this code:
namespace {
enum { foo, bar = 10 } Instance;
}
Gcc issues this with default warning levels for enums and classes,
wh
Hello everybody!
Is there any util that would produce result containing the asm code
execution staticstics ??? The object code was produced by GCC.
The main thing I need is to know how much the specific assembler command of
the compiled program was executed.
I've seen the GCOV tool. It would be su
28 matches
Mail list logo
