On 26/04/2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Should I undo this change to the front page, now that the 'changes'
>> link is next to the 4.4.0 release on gcc-4.4/index.html ?
>
> I have to admit I don't feel strongly either way. What do you think?
If the li
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Should I undo this change to the front page, now that the 'changes'
> link is next to the 4.4.0 release on gcc-4.4/index.html ?
I have to admit I don't feel strongly either way. What do you think?
Gerald
On 06/04/2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> There is currently no way to get from the front page to the
>> gcc-4.4/changes.html page, should there be a "(changes)" link on the
>> front page until a release is added to the gcc-4.4/index.html page?
>
> I think
2009/4/6 Gerald Pfeifer:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> There is currently no way to get from the front page to the
>> gcc-4.4/changes.html page, should there be a "(changes)" link on the
>> front page until a release is added to the gcc-4.4/index.html page?
>
> I think that would
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> There is currently no way to get from the front page to the
> gcc-4.4/changes.html page, should there be a "(changes)" link on the
> front page until a release is added to the gcc-4.4/index.html page?
I think that would be appropriate, yes. Are you g
I spotted some problems in the gcc-4.4/porting_to.html page. There's a
missing html entity, the typo "memmber", and multibyte UTF-8 quotes,
which are a problem because the web server automatically adds a header
specifying Latin1 encoding. I'll commit this patch soon if noone
objects.
There is cur
Pierce Lopez writes:
> I was just reading this page: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html
> May I humbly draw your attention to this bullet point:
>
> -Wparentheses now warns about expressions such as (!x | y) and (!x &
> y). Using explicit parentheses, such as in ((!x) | y)), silences this
> w
I was just reading this page: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html
May I humbly draw your attention to this bullet point:
-Wparentheses now warns about expressions such as (!x | y) and (!x &
y). Using explicit parentheses, such as in ((!x) | y)), silences this
warning
Note the extra parenthesi
