Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-20 Thread chris jefferson
Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 19, 2005, at 2:56 AM, François-Xavier Coudert wrote: > >> Or am I the only person to find that disk is expensive (or working >> on his own hardware, maybe)? > > > A checkout costs US$0.50. This is around 2.6x more expensive than a > cvs checkout. Check around locally

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread Mike Stump
On Oct 19, 2005, at 2:56 AM, François-Xavier Coudert wrote: Or am I the only person to find that disk is expensive (or working on his own hardware, maybe)? A checkout costs US$0.50. This is around 2.6x more expensive than a cvs checkout. Check around locally, maybe you can find `throwaways

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-10-19 13:48:36 +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote: > Probably you're the only one finding disk space expensive. One can also write data on memory cards and they are expensive. This would be important to use Subversion on a PDA. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web:

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread Ranjit Mathew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Giovanni Bajo wrote: > > Probably you're the only one finding disk space expensive. HDs are quite > cheap nowadays. Anyway, I'm sure SVN people would be happy if you help Well, I'm another person who's concerned about growing local copy sizes. As it

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Having 5 subversion trees will need much more space (for local pristine copies), which I don't really have. Is there any way to force subversion use one pristine tree for all modified trees, or is my way of handling things completely rotten? I have a script called svn-switch-patch that undoes

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 08:14 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:56 +0200, François-Xavier Coudert wrote: > > > Not that I know of. As Daniel Berlin said, Subversion 1.4 will probably > > > have > > > support for checking out repositories with compressed local copies (or no > >

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:56 +0200, François-Xavier Coudert wrote: > > Not that I know of. As Daniel Berlin said, Subversion 1.4 will probably have > > support for checking out repositories with compressed local copies (or no > > copy > > at all -- but I wouldn't suggest this, as you'd start to be

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 13:48 +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote: > François-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Not that I know of. As Daniel Berlin said, Subversion 1.4 will probably > >> have support for checking out repositories with compressed local copies > >> (or no copy at all -- but I

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread Giovanni Bajo
François-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Not that I know of. As Daniel Berlin said, Subversion 1.4 will probably >> have support for checking out repositories with compressed local copies >> (or no copy at all -- but I wouldn't suggest this, as you'd start to be >> slow in "svn diff",

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread François-Xavier Coudert
> Not that I know of. As Daniel Berlin said, Subversion 1.4 will probably have > support for checking out repositories with compressed local copies (or no copy > at all -- but I wouldn't suggest this, as you'd start to be slow in "svn > diff", > "svn stat", etc). I guess no local copy would be fi

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread Giovanni Bajo
François-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do only have small involvement in gcc, preparing few patches (never > more than 5 at a time) on limited areas (gcc/fortran, libgfortran and > gcc/testsuite), always on mainline or 4.0 branch. The way I manage to > keep mind sanity right now is

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread Florian Weimer
* François-Xavier Coudert: > Having 5 subversion trees will need much more space (for local > pristine copies), which I don't really have. Is there any way to force > subversion use one pristine tree for all modified trees, or is my way > of handling things completely rotten? You could try svk, i

using multiple trees with subversion

2005-10-19 Thread François-Xavier Coudert
Hi all, I've been playing with the svn test repo during the last few days, updating my own (few) scripts and all, and it's been going very smoothly. The only thing that's worrying me is disk usage. I do only have small involvement in gcc, preparing few patches (never more than 5 at a time) on lim